International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723251

1723251 Vol 10 · Issue 3 Download Paper

Comparative Effects of Bone Char, Spent-Palm-bunch, and NPK Biodegradation Treatment on Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) of Crude-oil Polluted Soil

Ekene Nwude Afam Anthony Nwude Ipeghan J. Otaraku

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Environmental Engineering, soil Bioremediation

Abstract

This study comparatively evaluated the efficacy of two organic amendments: bone char and spent palm bunch (SPB), against conventional NPK (20:10:10) fertilizer and natural attenuation in reducing total hydrocarbon content (THC) in crude oil-polluted soil over a 10-week incubation period, across application rates ranging from 0.5 to 14.0 kg. After contamination with THC from an initial concentration of 38 mg/kg in unpolluted soil to 23,560 mg/kg, soil acidification and a decrease in nitrogen and phosphorus availability were detected. All amendments produced statistically significant THC reductions relative to the unamended control (p < 0.05). Bone char achieved the fastest degradation kinetics, with a first-order rate constant of 0.021 day⁻¹, a half-life of 33.01 days, and biostimulation efficiency of 79.37% at 6.5 kg application, outperforming both NPK (half-life ≈ 57.76 days) and SPB (half-life ≈ 99.02 days). The highest degradation efficiency was observed at intermediate application rates, which did not increase linearly with the dosage, indicating an optimal nutrient threshold. Total THC degradation was below 25% in all treatments within the study period. These results identify bone char as a highly effective, low-cost alternative to inorganic fertilization for accelerating hydrocarbon bioremediation in tropical, petroleum-impacted soils, with implications for scalable, field-level restoration practice.

Keywords

Total Hydrocarbon Content, Crude Oil-Polluted Soil, Bioremediation, Bone Char, Spent Palm-Bunch, Inorganic Fertilizer.

References

[1] S. A. Adebusoye, M. O. Ilori, O. O. Amund, O. D. Teniola, and S. O. Olatope, “Microbial Degradation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in a Polluted Tropical Stream,” The Journal of American Science, vol. 2, no. 3, 2007.

[2] M. J. Ayotamuno, R. B. Kogbara, and J. C. Agunwamba, “Bioremediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Polluted Agricultural Soil at Various Levels of Soil Tillage in Port Harcourt, Nigeria,” Nigerian Journal of Technology, vol. 25, pp. 44–55, 2025.

[3] E. R. Daka, M. Moslen, C. A. Ekeh, and I. K. E. Ekweozor, “Sediment Quality Status of Two Creeks in the Upper Bonny Estuary, Niger Delta, in Relation to Urban/Industrial Activities,” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 78, pp. 515–521, 2007, doi: 10.1007/s00128-007-9151-5. Springer

[4] I. Elinskiy, R. M. Akhmedov, and Y. A. Ivanova, “The problem of environmental pollution in oil production: Topical issue,” Vestnik of Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, no. 7, pp. 118–122, 2020, doi: 10.24411/2073-0454-2020-10397. Crossref

[5] D. B. Ikiogha, I. J. Otaraku, O. L. Y. Momoh, and M. O. Welcome, “Comparative Effects of Bone Char and NPK Agricultural Fertilizers on Hydrocarbon Utilizing Bacteria and Fungi in Crude Oil Polluted Soil,” American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences (ASRJETS), vol. 55, pp. 35–49, 2019.

[6] D. Jones, D. Health, M. Hagley, M. Jones, S. Petch, R. Milne, R. Croxford, and K. Lee, “A field Demonstration of the efficacy of Bioremediation to treat oiled shorelines following the sea Empress incident,” Environmental Technology, vol. 20, p. 862, 1999.

[7] H. Pathak, A. Vashishtha, P. K. Jain, A. Nagmani, D. P. Jaroli, and P. Jain, “Physico-chemical properties of Petroleum contaminated soil collected from coastal areas of Mumbai,” Asian Journal of Experimental Sciences, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 175–178, 2010.

[8] D. V. Venosa, “Bioremediation in Oil spill response,” 2012. Accessed: Jul. 27, 2013.

[9] A. D. Venosa and X. Zhu, “Biodegradation of crude oil contaminating marine shorelines and freshwater wetlands,” Spill Science & Technology Bulletin, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 163–178, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S1353-2561(03)00019-7. ScienceDirect

[10] Y. Wang, J. Feng, Q. Lin, X. Lyu, X. Wang, and G. Wang, “Effects of Crude Oil Contamination on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Monaoge Wetland of China,” Chinese Geographical Science, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 708–715, 2013.

How to cite this paper

Ekene Nwude, Afam Anthony Nwude, Ipeghan J. Otaraku "Comparative Effects of Bone Char, Spent-Palm-bunch, and NPK Biodegradation Treatment on Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) of Crude-oil Polluted Soil" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 3 2026 Page 2901-2917
Ekene Nwude, Afam Anthony Nwude, Ipeghan J. Otaraku "Comparative Effects of Bone Char, Spent-Palm-bunch, and NPK Biodegradation Treatment on Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) of Crude-oil Polluted Soil" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 3, Sep. 2026
Ekene Nwude, Afam Anthony Nwude, Ipeghan J. Otaraku (2026). Comparative Effects of Bone Char, Spent-Palm-bunch, and NPK Biodegradation Treatment on Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) of Crude-oil Polluted Soil. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(3).
Ekene Nwude, Afam Anthony Nwude, Ipeghan J. Otaraku "Comparative Effects of Bone Char, Spent-Palm-bunch, and NPK Biodegradation Treatment on Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) of Crude-oil Polluted Soil" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 3, Sep. 2026.
@article{1723251,
      author = {Ekene Nwude, Afam Anthony Nwude, Ipeghan J. Otaraku},
      title = {Comparative Effects of Bone Char, Spent-Palm-bunch, and NPK Biodegradation Treatment on Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) of Crude-oil Polluted Soil},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {2901-2917},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723251.pdf},
      abstract = {This study comparatively evaluated the efficacy of two organic amendments: bone char and spent palm bunch (SPB), against conventional NPK (20:10:10) fertilizer and natural attenuation in reducing total hydrocarbon content (THC) in crude oil-polluted soil over a 10-week incubation period, across application rates ranging from 0.5 to 14.0 kg. After contamination with THC from an initial concentration of 38 mg/kg in unpolluted soil to 23,560 mg/kg, soil acidification and a decrease in nitrogen and phosphorus availability were detected. All amendments produced statistically significant THC reductions relative to the unamended control (p < 0.05). Bone char achieved the fastest degradation kinetics, with a first-order rate constant of 0.021 day⁻¹, a half-life of 33.01 days, and biostimulation efficiency of 79.37% at 6.5 kg application, outperforming both NPK (half-life ≈ 57.76 days) and SPB (half-life ≈ 99.02 days). The highest degradation efficiency was observed at intermediate application rates, which did not increase linearly with the dosage, indicating an optimal nutrient threshold. Total THC degradation was below 25% in all treatments within the study period. These results identify bone char as a highly effective, low-cost alternative to inorganic fertilization for accelerating hydrocarbon bioremediation in tropical, petroleum-impacted soils, with implications for scalable, field-level restoration practice.},
      keywords = {Total Hydrocarbon Content, Crude Oil-Polluted Soil, Bioremediation, Bone Char, Spent Palm-Bunch, Inorganic Fertilizer.},
      month = {September},
  }