Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723133
Developing an Integrated Risk Governance Framework for Saudi Holding Companies in Support of Vision 2030
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Risk Governance Framework
Abstract
Saudi holding companies are increasingly central to portfolio investment, sectoral diversification, localization, and large-scale transformation under Vision 2030. Their governance challenge is distinctive: while risks originate within individual subsidiaries, value destruction can propagate through shared financing, brands, digital infrastructure, suppliers, executives, and strategic dependencies at the group level. This review develops an integrated risk governance framework tailored to this multi-entity context. An integrative review approach synthesizes research on enterprise risk management, board governance, organizational resilience, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, digital risk, supply-chain resilience, and Saudi corporate governance. The synthesis demonstrates that conventional subsidiary-by-subsidiary risk registers are inadequate when the parent company must understand risk concentration, contagion, correlated exposures, and strategic trade-offs across a portfolio. Effective governance therefore requires five interconnected capabilities: board-level risk direction and appetite; a group risk office capable of aggregating and challenging exposures; clearly retained subsidiary ownership of operational risks; independent assurance; and a continuous decision loop linking risk information to capital allocation, strategy, and learning. Saudi evidence further indicates that board structure, audit and sustainability mechanisms, institutional quality, disclosure, and investor expectations influence the credibility of governance arrangements. The proposed framework aligns these findings with Vision 2030 priorities by positioning risk governance as an infrastructure for disciplined growth rather than mere compliance. It provides a research agenda and practical design principles for holding-company boards, group chief risk officers, subsidiary leaders, regulators, and investors seeking resilience without sacrificing entrepreneurial autonomy.
Keywords
risk governance; enterprise risk management; holding companies; Saudi Arabia; Vision 2030; corporate governance; resilience; ESG
References
[1] S. G. Anton and A. E. Afloarei Nucu, “Enterprise Risk Management: A Literature Review and Agenda for Future Research,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 13, no. 11, Art. no. 281, 2020, doi: 10.3390/jrfm13110281. MDPI
[2] M. F. Malik, M. Zaman, and S. Buckby, “Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee,” Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, vol. 16, no. 1, Art. no. 100178, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jcae.2019.100178. Crossref
[3] P. Bromiley, M. McShane, A. Nair, and E. Rustambekov, “Enterprise Risk Management: Review, Critique, and Research Directions,” Long Range Planning, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 265–276, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2014.07.005. Crossref
[4] M. Arena, M. Arnaboldi, and G. Azzone, “The organizational dynamics of Enterprise Risk Management,” Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 659–675, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.003. Crossref
[5] C. Florio and G. Leoni, “Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case,” The British Accounting Review, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 56–74, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2016.08.003. Crossref
[6] P. Lechner and N. Gatzert, “Determinants and value of enterprise risk management: empirical evidence from Germany,” The European Journal of Finance, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 867–887, 2018, doi: 10.1080/1351847X.2017.1347100. Taylor & Francis
[7] A. Ellul and V. Yerramilli, “Stronger Risk Controls, Lower Risk: Evidence from U.S. Bank Holding Companies,” The Journal of Finance, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 1757–1803, 2013, doi: 10.1111/jofi.12057. Wiley
[8] B. Chairani and S. V. Siregar, “The effect of enterprise risk management on financial performance and firm value: the role of environmental, social and governance performance,” Meditari Accountancy Research, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 647–670, 2021, doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-09-2019-0549. Emerald
[9] P. Dahmen, “Organizational resilience as a key property of enterprise risk management in response to novel and severe crisis events,” Risk Management and Insurance Review, vol. 26, pp. 203–245, 2023, doi: 10.1111/rmir.12245. Wiley
[10] O. Kacem and S. El Harbi, “Do risk governance and effective board affect bank performance? Evidence from large banks worldwide,” Risk Management, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 461–483, 2022, doi: 10.1057/s41283-022-00101-1. Springer
[11] A. M. A. M. Al-Sartawi, “Information technology governance and cybersecurity at the board level,” International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 150–161, 2020, doi: 10.1504/IJCIS.2020.107265. Crossref
[12] H. Huang, C. Wang, L. Wang, and L. Yarovaya, “Corporate digital transformation and idiosyncratic risk: Based on corporate governance perspective,” Emerging Markets Review, vol. 56, Art. no. 101045, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2023.101045. Crossref
[13] D. Ivanov and A. Dolgui, “Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2904–2915, 2020, doi: 10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727. Taylor & Francis
[14] D. C. Broadstock, K. Chan, L. T. W. Cheng, and X. Wang, “The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China,” Finance Research Letters, vol. 38, Art. no. 101716, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716. Crossref
[15] M. Nurunnabi, “Transformation from an Oil-based Economy to a Knowledge-based Economy in Saudi Arabia: the Direction of Saudi Vision 2030,” Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 536–564, 2017, doi: 10.1007/s13132-017-0479-8. Springer
[16] H. Alregab, “The role of corporate governance in attracting foreign investment: An empirical investigation of Saudi-listed firms in light of vision 2030,” International Journal of Finance & Economics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 284–294, 2023, doi: 10.1002/ijfe.2420. Wiley
[17] U. H. Umar, E. A. Firmansyah, M. R. Danlami, and M. A. S. Al-Faryan, “Revisiting the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and ESG disclosures in Saudi Arabia,” Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 724–747, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JAOC-01-2023-0011. Emerald
[18] E. A. Firmansyah, U. H. Umar, and R. S. Jibril, “Investigating the effect of ESG disclosure on firm performance: The case of Saudi Arabian listed firms,” Cogent Economics & Finance, vol. 11, no. 2, Art. no. 2287923, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23322039.2023.2287923. Taylor & Francis
[19] O. S. Habtoor, “Board Attributes and Bank Performance in Light of Saudi Corporate Governance Regulations,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 15, no. 10, Art. no. 441, 2022, doi: 10.3390/jrfm15100441. MDPI
[20] O. A. Bagais and K. S. Aljaaidi, “Corporate governance attributes and firm performance in Saudi Arabia,” Accounting, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 931–936, 2020, doi: 10.5267/j.ac.2020.8.005. Crossref
[21] M. A. S. Al-Faryan, “The effect of board composition and managerial pay on Saudi firm performance,” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 693–758, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11156-021-00959-4. Springer
[22] H. A. Boshnak, M. Alsharif, and M. Alharthi, “Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance in Saudi Arabia before and during the COVID-19 outbreak,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 10, no. 1, Art. no. 2195990, 2023, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2023.2195990. Taylor & Francis
[23] N. Alwadani, H. Al-Shaer, and K. Albitar, “The impact of internal governance mechanisms on environmental performance of Saudi firms,” International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 40–57, 2024, doi: 10.1108/IJAIM-04-2023-0084. Emerald
[24] H. Alregab, “The Role of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance on Attracting Foreign Ownership: Evidence from Saudi Arabia,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 23, Art. no. 15626, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su142315626. MDPI
[25] N. Samargandi, M. A. Alghfais, and H. M. AlHuthail, “Factors in Saudi FDI Inflow,” SAGE Open, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.1177/21582440211067242. SAGE
[26] A. H. Bazhair and H. G. H. Sulimany, “Does Family Ownership Moderate the Relationship between Board Diversity and the Financial Performance of Saudi-Listed Firms,” International Journal of Financial Studies, vol. 11, no. 4, Art. no. 118, 2023, doi: 10.3390/ijfs11040118. MDPI
[27] Y. A. Al-Matari, “Do the characteristics of the board chairman have an effect on corporate performance? Empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 4, Art. no. e09286, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09286. Crossref
[28] E.-S. Ebaid, “Corporate governance mechanisms and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from an emerging market,” Journal of Global Responsibility, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 396–420, 2022, doi: 10.1108/JGR-12-2021-0105. Emerald
[29] M. J. Page, J. E. McKenzie, P. M. Bossuyt, I. Boutron, T. C. Hoffmann, C. D. Mulrow, L. Shamseer, J. M. Tetzlaff, E. A. Akl, S. E. Brennan, R. Chou, J. Glanville, J. M. Grimshaw, A. Hróbjartsson, M. M. Lalu, T. Li, E. W. Loder, E. Mayo-Wilson, S. McDonald, L. A. McGuinness, L. A. Stewart, J. Thomas, A. C. Tricco, V. A. Welch, P. Whiting, and D. Moher, “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews,” BMJ, vol. 372, Art. no. n71, 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. BMJ
[30] H. Snyder, “Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 104, pp. 333–339, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039. Crossref
How to cite this paper
@article{1723133,
author = {Essam Ali Hassan Abdelaal},
title = {Developing an Integrated Risk Governance Framework for Saudi Holding Companies in Support of Vision 2030},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {2938-2949},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723133.pdf},
abstract = {Saudi holding companies are increasingly central to portfolio investment, sectoral diversification, localization, and large-scale transformation under Vision 2030. Their governance challenge is distinctive: while risks originate within individual subsidiaries, value destruction can propagate through shared financing, brands, digital infrastructure, suppliers, executives, and strategic dependencies at the group level. This review develops an integrated risk governance framework tailored to this multi-entity context. An integrative review approach synthesizes research on enterprise risk management, board governance, organizational resilience, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, digital risk, supply-chain resilience, and Saudi corporate governance. The synthesis demonstrates that conventional subsidiary-by-subsidiary risk registers are inadequate when the parent company must understand risk concentration, contagion, correlated exposures, and strategic trade-offs across a portfolio. Effective governance therefore requires five interconnected capabilities: board-level risk direction and appetite; a group risk office capable of aggregating and challenging exposures; clearly retained subsidiary ownership of operational risks; independent assurance; and a continuous decision loop linking risk information to capital allocation, strategy, and learning. Saudi evidence further indicates that board structure, audit and sustainability mechanisms, institutional quality, disclosure, and investor expectations influence the credibility of governance arrangements. The proposed framework aligns these findings with Vision 2030 priorities by positioning risk governance as an infrastructure for disciplined growth rather than mere compliance. It provides a research agenda and practical design principles for holding-company boards, group chief risk officers, subsidiary leaders, regulators, and investors seeking resilience without sacrificing entrepreneurial autonomy.},
keywords = {risk governance; enterprise risk management; holding companies; Saudi Arabia; Vision 2030; corporate governance; resilience; ESG},
month = {September},
}