Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723405
Governance and Explainability of Advanced Decision-Support Systems in Saudi Manufacturing: Integrating IFRS, Audit Controls and Management Accountability
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Advanced Decision-Support Systems
Abstract
Advanced decision-support systems are increasingly embedded in forecasting, costing, inventory, procurement, maintenance, quality, and financial reporting across manufacturing. Their value, however, depends on whether recommendations can be understood, challenged, reconciled with accounting requirements, and assigned to accountable managers. This review develops an integrated governance framework for Saudi manufacturing that connects explainable artificial intelligence, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), audit controls, and management accountability. Evidence published from 2020 to 2025 was synthesized across auditing, accounting information systems, responsible artificial intelligence, internal audit, financial reporting, and Saudi digital-transformation research. The literature indicates that predictive accuracy alone is insufficient in high-consequence decisions. Decision-support outputs require traceable data lineage, version-controlled models, explanations suited to user roles, control evidence, and explicit approval authority. Explainability is most useful when it clarifies influential drivers, uncertainty, alternative scenarios, and conditions under which a recommendation should not be followed. IFRS alignment requires an additional accounting-policy layer so that model outputs affecting inventory, impairment, provisions, useful lives, revenue, or estimates remain consistent with recognized accounting judgments and evidence. Auditability depends on reproducible inputs, logged overrides, access controls, validation, and retained documentation. The proposed framework therefore separates analytical recommendation from management authorization while linking both through a controlled evidence chain. For Saudi manufacturing, the framework supports Vision 2030 objectives by combining digital productivity with stronger reporting reliability, governance discipline, local analytical capability, and defensible executive decision-making.
Keywords
artificial intelligence; explainability; decision-support systems; IFRS; audit controls; management accountability; manufacturing; Saudi Arabia; Vision 2030; model governance
References
[1] D. Leocádio, L. Malheiro, and J. Reis, “Artificial Intelligence in Auditing: A Conceptual Framework for Auditing Practices,” Administrative Sciences, vol. 14, Art. no. 238, 2024, doi: 10.3390/admsci14100238. MDPI
[2] A. H. Abdullah and F. A. Almaqtari, “The impact of artificial intelligence and Industry 4.0 on transforming accounting and auditing practices,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 10, Art. no. 100218, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100218. ScienceDirect
[3] C. Zhang, S. Cho, and M. Vasarhelyi, “Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in auditing,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, vol. 46, Art. no. 100572, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100572. Crossref
[4] Munoko, H. L. Brown-Liburd, and M. Vasarhelyi, “The Ethical Implications of Using Artificial Intelligence in Auditing,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 167, pp. 209–234, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10551-019-04407-1. Springer
[5] Afsay, A. Tahriri, and Z. Rezaee, “A meta-analysis of factors affecting acceptance of information technology in auditing,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, vol. 49, Art. no. 100608, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100608. ScienceDirect
[6] Fedyk, J. Hodson, N. Khimich, and T. Fedyk, “Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process?,” Review of Accounting Studies, vol. 27, pp. 938–985, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11142-022-09697-x. Springer
[7] H. Han, R. K. Shiwakoti, R. Jarvis, C. Mordi, and D. Botchie, “Accounting and auditing with blockchain technology and artificial intelligence: A literature review,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, vol. 48, Art. no. 100598, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2022.100598. ScienceDirect
[8] K.-H. Hu, F.-H. Chen, M.-F. Hsu, and G.-H. Tzeng, “Governance of artificial intelligence applications in a business audit via a fusion fuzzy multiple rule-based decision-making model,” Financial Innovation, vol. 9, Art. no. 117, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40854-022-00436-4. Springer
[9] Y. A. Huson, L. Sierra-García, and M. A. Garcia-Benau, “A bibliometric review of information technology, artificial intelligence, and blockchain on auditing,” Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, vol. 35, pp. 91–113, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14783363.2023.2256260. Taylor & Francis
[10] Laux, S. Wachter, and B. Mittelstadt, “Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act: On the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk,” Regulation & Governance, vol. 18, pp. 3–32, 2024, doi: 10.1111/rego.12512. Wiley
[11] R. Samiolo, C. Spence, and D. Toh, “Auditor judgment in the fourth industrial revolution,” Contemporary Accounting Research, vol. 41, pp. 498–528, 2024, doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12901. Wiley
[12] R. Seethamraju and A. Hecimovic, “Adoption of artificial intelligence in auditing: An exploratory study,” Australian Journal of Management, vol. 48, pp. 780–800, 2023, doi: 10.1177/03128962221108440. SAGE
[13] F. A. Wassie and L. P. Lakatos, “Artificial intelligence and the future of the internal audit function,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 11, Art. no. 386, 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-02905-w. Nature
[14] Estep, E. E. Griffith, and N. L. MacKenzie, “How do financial executives respond to the use of artificial intelligence in financial reporting and auditing?,” Review of Accounting Studies, vol. 29, pp. 2798–2831, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11142-023-09771-y. Springer
[15] Peng and G. Tian, “Intelligent auditing techniques for enterprise finance,” Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 32, Art. no. 20230011, 2023, doi: 10.1515/jisys-2023-0011. De Gruyter
[16] M. J. Rahman and A. Ziru, “Clients’ digitalization, audit firms’ digital expertise, and audit quality: Evidence from China,” International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, vol. 31, pp. 221–246, 2023, doi: 10.1108/IJAIM-08-2022-0170. Emerald
[17] M. Alotaibi, “Cloud computing to audit quality-evidence from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,” International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting, vol. 17, pp. 18–29, 2023, doi: 10.33094/ijaefa.v17i1.1004. International Journal of Applied Economics, Finance and Accounting
[18] N. T. M. Anh, L. T. K. Hoa, L. P. Thao, D. A. Nhi, N. T. Long, N. T. Truc, and V. N. Xuan, “The Effect of Technology Readiness on Adopting Artificial Intelligence in Accounting and Auditing in Vietnam,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 17, Art. no. 27, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jrfm17010027. MDPI
[19] W. Rodgers, S. Al-Shaikh, and M. Khalil, “Protocol Analysis Data Collection Technique Implemented for Artificial Intelligence Design,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 71, pp. 6842–6853, 2023.
[20] A. Shapovalova, O. Kuzmenko, O. Polishchuk, T. Larikova, and Z. Myronchuk, “Modernization of the National Accounting and Auditing System Using Digital Transformation Tools,” Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, vol. 4, pp. 33–52, 2023, doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.4.51.2023.4102. Crossref
[21] H. Alhumoudi and A. Juayr, “Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation on Auditing Practices in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study,” Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, vol. 15, pp. 1–30, 2023, doi: 10.5296/ajfa.v15i2.18976. Crossref
[22] A. H. J. Alhazmi, S. M. N. Islam, and M. Prokofieva, “The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Adoption on the Quality of Financial Reports on the Saudi Stock Exchange,” International Journal of Financial Studies, vol. 13, Art. no. 21, 2025, doi: 10.3390/ijfs13010021. MDPI
[23] Johri, “Impact of artificial intelligence on the performance and quality of accounting information systems and accuracy of financial data reporting,” Accounting Forum, vol. 49, pp. 1096–1120, 2025, doi: 10.1080/01559982.2025.2451004. Taylor & Francis
[24] W. J. Yeo, W. Van Der Heever, R. Mao, R. Satapathy, E. Cambria, and G. Mengaldo, “A comprehensive review on financial explainable AI,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 58, Art. no. 189, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10462-024-11077-7. Springer
[25] Y. Li and S. Goel, “Bridging IT auditors and AI auditing: Understanding pathways to effective IT audits of AI-driven processes,” Advances in Accounting, vol. 69, Art. no. 100842, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.adiac.2025.100842. Crossref
[26] Kokina, S. Blanchette, T. H. Davenport, and D. Pachamanova, “Challenges and opportunities for artificial intelligence in auditing: Evidence from the field,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, vol. 56, Art. no. 100734, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100734. ScienceDirect
[27] Wu and L. Ge, “Is AI the new corporate monitor? Evidence from excessive on-the-job consumption,” Economics Letters, vol. 254, Art. no. 112424, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112424. Crossref
[28] T. F. Alruwaili and M. H. Mgammal, “The impact of artificial intelligence on accounting practices: an academic perspective,” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 12, Art. no. 1197, 2025, doi: 10.1057/s41599-025-05004-6. Nature
[29] A. H. J. Alhazmi, S. M. N. Islam, and M. Prokofieva, “The Impact of Changing External Auditors, Auditor Tenure, and Audit Firm Type on the Quality of Financial Reports on the Saudi Stock Exchange,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 17, Art. no. 407, 2024, doi: 10.3390/jrfm17090407. MDPI
[30] R. R. Barniv, M. Myring, and T. Westfall, “Does IFRS experience improve analyst performance?,” Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, vol. 46, Art. no. 100443, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2021.100443. Crossref
How to cite this paper
@article{1723405,
author = {Muhammad Yasir Bashir},
title = {Governance and Explainability of Advanced Decision-Support Systems in Saudi Manufacturing: Integrating IFRS, Audit Controls and Management Accountability},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {3},
pages = {2736-2748},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723405.pdf},
abstract = {Advanced decision-support systems are increasingly embedded in forecasting, costing, inventory, procurement, maintenance, quality, and financial reporting across manufacturing. Their value, however, depends on whether recommendations can be understood, challenged, reconciled with accounting requirements, and assigned to accountable managers. This review develops an integrated governance framework for Saudi manufacturing that connects explainable artificial intelligence, International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), audit controls, and management accountability. Evidence published from 2020 to 2025 was synthesized across auditing, accounting information systems, responsible artificial intelligence, internal audit, financial reporting, and Saudi digital-transformation research. The literature indicates that predictive accuracy alone is insufficient in high-consequence decisions. Decision-support outputs require traceable data lineage, version-controlled models, explanations suited to user roles, control evidence, and explicit approval authority. Explainability is most useful when it clarifies influential drivers, uncertainty, alternative scenarios, and conditions under which a recommendation should not be followed. IFRS alignment requires an additional accounting-policy layer so that model outputs affecting inventory, impairment, provisions, useful lives, revenue, or estimates remain consistent with recognized accounting judgments and evidence. Auditability depends on reproducible inputs, logged overrides, access controls, validation, and retained documentation. The proposed framework therefore separates analytical recommendation from management authorization while linking both through a controlled evidence chain. For Saudi manufacturing, the framework supports Vision 2030 objectives by combining digital productivity with stronger reporting reliability, governance discipline, local analytical capability, and defensible executive decision-making.},
keywords = {artificial intelligence; explainability; decision-support systems; IFRS; audit controls; management accountability; manufacturing; Saudi Arabia; Vision 2030; model governance},
month = {September},
}