Recycled Materials and Sustainable Construction Chemicals for Low-Carbon Industrial Development in Saudi Arabia

References

[1] V. W. Y. Tam, H. Wattage, K. N. Le, A. Butera, and M. Soomro, “Methods to improve microstructural properties of recycled concrete aggregate: A critical review,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 270, Art. no. 121490, 2021. ScienceDirect

[2] B. Wang, L. Yan, Q. Fu, and B. Kasal, “A Comprehensive Review on Recycled Aggregate and Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 171, Art. no. 105565, 2021. ScienceDirect

[3] G. S. d. Reis, M. Quattrone, W. M. Ambrós, et al., “Current Applications of Recycled Aggregates from Construction and Demolition: A Review,” Materials, vol. 14, no. 7, Art. no. 1700, 2021. MDPI

[4] N. Makul, R. Fediuk, M. Amran, A. M. Zeyad, S. Klyuev, I. Chulkova, T. Ozbakkaloglu, N. Vatin, M. Karelina, and A. Azevedo, “Design Strategy for Recycled Aggregate Concrete: A Review of Status and Future Perspectives,” Crystals, vol. 11, no. 6, Art. no. 695, 2021. MDPI

[5] A. M. Grabiec, J. Kim, A. Ubysz, and P. Bilbao, “Some Remarks towards a Better Understanding of the Use of Concrete Recycled Aggregate: A Review,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 23, Art. no. 13336, 2021. MDPI

[6] S. K. Kirthika, S. K. Singh, and A. Chourasia, “Recycling of industrial and agricultural wastes as alternative coarse aggregates: A step towards cleaner production of concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 287, Art. no. 123056, 2021. ScienceDirect

[7] A. Piemonti, A. Conforti, L. Cominoli, S. Sorlini, A. Luciano, and G. Plizzari, “Use of Iron and Steel Slags in Concrete: State of the Art and Future Perspectives,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 2, Art. no. 556, 2021. MDPI

[8] S. R. da Silva and J. J. d. O. Andrade, “A Review on the Effect of Mechanical Properties and Durability of Concrete with Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) and Fly Ash in the Production of New Cement Concrete,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 11, Art. no. 6740, 2022. MDPI

[9] J. A. Mesa, C. Fúquene-Retamoso, and A. Maury-Ramírez, “Life Cycle Assessment on Construction and Demolition Waste: A Systematic Literature Review,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 14, Art. no. 7676, 2021. MDPI

[10] C. Zhang, M. Hu, L. Dong, A. Gebremariam, B. Miranda-Xicotencatl, F. Di Maio, and A. Tukker, “Life cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete on its environmental impacts: A critical review,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 317, Art. no. 125950, 2022. ScienceDirect

[11] M. H. Alzard, H. El-Hassan, and T. El-Maaddawy, “Environmental and Economic Life Cycle Assessment of Recycled Aggregates Concrete in the United Arab Emirates,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 18, Art. no. 10348, 2021. MDPI

[12] H. Alhazmi, S. A. R. Shah, and A. Mahmood, “Sustainable Development of Innovative Green Construction Materials: A Study for Economical Eco-Friendly Recycled Aggregate Based Geopolymer Concrete,” Materials, vol. 13, no. 21, Art. no. 4881, 2020. MDPI

[13] B. S. Thomas, J. Yang, A. Bahurudeen, S. N. Chinnu, J. A. Abdalla, R. A. Hawileh, and H. M. Hamada, “Geopolymer concrete incorporating recycled aggregates: A comprehensive review,” Cleaner Materials, vol. 3, Art. no. 100056, 2022. ScienceDirect

[14] H. U. Ahmed, A. A. Mohammed, S. Rafiq, A. S. Mohammed, A. Mosavi, N. H. Sor, and S. M. A. Qaidi, “Compressive Strength of Sustainable Geopolymer Concrete Composites: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 24, Art. no. 13502, 2021. MDPI

[15] L. S. Wong, “Durability Performance of Geopolymer Concrete: A Review,” Polymers, vol. 14, no. 5, Art. no. 868, 2022. MDPI

[16] N. M. Azad and S. M. S. M. K. Samarakoon, “Utilization of Industrial By-Products/Waste to Manufacture Geopolymer Cement/Concrete,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 2, Art. no. 873, 2021. MDPI

[17] M. Sharma, S. Bishnoi, F. Martirena, and K. Scrivener, “Limestone calcined clay cement and concrete: A state-of-the-art review,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 149, Art. no. 106564, 2021. ScienceDirect

[18] F. Zunino, Y. Dhandapani, M. Ben Haha, J. Skibsted, S. Joseph, et al., “Hydration and mixture design of calcined clay blended cements: review by the RILEM TC 282-CCL,” Materials and Structures, vol. 55, Art. no. 234, 2022. Springer

[19] D. Ndahirwa, H. Zmamou, H. Lenormand, and N. Leblanc, “The role of supplementary cementitious materials in hydration, durability and shrinkage of cement-based materials, their environmental and economic benefits: A review,” Cleaner Materials, vol. 5, Art. no. 100123, 2022. ScienceDirect

[20] S. Gupta and S. Chaudhary, “State of the art review on supplementary cementitious materials in India – II: Characteristics of SCMs, effect on concrete and environmental impact,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 357, Art. no. 131945, 2022. ScienceDirect

[21] M. N. N. Khan, A. K. Saha, and P. K. Sarker, “Reuse of waste glass as a supplementary binder and aggregate for sustainable cement-based construction materials: A review,” Journal of Building Engineering, vol. 28, Art. no. 101052, 2020. ScienceDirect

[22] P. Guo, W. Meng, H. Nassif, H. Gou, and Y. Bao, “New perspectives on recycling waste glass in manufacturing concrete for sustainable civil infrastructure,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 257, Art. no. 119579, 2020. ScienceDirect

[23] W. Dong, W. Li, and Z. Tao, “A comprehensive review on performance of cementitious and geopolymeric concretes with recycled waste glass as powder, sand or cullet,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 172, Art. no. 105664, 2021. ScienceDirect

[24] A. Omran and A. Tagnit-Hamou, “Long-term field performance of concrete produced with powder waste glass as partial replacement of cement,” Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 15, Art. no. e00745, 2021. ScienceDirect

[25] R. Ma, Y. Wang, H. Li, and Y. Bai, “Progress in the polycarboxylate superplasticizer and their structure-activity relationship – A review,” Materials Today Communications, vol. 35, Art. no. 105838, 2023. ScienceDirect

[26] F. Bolzoni, A. Brenna, and M. Ormellese, “Recent advances in the use of inhibitors to prevent chloride-induced corrosion in reinforced concrete,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 154, Art. no. 106719, 2022. ScienceDirect

[27] S. Yuvaraj, K. Nirmalkumar, V. Rajesh Kumar, R. Gayathri, K. Mukilan, and S. Shubikksha, “Influence of corrosion inhibitors in reinforced concrete – A state of art of review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 68, pp. 2406–2412, 2022. ScienceDirect

[28] J. Ahmad, A. Majdi, A. B. Elhag, A. F. Deifalla, M. Soomro, H. F. Isleem, and S. Qaidi, “A Step towards Sustainable Concrete with Substitution of Plastic Waste in Concrete: Overview on Mechanical, Durability and Microstructure Analysis,” Crystals, vol. 12, no. 7, Art. no. 944, 2022. MDPI

[29] P. Zhang, Y. Yang, J. Wang, S. Hu, M. Jiao, and Y. Ling, “Mechanical Properties and Durability of Polypropylene and Steel Fiber-Reinforced Recycled Aggregates Concrete (FRRAC): A Review,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 22, Art. no. 9509, 2020. MDPI

[30] X. Yao, Z. Pei, H. Zheng, Q. Guan, F. Wang, S. Wang, and Y. Ji, “Review of Mechanical and Temperature Properties of Fiber Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 8, Art. no. 1224, 2022. MDPI

@article{1723549,
      author = {Anzad Batharudeen Kutty},
      title = {Recycled Materials and Sustainable Construction Chemicals for Low-Carbon Industrial Development in Saudi Arabia},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {3473-3484},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723549.pdf},
      abstract = {Saudi Arabia’s industrial growth offers two key materials challenges: reducing the embodied carbon of construction and diverting mineral, glass, polymeric, metallurgical, and construction-and-demolition waste from disposal. This review analyzes how recycled materials and sustainable construction chemicals can be integrated as a unified low-carbon strategy, rather than as separate innovations. It synthesizes 2020–2025 literature on recycled aggregates, recycled powders and glass, supplementary cementitious materials, alkali-activated binders, limestone-calcined-clay systems, and performance-enhancing chemicals such as polycarboxylate superplasticizers and corrosion inhibitors. The review focuses on the Saudi context, where high temperatures, chloride-rich coastal environments, long transport distances, rapid project schedules, and evolving circular-economy goals influence the balance between the laboratory results and real-world implementation. Results show that carbon reduction is greatest when high-volume mineral substitution is combined with admixtures that maintain workability, reduce water demand, manage durability risks, and extend service life. While recycled aggregate reduces demand for natural resources, it can increase porosity and binder requirements; therefore, effective treatment, grading, and use of low-clinker binders are essential. Waste glass and finely processed demolition powders can serve as aggregates or reactive components, but particle size, alkali-silica reaction control, and source consistency are critical. Alkali-activated and limestone-calcined-clay binders enable further clinker reduction, making chemical compatibility increasingly important as binder chemistry differs from ordinary Portland cement. A successful Saudi transition ought to prioritize performance-based specifications, regional material passports, verified life-cycle assessments, local beneficiation infrastructure, and procurement policies that reward whole-life carbon reduction rather than nominal recycled content. The paper concludes with a governance framework that links waste streams, binder design, chemical admixtures, durability qualification, and industrial-scale deployment.},
      keywords = {Recycled materials; sustainable construction chemicals; low-carbon concrete; circular economy; Saudi Arabia; construction and demolition waste; supplementary cementitious materials; Vision 2030},
      month = {September},
  }