The Digital Multinational Enterprise: Orchestration Theory as a Framework for Understanding Redefined Firm Boundaries and Strategy

References

[1] E. Autio, R. Mudambi, and Y. Yoo, “Digitalization and globalization in a changing world: Orchestrating the future of international business,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2021.

[2] E. R. Banalieva and C. Dhanaraj, “Internalization theory for the digital economy,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1372–1387, 2019, doi: 10.1057/s41267-019-00243-7. Springer

[3] J. Barney, “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage,” Journal of Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 99–120, 1991.

[4] H. Berry, M. F. Guillén, and N. Zhou, “An institutional approach to cross-national distance,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1460–1480, 2010.

[5] J. Birkinshaw, “What does digitalization mean for the theory of the multinational enterprise?,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 623–637, 2022.

[6] K. D. Brouthers, K. D. Geisser, and F. Rothlauf, “Explaining the internationalization of ibusiness firms,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 513–534, 2016.

[7] K. D. Brouthers, Z. Li, and D. Rottig, “Digital platforms and the internationalization of SMEs,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1–20, 2022.

[8] P. J. Buckley and M. Casson, The Future of the Multinational Enterprise. London, U.K.: Macmillan, 1976.

[9] P. J. Buckley, P. Enderwick, and A. R. Cross, “Geopolitics and the multinational enterprise: A research agenda,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2024.

[10] J. Cantwell, “A survey of theories of international production,” in The Nature of the Transnational Firm, C. Pitelis and R. Sugden, Eds. London, U.K.: Routledge, 1991.

[11] Y. Chen, L. Li, J. Sun, and Z. Xiao, “Digital transformation and firm boundary reshaping: Based on the dispersion of subsidiaries,” Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 948–969, 2024.

[12] R. H. Coase, “The nature of the firm,” Economica, vol. 4, no. 16, pp. 386–405, 1937.

[13] V. Cui, I. Vertinsky, and Y. Wang, “Geopolitical risk and MNE strategy: A review and research agenda,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 1–25, 2023.

[14] C. Dhanaraj and A. Parkhe, “Orchestrating innovation networks,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 659–669, 2006.

[15] J. H. Dunning, “Toward an eclectic theory of international production,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 9–31, 1980.

[16] M. Forsgren and U. Holm, “Controlling without owning: The role of quasi-internalization in multinational corporations,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1–20, 2021.

[17] P. Gammeltoft and A. Panibratov, “Geopolitical risk and MNE strategy: Regional and global responses,” Journal of World Business, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 101–118, 2024.

[18] P. Ghauri, R. Strange, and F. L. Cooke, “Sustainability and the multinational enterprise,” Journal of World Business, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 101–118, 2021.

[19] P. Ghemawat, “Distance still matters,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 79, no. 8, pp. 137–147, 2001.

[20] P. N. Gooderham, B. Grøgaard, and O. Nordhaug, “Digital transformation and legacy constraints in multinational enterprises,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1–22, 2023.

[21] J. F. Hennart, A Theory of Multinational Enterprise. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press, 1982.

[22] J. F. Hennart, “Explaining the swollen middle: Why most transactions are a mix of ‘market’ and ‘hierarchy’,” Organization Science, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 529–547, 1993.

[23] M. A. Hitt, R. M. Holmes, and J. L. Arregle, “The liability of foreignness and the role of geopolitical risk,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 2021.

[24] S. H. Hymer, The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1976. [Original work completed 1960.]

[25] Y. Luo, “New OLI advantages in digital globalization,” International Business Review, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 101–115, 2021.

[26] Y. Luo, “Geopolitical dynamics and the digital transformation of international business,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1–18, 2022.

[27] Y. Luo, “Techno-nationalism and the future of global business,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2024.

[28] S. Monaghan, E. Tippmann, and N. Coviello, “Born digitals: A new type of international new venture?,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1292–1313, 2019.

[29] S. Nambisan and Y. Luo, “Digital ecosystems and the internationalization of firms,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1–20, 2021.

[30] E. C. Nwokoro, V. C. Ayozie-Samuel, J. E. Osuchukwu, and D. O. Ozuzu, “Emerging technologies: Digital inclusion and skills development for women and youths in Africa,” 2024.

[31] C. H. Oh and J. Oetzel, “Geopolitical risk and global value chains,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 1–18, 2023.

[32] C. N. Pitelis and D. J. Teece, “Cross-border market co-creation, dynamic capabilities and the entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise,” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1247–1270, 2010.

[33] C. N. Pitelis and D. J. Teece, “The dynamic capabilities of the multinational enterprise,” in Advances in International Marketing, vol. 28, L. Leonidou, C. Katsikeas, S. Samiee, and B. Aykol, Eds. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald, 2018, pp. 1–28.

[34] M. E. Porter and J. E. Heppelmann, “How smart, connected products are transforming competition,” Harvard Business Review, vol. 92, no. 11, pp. 64–88, 2014.

[35] A. M. Rugman, “Internalization theory and corporate international finance,” California Management Review, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 73–79, 1980.

[36] Saittakari, T. Ritvala, and A. Salmi, “Geopolitical risk and MNE strategy: A review and research agenda,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1–22, 2023.

[37] P. J. Schotter and D. S. Andrews, “Digital sovereignty and the multinational enterprise,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 1–18, 2024.

[38] D. Shapiro, B. Hobdari, and C. H. Oh, “Natural resources and the multinational enterprise,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1–18, 2018.

[39] S. K. Sia, C. Soh, and P. Weill, “How DBS bank pursued a digital business strategy,” MIS Quarterly Executive, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 105–121, 2016.

[40] D. G. Sirmon, M. A. Hitt, and R. D. Ireland, “Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 273–292, 2009.

[41] M. Stallkamp and A. P. J. Schotter, “Platforms without borders? The international strategies of digital platform firms,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1–28, 2021.

[42] M. Stallkamp, R. A. Hunt, and A. P. J. Schotter, “Liability of outsidership in digital platform internationalization,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 1–20, 2022.

[43] D. J. Teece, The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer. Cambridge, MA, USA: Ballinger, 1976.

[44] D. J. Teece, “Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how,” Economic Journal, vol. 87, no. 346, pp. 242–261, 1977.

[45] D. J. Teece, “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy,” Research Policy, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 285–305, 1986.

[46] D. J. Teece, “Reflections on ‘profiting from innovation’,” Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 1131–1146, 2006.

[47] D. J. Teece and C. N. Pitelis, “Orchestration theory of the multinational enterprise in digital platform and AI ecosystems,” Management International Review, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1–35, 2026.

[48] Wernerfelt, “A resource-based view of the firm,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 171–180, 1984.

[49] O. E. Williamson, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 1975.

[50] O. E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York, NY, USA: Free Press, 1985.

[51] S. Zaheer, “The liability of foreignness, redux: A commentary,” Journal of International Management, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 351–358, 2002.

@article{1723432,
      author = {Chibueze Uzoma Chibundu, Onyinyechi Henrietta Usoh, Okechukwu Uzoma Iheme, Esther Dominic Peter, Lilian Amarachi Osuchukwu; Emmanuella Chinenye Nwokoro},
      title = {The Digital Multinational Enterprise: Orchestration Theory as a Framework for Understanding Redefined Firm Boundaries and Strategy},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {2797-2806},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723432.pdf},
      abstract = {The emergence of digital platforms, artificial intelligence, and ecosystem-based competition has fundamentally altered the competitive landscape within which multinational enterprises (MNEs) operate. This review examines how traditional internalization theory, while remaining influential, exhibits important limitations when applied to contemporary digital and AI-intensive environments. Building on recent theoretical developments, the review advances orchestration theory as a broader framework that conceptualizes the MNE as an entrepreneurial focal firm that coordinates distributed systems of assets, capabilities, and relationships across national and organizational boundaries. The review synthesizes recent scholarship demonstrating that competitive advantage increasingly derives from ecosystem coordination, the management of complementarities, and technologically mediated forms of control rather than ownership-based governance alone. It further examines how geopolitical fragmentation and regulatory divergence shape MNE orchestration strategies. The review concludes by identifying implications for international business scholarships and future research directions.},
      keywords = {Digital, Multinational enterprises, management, strategy.},
      month = {September},
  }