International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723477

1723477 Vol 10 · Issue 3 Download Paper

Probabilistic Approach of Petroleum Reserves Estimation

Amaka Mirian Oti Adaobi Stephenie Nwosi-Anele Ikechi Igwe

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Petroleum Economics

Abstract

The study evaluates probabilistic modeling for accurate estimation and classification of petroleum reserves for strategic decision-making, financial planning, and regulatory compliance in the oil and gas sector. Traditional deterministic methods, which use single-point estimates for reservoir and economic parameters, often fail to reflect the full range of uncertainty in subsurface and market conditions. In this study, a probabilistic approach was applied using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations to model uncertainties in key reservoir parameters such as porosity with range of (12–22%), water saturation (25–40%), net thickness (15–30 m), formation volume factor (1.05–1.35), and recovery factor (25–38%)—as well as economic variables including oil price ($55–$85/bbl), operational expenditure (OPEX), capital expenditure (CAPEX), and discount rate (8–14%).The simulation produced recoverable reserves estimates of P90 = 4.5 MMbbl, P50 =11.92 MMbbl, and P10 = 21.39 MMbbl, compared to a deterministic estimate of 12 MMbbl. Corresponding Net Present Values (NPVs) at a 10% discount rate were P90 = $14.80 million, P50 = $17.29 million, and P10 = $21.51 million, with an Expected Monetary Value (EMV) P90 = $12.58 million, P50 = $14.69 million, and P10 = $17.05 million. Sensitivity analysis revealed oil price and discount rate as the most influential drivers of economic outcomes, followed by recovery factors. Compared to deterministic estimates, the probabilistic method reduced uncertainty by quantifying confidence levels. The results demonstrate that probabilistic techniques provide novel approach to risk-adjusted investment decisions.

Keywords

Expected Monetary Value, Net Present Value, Discount rate, Operating Expenditure, Sensitivity

References

[1] O. C. Adeigbe, I. F. Odedere, and O. I. Amodu, “Quantifying the uncertainty in the ultimate recoverable oil reserves using the Monte Carlo simulation techniques from ‘OWA’ Marginal Field, Onshore Niger Delta, Nigeria,” Geology, Geophysics and Environment, vol. 44, no. 4, p. 401, 2018. Geology, Geophysics and Environment

[2] Y. Cheng, Y. Wang, D. A. McVay, and W. J. Lee, “Practical application of a probabilistic approach to estimate reserves using production decline data,” SPE Economics & Management, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 19–31, 2010. SPE

[3] F. Demirmen, “Reserves estimation: The challenge for the industry,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2007.

[4] R. S. Divi, “Probabilistic methods in petroleum resource assessment, with some examples using data from the Arabian region,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 42, nos. 2–4, pp. 95–106, 2004. ScienceDirect

[5] Ö. Eriçok and F. Gümrah, “Naturally fractured carbonate oil reservoir: Reserve estimation study,” Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 697–714, 2010. Taylor & Francis

[6] M. Galvao, L. Hastenreiter, J. Molina, A. Quadros, J. Montechiari, and S. Hamacher, “Probabilistic reserves and resources estimation: A methodology for aggregating probabilistic petroleum reserves and resources,” in SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, 2012. SPE

[7] B. Harrison and G. Falcone, “Are we reasonably certain that reasonable certainty adequately defines uncertainty in our reserves estimates?” in SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, 2017. SPE

[8] A. Jochen and S. A. Holditch, “Probabilistic reserves estimation using decline curve analysis with the bootstrap method,” in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 1996.

[9] C. Karacaer and M. Onur, “Analytical probabilistic reserve estimation by volumetric method and aggregation of resources,” in SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium, SPE-162875-MS, 2012.

[10] R. S. Khisamov, A. F. Safarov, A. M. Kalimullin, and A. A. Dryagalkina, “Probabilistic-statistical estimation of reserves and resources according to the international classification SPE-PRMS,” Georesursy, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 158–164, 2018. Georesursy

[11] P. J. Lee, Statistical methods for estimating petroleum resources. Oxford University Press, 2008.

[12] I. Mohammed, H. Abdurahman, S. D. Ibrahim, and B. M. Adamu, “Uncertainty modelling in multi-layered reserve estimation using Monte Carlo simulation,” in SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition, 2018. SPE

[13] C. Ngu, K. F. Fozao, M. A. Onabid, L. T. Nkwanyang, and Z. Akongneh, “Uncertainty quantification in 3D static modeling: Improving reserve estimation accuracy with adaptive physics-informed Monte Carlo simulation in Y-field, Niger Delta Basin, Nigeria,” Oil and Gas Open, vol. 12, Art. no. 100122, 2026.

[14] G. Quirk, M. J. Howe, and S. G. Archer, “A combined deterministic-probabilistic method of estimating undiscovered hydrocarbon resources,” Journal of Petroleum Geology, 2017.

[15] P. R. Rose, Risk analysis and management of petroleum exploration ventures (AAPG Methods in Exploration Series No. 12). Tulsa, OK: American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 2001.

[16] J. H. Snow, A. G. Doré, and D. W. Dorn-Lopez, “Risk analysis and full-cycle probabilistic modelling of prospects: A prototype system developed for the Norwegian shelf,” Norwegian Petroleum Society Special Publications, vol. 6, pp. 153–165, 1996. ScienceDirect

[17] M. Wallace, “Deriving proven oil reserves: Comments on the Monte Carlo simulation procedure,” Journal of Energy Resources Technology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 62–65, 1993.

[18] P. F. Worthington, “A road map for improving the technical basis for the estimation of petroleum reserves,” Petroleum Geoscience, vol. 13, 2007.

How to cite this paper

Amaka Mirian Oti, Adaobi Stephenie Nwosi-Anele, Ikechi Igwe "Probabilistic Approach of Petroleum Reserves Estimation" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 3 2026 Page 3315-3327
Amaka Mirian Oti, Adaobi Stephenie Nwosi-Anele, Ikechi Igwe "Probabilistic Approach of Petroleum Reserves Estimation" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 3, Sep. 2026
Amaka Mirian Oti, Adaobi Stephenie Nwosi-Anele, Ikechi Igwe (2026). Probabilistic Approach of Petroleum Reserves Estimation. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(3).
Amaka Mirian Oti, Adaobi Stephenie Nwosi-Anele, Ikechi Igwe "Probabilistic Approach of Petroleum Reserves Estimation" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 3, Sep. 2026.
@article{1723477,
      author = {Amaka Mirian Oti, Adaobi Stephenie Nwosi-Anele, Ikechi Igwe},
      title = {Probabilistic Approach of Petroleum Reserves Estimation},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {3315-3327},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723477.pdf},
      abstract = {The study evaluates probabilistic modeling for accurate estimation and classification of petroleum reserves for strategic decision-making, financial planning, and regulatory compliance in the oil and gas sector. Traditional deterministic methods, which use single-point estimates for reservoir and economic parameters, often fail to reflect the full range of uncertainty in subsurface and market conditions. In this study, a probabilistic approach was applied using Monte Carlo simulation with 10,000 iterations to model uncertainties in key reservoir parameters such as porosity with range of  (12–22%), water saturation (25–40%), net thickness (15–30 m), formation volume factor (1.05–1.35), and recovery factor (25–38%)—as well as economic variables including oil price ($55–$85/bbl), operational expenditure (OPEX), capital expenditure (CAPEX), and discount rate (8–14%).The simulation produced recoverable reserves estimates of P90 = 4.5 MMbbl, P50 =11.92 MMbbl, and P10 = 21.39 MMbbl, compared to a deterministic estimate of 12 MMbbl. Corresponding Net Present Values (NPVs) at a 10% discount rate were P90 = $14.80 million, P50 = $17.29 million, and P10 = $21.51 million, with an Expected Monetary Value (EMV) P90 = $12.58 million, P50 = $14.69 million, and P10 = $17.05 million. Sensitivity analysis revealed oil price and discount rate as the most influential drivers of economic outcomes, followed by recovery factors. Compared to deterministic estimates, the probabilistic method reduced uncertainty by quantifying confidence levels. The results demonstrate that probabilistic techniques provide novel approach to risk-adjusted investment decisions.},
      keywords = {Expected Monetary Value, Net Present Value, Discount rate, Operating Expenditure, Sensitivity},
      month = {September},
  }