International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723407

1723407 Vol 10 · Issue 3 Download Paper

User-Centered Mobile Application Design for Standards, Compliance, and Regulatory Services in Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030

Mohamed Hanifa

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Mobile Application

Abstract

Background: Saudi Arabia's digital transformation has shifted many public interactions from office-based transactions to mobile and integrated digital services. Standards, compliance, licensing and regulatory services are especially demanding because users must interpret formal requirements, submit evidence, understand status changes and act within prescribed time limits. A technically functional application can therefore fail if its information architecture, language, error handling or trust cues do not match the user's decision process. Objective: This review synthesises recent evidence on user-centred mobile government, accessibility, digital trust, regulatory technology and citizen-centric service design to identify design principles for mobile standards and compliance services in Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030. Methods: A structured integrative review was undertaken using 30 peer-reviewed, DOI-verified sources published from 2020 to 2025. Evidence was coded across usability, regulatory clarity, accessibility, trust, service integration and continuous improvement, then translated into a design framework for high-consequence public service journeys. Results: The synthesis indicates that effective regulatory applications require more than simplified screens. They should convert rules into task-based pathways, make obligations and consequences visible at the point of action, support Arabic-first and accessible interaction, provide traceable status and evidence handling, minimise avoidable data entry, and expose clear routes for correction and human support. Conclusions: User-centred design can operate as a governance mechanism as well as an interface discipline. When regulatory logic, accessibility, trust and service orchestration are designed together, mobile services can reduce administrative burden while strengthening consistency, transparency and compliance outcomes.

Keywords

user-centred design; mobile government; regulatory services; compliance; Saudi Arabia; Vision 2030

References

[1] Alshahrani, “Adopting emerging technologies in digital government: A multi-case analysis of drivers, enablers, and challenges in Saudi Arabia,” Digital Government: Research and Practice, vol. 6, no. 3, Art. no. 36, pp. 1–26, 2025, doi: 10.1145/3719297. ACM

[2] H. O. Al-Sakran and M. A. Alsudairi, “Usability and accessibility assessment of Saudi Arabia mobile e-government websites,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 48254–48275, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3068917. Crossref

[3] A. S. M. Almamy, “Understanding factors affecting e-government adoption in Saudi Arabia: The role of religiosity,” International Journal of Customer Relationship Marketing and Management, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2022, doi: 10.4018/IJCRMM.289209. Crossref

[4] I. Alkraiji, “Citizen satisfaction with mandatory e-government services: A conceptual framework and an empirical validation,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 117253–117265, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3004541. Crossref

[5] I. Alkraiji, “An examination of citizen satisfaction with mandatory e-government services: Comparison of two information systems success models,” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 36–58, 2021, doi: 10.1108/TG-01-2020-0015. Emerald

[6] M. N. Alkhomsan, N. Alturayeif, S. Alwadei, and M. Baslyman, “UsAge guidelines: Toward usable Saudi M-government applications for elderly users,” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 35, pp. 202–218, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2022.11.011. Springer

[7] D. Chang, F. Li, and L. Huang, “A user-centered evaluation and redesign approach for e-government APP,” in Proc. 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), 2020, pp. 270–274, doi: 10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309856. Crossref

[8] J. Zhu and H. Hou, “Research on user experience evaluation of mobile applications in government services,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 52634–52641, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070365. Crossref

[9] A. J. Desmal, S. Hamid, M. K. Othman, and A. Zolait, “Exploration of the usability quality attributes of mobile government services: A literature review,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 8, Art. no. e1026, 2022, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1026. PeerJ

[10] F. K. Y. Chan, J. Y. L. Thong, S. A. Brown, and V. Venkatesh, “Service design and citizen satisfaction with e-government services: A multidimensional perspective,” Public Administration Review, vol. 81, no. 5, pp. 874–894, 2021, doi: 10.1111/puar.13308. Wiley

[11] Wang and T. S. H. Teo, “Online service quality and perceived value in mobile government success: An empirical study of mobile police in China,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 52, Art. no. 102076, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102076. Crossref

[12] R. Eid, H. Selim, and Y. El-Kassrawy, “Understanding citizen intention to use m-government services: An empirical study in the UAE,” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 463–482, 2020, doi: 10.1108/TG-10-2019-0100. Emerald

[13] A. F. Radwan, T. Snoussi, S. A. Mousa, and M. Abdulzaher, “Using smart applications in delivering government services in the UAE: Factors of adoption and satisfaction,” International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.4018/IJSSMET.326520. Crossref

[14] S. Dechamps, A. Simonofski, and C. Burnay, “Citizen-centricity in digital government: A theoretical and empirical typology,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 1, Art. no. 102005, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2024.102005. ScienceDirect

[15] H. Scholta and I. Lindgren, “Proactivity in digital public services: A conceptual analysis,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 3, Art. no. 101832, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101832. ScienceDirect

[16] Townley and C. Koop, “Exploring the potential and limits of digital tools for inclusive regulatory engagement with citizens,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 1, Art. no. 101901, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101901. ScienceDirect

[17] Charoenwong, Z. T. Kowaleski, A. Kwan, and A. G. Sutherland, “RegTech: Technology-driven compliance and its effects on profitability, operations, and market structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 154, Art. no. 103792, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103792. ScienceDirect

[18] R. El Khoury and M. M. Alshater, “RegTech advancements-a comprehensive review of its evolution, challenges, and implications for financial regulation and compliance,” Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1450–1485, 2025.

[19] P. Llorens-Vernet and J. Miró, “Standards for mobile health-related apps: Systematic review and development of a guide,” JMIR mHealth and uHealth, vol. 8, no. 3, Art. no. e13057, 2020, doi: 10.2196/13057. JMIR

[20] M. H. Alshira'H, “The effects of usability and accessibility for e-government services on the end-user satisfaction,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 78–90, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v14i13.14659. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies

[21] M. Al-Razgan, S. Almoaiqel, N. Alrajhi, A. Alhumegani, A. Alshehri, B. Alnefaie, R. AlKhamiss, and S. Rushdi, “A systematic literature review on the usability of mobile applications for visually impaired users,” PeerJ Computer Science, vol. 7, Art. no. e771, 2021, doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.771. Crossref

[22] A. Al-Sa'di and H. Al-Samarraie, “A Delphi evaluation of user interface design guidelines: The case of Arabic,” Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 2022, Art. no. 5492230, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/5492230. Wiley

[23] G. van Toorn, “Inclusion interrupted: Lessons from the making of a digital assistant by and for people with disability,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 1, Art. no. 101900, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101900. ScienceDirect

[24] Y. Kim and J. Lee, “Digitally vulnerable populations' use of e-government services: Inclusivity and access,” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 422–446, 2024, doi: 10.1080/23276665.2024.2321569. Taylor & Francis

[25] S. Abdurahman and S. Kabanda, “Factors influencing the design and implementation of accessible e-government services in South Africa,” The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, vol. 90, no. 4, Art. no. e12317, 2024, doi: 10.1002/isd2.12317. Wiley

[26] A. C. Oliveira, L. F. da Silva, M. M. Eler, and A. P. Freire, “Accessibility of Brazilian federal agencies' mobile apps: Requirements, conformance and response to complaints,” iSys - Brazilian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 45–73, 2021, doi: 10.5753/isys.2021.2016. iSys

[27] R. Castilla, A. Pacheco, and J. Franco, “Digital government: Mobile applications and their impact on access to public information,” SoftwareX, vol. 22, Art. no. 101382, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2023.101382. Crossref

[28] R. Castilla, A. Pacheco, I. Robles, A. Reyes, and R. Inquilla, “Digital channel for interaction with citizens in public sector entities,” World Journal of Engineering, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 547–552, 2021, doi: 10.1108/WJE-08-2020-0377. Emerald

[29] Prokop and M. Tepe, “Talk or type? The effect of digital interfaces on citizens' satisfaction with standardized public services,” Public Administration, vol. 100, no. 2, pp. 427–443, 2022, doi: 10.1111/padm.12739. Wiley

[30] S. Khan, R. Umer, S. Umer, and S. Naqvi, “Antecedents of trust in using social media for e-government services: An empirical study in Pakistan,” Technology in Society, vol. 64, Art. no. 101400, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101400. ScienceDirect

How to cite this paper

Mohamed Hanifa "User-Centered Mobile Application Design for Standards, Compliance, and Regulatory Services in Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 3 2026 Page 2762-2774
Mohamed Hanifa "User-Centered Mobile Application Design for Standards, Compliance, and Regulatory Services in Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 3, Sep. 2026
Mohamed Hanifa (2026). User-Centered Mobile Application Design for Standards, Compliance, and Regulatory Services in Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(3).
Mohamed Hanifa "User-Centered Mobile Application Design for Standards, Compliance, and Regulatory Services in Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 3, Sep. 2026.
@article{1723407,
      author = {Mohamed Hanifa},
      title = {User-Centered Mobile Application Design for Standards, Compliance, and Regulatory Services in Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {2762-2774},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723407.pdf},
      abstract = {Background: Saudi Arabia's digital transformation has shifted many public interactions from office-based transactions to mobile and integrated digital services. Standards, compliance, licensing and regulatory services are especially demanding because users must interpret formal requirements, submit evidence, understand status changes and act within prescribed time limits. A technically functional application can therefore fail if its information architecture, language, error handling or trust cues do not match the user's decision process. Objective: This review synthesises recent evidence on user-centred mobile government, accessibility, digital trust, regulatory technology and citizen-centric service design to identify design principles for mobile standards and compliance services in Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030. 
Methods: A structured integrative review was undertaken using 30 peer-reviewed, DOI-verified sources published from 2020 to 2025. Evidence was coded across usability, regulatory clarity, accessibility, trust, service integration and continuous improvement, then translated into a design framework for high-consequence public service journeys. Results: The synthesis indicates that effective regulatory applications require more than simplified screens. They should convert rules into task-based pathways, make obligations and consequences visible at the point of action, support Arabic-first and accessible interaction, provide traceable status and evidence handling, minimise avoidable data entry, and expose clear routes for correction and human support. Conclusions: User-centred design can operate as a governance mechanism as well as an interface discipline. When regulatory logic, accessibility, trust and service orchestration are designed together, mobile services can reduce administrative burden while strengthening consistency, transparency and compliance outcomes.},
      keywords = {user-centred design; mobile government; regulatory services; compliance; Saudi Arabia; Vision 2030},
      month = {September},
  }