International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723683

1723683 Vol 10 · Issue 4 Download Paper

Cost Analysis of Malaria Prevention and Treatment Among Pregnant Women With Under-Five Children Attending Antenatal Clinics in Public And Private Health Care Facilities in AMAC, Abuja, Nigeria

Ehon, Idialu Anthony, Ph.D.

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Health Economics and Financing

Abstract

Malaria remains a major public health and health-financing challenge in Nigeria, with pregnant women experiencing increased vulnerability to infection and its associated maternal and neonatal complications. Evidence on the magnitude of these differences in the Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC) remains limited. This study assessed the perceived cost, accessibility and affordability of malaria prevention and treatment services among pregnant women attending selected public and private antenatal clinics in AMAC, Abuja, Nigeria. Methods - A comparative cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 300 pregnant women attending antenatal care in selected public and private health facilities across five wards of AMAC: Gwarinpa, Jikwoyi, Nyanya, Karu and Kabusa. The final analytical sample comprised 150 women attending public facilities and 150 attending private facilities. Participants were selected using a multistage sampling approach. Data were collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire covering sociodemographic characteristics, malaria prevention and treatment costs, perceived accessibility and perceived affordability. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics and outcomes. Chi-square tests assessed associations between sociodemographic characteristics and perceived cost/accessibility, while independent-samples t-tests compared mean costs and perception scores between public and private facilities. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results - The majority of respondents were aged 25–34 years (58.3%), married (85.0%), and had at least secondary education (83.3%). Women attending private facilities were more likely to have tertiary education and higher household income, whereas lower-income respondents were disproportionately represented in public facilities. The mean reported cost of malaria prevention was ₦2,450 (SD ₦850) in public facilities compared with ₦4,600 (SD ₦1,100) in private facilities, representing an absolute difference of ₦2,150 (t=-18.72, p<0.001). Similarly, mean malaria treatment cost was ₦4,850 (SD ₦1,450) in public facilities and ₦8,100 (SD ₦1,750) in private facilities, a difference of ₦3,250 (t=-17.35, p<0.001). Perceived accessibility was significantly higher among public-facility attendees (mean 3.28, SD 0.72) than private-facility attendees (mean 2.82, SD 0.64; t=5.87, p<0.001). Perceived affordability was also significantly higher in public facilities (mean 3.76, SD 0.81) than private facilities (mean 2.88, SD 0.84; t=9.24, p<0.001). Educational attainment, occupation, household income and ward of residence were significantly associated with perceived prevention and treatment costs and accessibility. Conclusion - Malaria prevention and treatment among pregnant women in AMAC impose substantially higher reported financial costs in private healthcare facilities than in public facilities. Socioeconomic position and geographical location were important determinants of perceived cost and accessibility. Strengthening public-sector malaria financing, expanding financial-risk protection, improving commodity availability and establishing effective public–private malaria service arrangements could reduce financial barriers and promote more equitable access to malaria services during pregnancy.

Keywords

Malaria; pregnancy; cost analysis; health economics; antenatal care; affordability; accessibility; out-of-pocket expenditure; public health facilities; private health facilities; Nigeria; Abuja.

References

[1] World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2025. Geneva: WHO; 2025. WHO

[2] World Health Organization. Malaria 2025: Nigeria Country Profile. Geneva: WHO; 2026. WHO

[3] World Health Organization. Intermittent preventive treatment to reduce the risk of malaria during pregnancy. Geneva: WHO; 2023.

[4] World Health Organization. Updated WHO recommendations for malaria chemoprevention and elimination. Geneva: WHO; 2022. WHO

[5] World Health Organization. Updated WHO recommendations for malaria chemoprevention among children and pregnant women. Geneva: WHO; 2022. WHO

[6] World Health Organization. Community deployment of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine: a field guide. Geneva: WHO; 2024. WHO

[7] World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Geneva: WHO.

[8] World Health Organization. WHO policy brief for implementation of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy using sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. Geneva: WHO. WHO

[9] Uzochukwu BSC, Chukwuogo OI, Onwujekwe OE, Uguru NP. The economic burden of malaria on households and the health system in Enugu State, Southeast Nigeria. Malaria Journal. [Study examining household and provider costs of malaria].

[10] Onwujekwe O, et al. Investigating payment coping mechanisms used for treatment of uncomplicated malaria among different socioeconomic groups in Nigeria.

[11] Inequities in incidence, morbidity and expenditures on prevention and treatment of malaria in southeast Nigeria.

[12] Quantifying the economic burden of malaria in Nigeria using the willingness-to-pay approach.

[13] The economic burden of malaria in Africa: a systematic review of cost-of-illness studies. Malaria Journal. 2025. doi:10.1186/s12936-025-05390-x.

[14] National Population Commission (NPC), ICF. Nigeria Malaria Indicator Survey 2021. Abuja, Nigeria and Rockville, Maryland: NPC and ICF.

[15] National Malaria Elimination Programme. National Malaria Strategic Plan 2021–2025. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria. National Malaria Elimination Programme

[16] Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria. National Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Malaria. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Health.

[17] National Malaria Elimination Programme. Nigeria Malaria Progress Report. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Health.

[18] World Health Organization. World Malaria Report 2024. Geneva: WHO; 2024. WHO

How to cite this paper

Ehon, Idialu Anthony, Ph.D. "Cost Analysis of Malaria Prevention and Treatment Among Pregnant Women With Under-Five Children Attending Antenatal Clinics in Public And Private Health Care Facilities in AMAC, Abuja, Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 4 2026 Page 434-450
Ehon, Idialu Anthony, Ph.D. "Cost Analysis of Malaria Prevention and Treatment Among Pregnant Women With Under-Five Children Attending Antenatal Clinics in Public And Private Health Care Facilities in AMAC, Abuja, Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 2026
Ehon, Idialu Anthony, Ph.D. (2026). Cost Analysis of Malaria Prevention and Treatment Among Pregnant Women With Under-Five Children Attending Antenatal Clinics in Public And Private Health Care Facilities in AMAC, Abuja, Nigeria. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(4).
Ehon, Idialu Anthony, Ph.D. "Cost Analysis of Malaria Prevention and Treatment Among Pregnant Women With Under-Five Children Attending Antenatal Clinics in Public And Private Health Care Facilities in AMAC, Abuja, Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 2026.
@article{1723683,
      author = {Ehon, Idialu Anthony, Ph.D.},
      title = {Cost Analysis of Malaria Prevention and Treatment Among Pregnant Women With Under-Five Children Attending Antenatal Clinics in Public And Private Health Care Facilities in AMAC, Abuja, Nigeria},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {4},
      pages = {434-450},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723683.pdf},
      abstract = {Malaria remains a major public health and health-financing challenge in Nigeria, with pregnant women experiencing increased vulnerability to infection and its associated maternal and neonatal complications. Evidence on the magnitude of these differences in the Abuja Municipal Area Council (AMAC) remains limited. This study assessed the perceived cost, accessibility and affordability of malaria prevention and treatment services among pregnant women attending selected public and private antenatal clinics in AMAC, Abuja, Nigeria.

Methods - A comparative cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 300 pregnant women attending antenatal care in selected public and private health facilities across five wards of AMAC: Gwarinpa, Jikwoyi, Nyanya, Karu and Kabusa. The final analytical sample comprised 150 women attending public facilities and 150 attending private facilities. Participants were selected using a multistage sampling approach. Data were collected using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire covering sociodemographic characteristics, malaria prevention and treatment costs, perceived accessibility and perceived affordability. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize participant characteristics and outcomes. Chi-square tests assessed associations between sociodemographic characteristics and perceived cost/accessibility, while independent-samples t-tests compared mean costs and perception scores between public and private facilities. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results - The majority of respondents were aged 25–34 years (58.3%), married (85.0%), and had at least secondary education (83.3%). Women attending private facilities were more likely to have tertiary education and higher household income, whereas lower-income respondents were disproportionately represented in public facilities. The mean reported cost of malaria prevention was ₦2,450 (SD ₦850) in public facilities compared with ₦4,600 (SD ₦1,100) in private facilities, representing an absolute difference of ₦2,150 (t=-18.72, p<0.001). Similarly, mean malaria treatment cost was ₦4,850 (SD ₦1,450) in public facilities and ₦8,100 (SD ₦1,750) in private facilities, a difference of ₦3,250 (t=-17.35, p<0.001). Perceived accessibility was significantly higher among public-facility attendees (mean 3.28, SD 0.72) than private-facility attendees (mean 2.82, SD 0.64; t=5.87, p<0.001). Perceived affordability was also significantly higher in public facilities (mean 3.76, SD 0.81) than private facilities (mean 2.88, SD 0.84; t=9.24, p<0.001). Educational attainment, occupation, household income and ward of residence were significantly associated with perceived prevention and treatment costs and accessibility.

Conclusion - Malaria prevention and treatment among pregnant women in AMAC impose substantially higher reported financial costs in private healthcare facilities than in public facilities. Socioeconomic position and geographical location were important determinants of perceived cost and accessibility. Strengthening public-sector malaria financing, expanding financial-risk protection, improving commodity availability and establishing effective public–private malaria service arrangements could reduce financial barriers and promote more equitable access to malaria services during pregnancy.},
      keywords = {Malaria; pregnancy; cost analysis; health economics; antenatal care; affordability; accessibility; out-of-pocket expenditure; public health facilities; private health facilities; Nigeria; Abuja.},
      month = {October},
  }