Predictive Risk Intelligence and Early-Warning Systems for Saudi Giga-Projects: Strengthening Business Continuity and Adaptive Crisis Response

References

[1] C. Boje, A. Guerriero, S. Kubicki, and Y. Rezgui, “Towards a semantic Construction Digital Twin: Directions for future research,” Automation in Construction, vol. 114, Art. no. 103179, 2020. ScienceDirect

[2] R. Sacks, I. Brilakis, E. Pikas, H. S. Xie, and M. Girolami, “Construction with digital twin information systems,” Data-Centric Engineering, vol. 1, Art. no. e14, 2020. Cambridge

[3] D.-G. J. Opoku, S. Perera, R. Osei-Kyei, and M. Rashidi, “Digital twin application in the construction industry: A literature review,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 40, Art. no. 102726, 2021. ScienceDirect

[4] Z. Liu, A. Li, Z. Sun, G. Shi, and X. Meng, “Digital Twin-Based Risk Control during Prefabricated Building Hoisting Operations,” Sensors, vol. 22, Art. no. 2522, 2022. MDPI

[5] A. Moussa, M. Ezzeldin, and W. El-Dakhakhni, “Predicting and managing risk interactions and systemic risks in infrastructure projects using machine learning,” Automation in Construction, vol. 168, Art. no. 105836, 2024. ScienceDirect

[6] A. N. Egwim, H. Alaka, L. O. Toriola-Coker, H. Balogun, and F. Sunmola, “Applied artificial intelligence for predicting construction projects delay,” Machine Learning with Applications, vol. 6, Art. no. 100166, 2021. ScienceDirect

[7] K. Tian, Z. Zhu, J. Mbachu, M. Moorhead, and A. Ghanbaripour, “Artificial intelligence in construction risk management: a decade of developments, challenges, and integration pathways,” Journal of Risk Research, vol. 28, pp. 1078–1110, 2025. Taylor & Francis

[8] H. J. Pasman, “Early warning signals noticed, but management doesn't act adequately or not at all: a brief analysis and direction of possible improvement,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 70, Art. no. 104272, 2020. ScienceDirect

[9] A. Wang et al., “An investigation of key precursors of megaproject crises,” International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 15, pp. 938–959, 2022. Emerald

[10] D. Aghimien et al., “Assessment of early warning signs predisposing building projects to failure in Nigeria,” Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, vol. 18, pp. 1403–1423, 2020. Emerald

[11] J. Fang, D. Huang, and J. Xu, “Social Risk Early Warning of Environmental Damage of Large-Scale Construction Projects in China Based on Network Governance and LSTM Model,” Complexity, vol. 2020, Art. no. 8863997, 2020. Wiley

[12] R. Sun, Y. Liu, and J. Zhao, “Innovation Network Reconfiguration Makes Infrastructure Megaprojects More Resilient,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, vol. 2022, Art. no. 1727030, 2022. Wiley

[13] B. Mokline, “Organizational resilience as response to a crisis: case of COVID-19 crisis,” Continuity & Resilience Review, vol. 3, pp. 232–247, 2021. Emerald

[14] A. Mahmoudi, M. Abbasi, and X. Deng, “A novel project portfolio selection framework towards organizational resilience: Robust Ordinal Priority Approach,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 188, Art. no. 116067, 2022. ScienceDirect

[15] Malik, K. I. A. Khan, S. Qayyum, F. Ullah, and A. Maqsoom, “Resilient Capabilities to Tackle Supply Chain Risks: Managing Integration Complexities in Construction Projects,” Buildings, vol. 12, Art. no. 1322, 2022. MDPI

[16] S. Rao, M. Radanovic, Y. Liu, S. Hu, Y. Fang, K. Khoshelham, M. Palaniswami, and T. Ngo, “Real-time monitoring of construction sites: Sensors, methods, and applications,” Automation in Construction, vol. 136, Art. no. 104099, 2022. ScienceDirect

[17] M. Z. Shanti, C.-S. Cho, B. Garcia de Soto, Y.-J. Byon, C. Y. Yeun, and T. Y. Kim, “Real-time monitoring of work-at-height safety hazards in construction sites using drones and deep learning,” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 83, pp. 364–370, 2022. ScienceDirect

[18] W. Tian, J. Meng, X.-J. Zhong, and X. Tan, “Intelligent Early Warning System for Construction Safety of Excavations Adjacent to Existing Metro Tunnels,” Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2021, Art. no. 8833473, 2021. Wiley

[19] M. Kamari and Y. Ham, “AI-based risk assessment for construction site disaster preparedness through deep learning-based digital twinning,” Automation in Construction, vol. 134, Art. no. 104091, 2022. ScienceDirect

[20] A. Algumzi, “Risks and Challenges Associated with NEOM Project in Saudi Arabia: A Marketing Perspective,” Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 15, Art. no. 381, 2022. MDPI

[21] S. Alshihri, K. Al-Gahtani, and A. Almohsen, “Risk Factors That Lead to Time and Cost Overruns of Building Projects in Saudi Arabia,” Buildings, vol. 12, Art. no. 902, 2022. MDPI

[22] S. Alsulamy, “Predicting construction delay risks in Saudi Arabian projects: A comparative analysis of CatBoost, XGBoost, and LGBM,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 268, Art. no. 126268, 2025. ScienceDirect

[23] Y. Han et al., “Literature review of digital twin technologies for civil infrastructure,” Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience, vol. 2, Art. no. 100050, 2023. ScienceDirect

[24] F. Jiang et al., “A Review of Digital Twin Applications in Civil and Infrastructure Emergency Management,” Buildings, vol. 13, Art. no. 1143, 2023. MDPI

[25] Y. Wang, Q. Yue, X. Lu, D. Gu, Z. Xu, Y. Tian, and S. Zhang, “Digital twin approach for enhancing urban resilience: A cycle between virtual space and the real world,” Resilient Cities and Structures, vol. 3, pp. 34–45, 2024. ScienceDirect

[26] X. Li et al., “Digital twin-enabled synchronized construction management: A roadmap from construction 4.0 towards future prospect,” Developments in the Built Environment, vol. 19, Art. no. 100512, 2024. ScienceDirect

[27] A. Darko, A. P. C. Chan, Y. Yang, and M. O. Tetteh, “Building information modeling (BIM)-based modular integrated construction risk management - Critical survey and future needs,” Computers in Industry, vol. 123, Art. no. 103327, 2020. ScienceDirect

[28] Y. Junjia, A. H. Alias, N. A. Haron, and N. Abu Bakar, “Machine learning algorithms for safer construction sites: Critical review,” Building Engineering, vol. 2, Art. no. 544, 2024. Building Engineering

[29] L. Liao, C. Yang, and L. Quan, “Construction supply chain management: A systematic literature review and future development,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 382, Art. no. 135230, 2023. ScienceDirect

[30] A. M. Abdulmoneim, A. Al Samadony, and I. A. Nosair, “Identification and Ranking the Most Significant Risks of the Mega Construction Projects in Saudi Arabia,” Saudi Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 35–49, 2021. Saudi Journal of Civil Engineering

@article{1723505,
      author = {Qamar Shahzad},
      title = {Predictive Risk Intelligence and Early-Warning Systems for Saudi Giga-Projects: Strengthening Business Continuity and Adaptive Crisis Response},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {3092-3103},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723505.pdf},
      abstract = {Saudi Arabia’s giga-project programme concentrates exceptional capital, technological novelty, inter-organisational dependence and delivery pressure within projects that must remain operationally credible while their scope and environment continue to evolve. Conventional risk registers are necessary but insufficient in such settings because they largely describe known exposures at discrete review points. This review develops a predictive risk intelligence perspective in which heterogeneous project data are continuously converted into weak signals, forecast risk states and decision triggers that support business continuity before disruption becomes crisis. Thirty peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025 were synthesised across construction risk analytics, digital twins, real-time monitoring, megaproject crisis precursors, supply-chain resilience and organisational resilience. The synthesis shows that effective early warning depends less on a single algorithm than on a socio-technical architecture connecting reliable data, explainable models, threshold governance, escalation authority and pre-agreed continuity responses. Machine learning can improve prediction of delay, systemic risk and cyber exposure, while digital twins and sensor systems can provide near-real-time situational awareness. However, fragmented data ownership, model drift, weak interpretability and organisational reluctance to act on uncomfortable signals can neutralise technical capability. A five-layer Predictive Risk Intelligence and Adaptive Continuity framework is therefore proposed for Saudi giga-projects. It links sensing, risk inference, warning governance, continuity activation and organisational learning. The paper argues that predictive intelligence should be treated as a governance capability rather than a dashboard feature, with performance judged by decision lead time, false-warning control, response effectiveness and recovery adaptability.},
      keywords = {predictive risk intelligence; early-warning systems; Saudi giga-projects; business continuity; crisis response; digital twins; machine learning; organisational resilience; Vision 2030},
      month = {September},
  }