International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
[email protected]•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723597

1723597 Vol 10 · Issue 4 Download Paper

Corporate Governance and Firm Value in BRICS: A Cross-Country Analysis of Board Structure, Ownership, and ESG Practices

Mustapha Mustapha Bunu

Subject area: Management and Commerce  ·  Area of research: Corporate Governance and Firm Value

DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I4-1723597

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between corporate governance and firm value across the BRICS economies Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa using a sample of 46 large-cap listed firms. We construct a composite Corporate Governance Index (CGI) incorporating board structure, ownership concentration, CEO duality, female director representation, and ESG scores. Our cross-sectional analysis reveals substantial cross-country heterogeneity in governance quality: South Africa and China exhibit the highest mean CGI scores (72.4), while Brazil and India lag behind (57.4 and 60.6, respectively). We document a positive relationship between CGI and Tobin’s Q, but this relationship is contingent on ownership structure and institutional context. Importantly, SOEs are associated with higher CGI scores but lower market valuations, which suggests that formal governance mechanisms may be used to serve political objectives rather than maximizing firm value. We further find that ESG scores complement rather than substitute for traditional governance metrics in predicting firm value. Our findings demonstrate that governance effectiveness is institutionally embedded and reforms cannot be transplanted from developed markets without accounting for local institutional contexts.

Keywords

Corporate governance, BRICS, firm value, Tobin’s Q, board independence, ownership concentration, ESG, state ownership, emerging markets

How to cite this paper

Mustapha Mustapha Bunu "Corporate Governance and Firm Value in BRICS: A Cross-Country Analysis of Board Structure, Ownership, and ESG Practices" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 4 2026 Page 220-227 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1723597
Mustapha Mustapha Bunu "Corporate Governance and Firm Value in BRICS: A Cross-Country Analysis of Board Structure, Ownership, and ESG Practices" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1723597
Mustapha Mustapha Bunu (2026). Corporate Governance and Firm Value in BRICS: A Cross-Country Analysis of Board Structure, Ownership, and ESG Practices. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1723597
Mustapha Mustapha Bunu "Corporate Governance and Firm Value in BRICS: A Cross-Country Analysis of Board Structure, Ownership, and ESG Practices" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1723597
@article{1723597,
      author = {Mustapha Mustapha Bunu},
      title = {Corporate Governance and Firm Value in BRICS: A Cross-Country Analysis of Board Structure, Ownership, and ESG Practices},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {4},
      pages = {220-227},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723597.pdf},
      abstract = {This study examines the relationship between corporate governance and firm value across the BRICS economies Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa using a sample of 46 large-cap listed firms. We construct a composite Corporate Governance Index (CGI) incorporating board structure, ownership concentration, CEO duality, female director representation, and ESG scores. Our cross-sectional analysis reveals substantial cross-country heterogeneity in governance quality: South Africa and China exhibit the highest mean CGI scores (72.4), while Brazil and India lag behind (57.4 and 60.6, respectively). We document a positive relationship between CGI and Tobin’s Q, but this relationship is contingent on ownership structure and institutional context. Importantly, SOEs are associated with higher CGI scores but lower market valuations, which suggests that formal governance mechanisms may be used to serve political objectives rather than maximizing firm value. We further find that ESG scores complement rather than substitute for traditional governance metrics in predicting firm value. Our findings demonstrate that governance effectiveness is institutionally embedded and reforms cannot be transplanted from developed markets without accounting for local institutional contexts.},
      keywords = {Corporate governance, BRICS, firm value, Tobin’s Q, board independence, ownership concentration, ESG, state ownership, emerging markets},
      month = {October},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1723597}
  }