Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723060
Recent Advancement in Solar Physics: A Meta-Analysis of the Efficiency, Gradient Composition, and Interface Engineering of Perovskite Solar Cells
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Solar Physics
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I3-1723060
Abstract
Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have rapidly emerged as a leading photovoltaic technology, achieving unprecedented gains in power conversion efficiency (PCE) within just over a decade. This study presents a meta-analysis of recent advancements in PSC efficiency, examining key factors, fabrication methods, material choices, and challenges. The pooled results indicate that single-junction PSCs exhibit a mean PCE of 18–22%, while tandem perovskite–silicon architectures achieve efficiencies above 26%, surpassing many established photovoltaic technologies. Efficiency gains are largely attributed to compositional engineering, particularly mixed-cation and mixed-halide formulations, which enhance carrier lifetimes and optimize band gaps. Interface engineering and defect passivation contribute further by reducing non-radiative recombination, yielding incremental improvements of up to 1.5 percentage points. Fabrication methods significantly influence outcomes: solution-processed cells remain cost-effective but exhibit greater variability. Material selection also affects performance; hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites deliver the highest efficiencies, while lead-free alternatives, such as tin-based PSCs, show lower mean PCEs (12–14%) but improved environmental safety. However, major challenges persist, including instability under moisture, heat, and illumination stress, with many PSCs experiencing >20% efficiency loss within 1,000 hours. Additionally, the toxicity of lead and difficulties in scaling up defect-free large-area devices present barriers to commercialization. In conclusion, this meta-analysis highlights both the extraordinary progress and the unresolved limitations of PSCs. While they have demonstrated record efficiencies exceeding 25%, future research must address stability, scalability, and sustainability to enable the transition of PSCs from laboratory prototypes to commercially viable solar technologies.
Keywords
perovskite solar cell, power conversion efficiency, tandem solar cell, hybrid organic-inorganic PSC.
References
[1] H. Kimata et al., "Open-Circuit-Voltage Improvement Mechanism of Perovskite Solar Cells Revealed by Operando Spin Observation," ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 15, no. 50, pp. 58539–58547, 2023/12/20 2023. Crossref
[2] Khatibi, F. Razi Astaraei, and M. H. Ahmadi, "Generation and combination of the solar cells: A current model review," Energy Science & Engineering, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 305–322, 2019. Crossref
[3] K. Rangelova and K. Alltieri. "Solar generates fifth of global electricity on summer solstice midday peak." Ember. https://ember-energy.org/latest-insights/the-global-solar-revolution/#:~:text=Global%20electricity%20generation%2C%20by%20technology%20(TWh)&text=In%202023%2C%20records%20for%20solar,19th%20year%20in%20a%20row. (accessed 10th April, 2025).
[4] L. Fernandez. "Solar electricity generation worldwide 2010-2023." Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1302055/global-solar-energy-share-electricity-mix/#:~:text=Share%20of%20solar%20electricity%20generation%20worldwide%202010%2D2023&text=Solar%20energy%20accounted%20for%20roughly,12%20percent%20of%20global%20electricity. (accessed 10th April, 2025).
[5] IEA, "Renewable Energy Market Update," IEA, Paris, France, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewable-energy-market-update-june-2023, Licence: CC BY 4.0
[6] J. Gong, S. B. Darling, and F. You, "Perovskite photovoltaics: life-cycle assessment of energy and environmental impacts," Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1953–1968, 2015. Crossref
[7] P. Löper et al., "Organic–inorganic halide perovskite/crystalline silicon four-terminal tandem solar cells," Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1619–1629, 2015. Crossref
[8] E. J. Juarez-Perez, Z. Hawash, S. R. Raga, L. K. Ono, and Y. Qi, "Thermal degradation of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite into NH3 and CH3I gases observed by coupled thermogravimetry–mass spectrometry analysis," Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 3406–3410, 2016. Crossref
[9] Y. Chen, S. Yamaguchi, A. Sato, D. Xue, and K. Marumoto, "Operando spin observation elucidating performance-improvement mechanisms during operation of Ruddlesden–Popper Sn-based perovskite solar cells," npj Flexible Electronics, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1, 2025/01/09 2025. Crossref
[10] P. Khirade and A. V. Raut, "Perovskite Structured Materials: Synthesis, Structure, Physical Properties and Applications," in Recent Advances in Multifunctional Perovskite Materials, P. Sharma and A. Kumar Eds. Rijeka: IntechOpen, 2022.
[11] J. Y. Kim, J.-W. Lee, H. S. Jung, H. Shin, and N.-G. Park, "High-Efficiency Perovskite Solar Cells," Chemical Reviews, vol. 120, no. 15, pp. 7867–7918, 2020/08/12 2020. Crossref
[12] D. Bailie and M. D. McGehee, "High-efficiency tandem perovskite solar cells," MRS Bulletin, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 681–686, 2015. Crossref
[13] Artini, "Crystal chemistry, stability and properties of interlanthanide perovskites: A review," Journal of the European Ceramic Society, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 427–440, 2017. Crossref
[14] J. Burschka et al., "Sequential Deposition as a Route to High-Performance Perovskite-Sensitized Solar Cells," Nature, vol. 499, p. 316, 2013. Crossref
[15] H. Zhou et al., "Interface engineering of highly efficient perovskite solar cells," Science, vol. 345, no. 6196, pp. 542–546, 2014. Crossref
[16] S.-H. Jeong et al., "Characterizing the Efficiency of Perovskite Solar Cells and Light-Emitting Diodes," Joule, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1206–1235, 2020. Crossref
[17] Yang et al., "Surface optimization to eliminate hysteresis for record efficiency planar perovskite solar cells," Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 3071–3078, 2016. Crossref
[18] D.-Y. Son et al., "Self-formed grain boundary healing layer for highly efficient CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells," Nature Energy, vol. 1, no. 7, p. 16081, 2016/06/20 2016. Crossref
[19] J. A. Christians, P. A. Miranda Herrera, and P. V. Kamat, "Transformation of the Excited State and Photovoltaic Efficiency of CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite upon Controlled Exposure to Humidified Air," J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 137, p. 1530, 2015. Crossref
[20] J. Tao et al., "Suppressing non-radiative recombination for efficient and stable perovskite solar cells," Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 509–544, 2025. Crossref
[21] Yang, R. Yang, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, S. F. Liu, and C. Li, "High efficiency flexible perovskite solar cells using superior low temperature TiO 2," Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 3208–3214, 2015. Crossref
[22] Y. Li et al., "High-efficiency robust perovskite solar cells on ultrathin flexible substrates," Nature Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 10214, 2016/01/11 2016. Crossref
[23] D. Gao et al., "Highly Efficient Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells through Pentylammonium Acetate Modification with Certified Efficiency of 23.35%," Advanced Materials, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 2206387, 2023. Crossref
[24] L. Yang et al., "Record-Efficiency Flexible Perovskite Solar Cells Enabled by Multifunctional Organic Ions Interface Passivation," Advanced Materials, vol. 34, no. 24, p. 2201681, 2022. Crossref
[25] M. Grätzel, "The Rise of Highly Efficient and Stable Perovskite Solar Cells," Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 487–491, 2017/03/21 2017. Crossref
[26] T. Ma et al., "Hole Transport Layer-Free Low-Bandgap Perovskite Solar Cells for Efficient All-Perovskite Tandems," Advanced Materials, vol. 36, no. 3, p. 2308240, 2024. Crossref
[27] Y. S. Chen, J. S. Manser, and P. V. Kamat, "All Solution-Processed Lead Halide Perovskite-BiVO4 Tandem Assembly for Photolytic Solar Fuels Production," J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 137, p. 974, 2015. Crossref
[28] Li et al., "Regulating Surface Termination for Efficient Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells with Greater Than 23% Efficiency," Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 142, no. 47, pp. 20134–20142, 2020/11/25 2020. Crossref
[29] Li et al., "Highly efficient p-i-n perovskite solar cells that endure temperature variations," Science, vol. 379, no. 6630, pp. 399–403, 2023. Crossref
[30] Z. Kang et al., "Synchronous dimension-crystallization engineering enables highly efficient 2D/3D tin perovskite solar cells," Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 4108–4119, 2025. Crossref
[31] Z. Xie et al., "High-Efficiency Perovskite Solar Cells Enabled by Guanylation Reaction for Removing MACl Residual and In-Situ Forming 2D Perovskite," Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 64, no. 7, p. e202419070, 2025. Crossref
[32] M. J. Page et al., "The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," BMJ, vol. 372, p. n71, 2021. Crossref
[33] R. Sarkis-Onofre, F. Catalá-López, E. Aromataris, and C. Lockwood, "How to properly use the PRISMA Statement," Systematic Reviews, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 117, 2021/04/19 2021. Crossref
[34] IAEA, "Radiation in Everyday Life," ed, 2023.
[35] UNSCEAR, "The estimation of whole-body doses from the intake of radiocaesium following the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station," 2022. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation.
[36] Tong, F. Lin, J. Wu, and Z. M. Wang, "High Performance Perovskite Solar Cells," Advanced Science, vol. 3, no. 5, p. 1500201, 2016. Crossref
[37] N. J. Jeon et al., "Compositional Engineering of Perovskite Materials for High-Performance Solar Cells," Nature, vol. 517, p. 476, 2015. Crossref
[38] N.-G. Park, "Methodologies for high efficiency perovskite solar cells," Nano Convergence, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 15, 2016/06/30 2016. Crossref
[39] J. Seo, J. H. Noh, and S. I. Seok, "Rational Strategies for Efficient Perovskite Solar Cells," Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 562–572, 2016/03/15 2016. Crossref
[40] J. Chang et al., "Bridging buried interface enable 24.67%-efficiency doctor-bladed perovskite solar cells in ambient condition," Nano Research, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 8068–8076, 2024/09/01 2024. Crossref
How to cite this paper
@article{1723060,
author = {Ebehita. O-O, N. A. A. Azeez, M. Umar},
title = {Recent Advancement in Solar Physics: A Meta-Analysis of the Efficiency, Gradient Composition, and Interface Engineering of Perovskite Solar Cells},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {1475-1493},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723060.pdf},
abstract = {Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have rapidly emerged as a leading photovoltaic technology, achieving unprecedented gains in power conversion efficiency (PCE) within just over a decade. This study presents a meta-analysis of recent advancements in PSC efficiency, examining key factors, fabrication methods, material choices, and challenges. The pooled results indicate that single-junction PSCs exhibit a mean PCE of 18–22%, while tandem perovskite–silicon architectures achieve efficiencies above 26%, surpassing many established photovoltaic technologies. Efficiency gains are largely attributed to compositional engineering, particularly mixed-cation and mixed-halide formulations, which enhance carrier lifetimes and optimize band gaps. Interface engineering and defect passivation contribute further by reducing non-radiative recombination, yielding incremental improvements of up to 1.5 percentage points. Fabrication methods significantly influence outcomes: solution-processed cells remain cost-effective but exhibit greater variability. Material selection also affects performance; hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites deliver the highest efficiencies, while lead-free alternatives, such as tin-based PSCs, show lower mean PCEs (12–14%) but improved environmental safety. However, major challenges persist, including instability under moisture, heat, and illumination stress, with many PSCs experiencing >20% efficiency loss within 1,000 hours. Additionally, the toxicity of lead and difficulties in scaling up defect-free large-area devices present barriers to commercialization. In conclusion, this meta-analysis highlights both the extraordinary progress and the unresolved limitations of PSCs. While they have demonstrated record efficiencies exceeding 25%, future research must address stability, scalability, and sustainability to enable the transition of PSCs from laboratory prototypes to commercially viable solar technologies.},
keywords = {perovskite solar cell, power conversion efficiency, tandem solar cell, hybrid organic-inorganic PSC.},
month = {September},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1723060}
}