International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723749

1723749 Vol 10 · Issue 4 Download Paper

Financial Risk Assessment and Mitigation in Saudi Debt Markets: A Governance-Based Framework for Vision 2030

Wesam Talal Rasheed Abdel Qani

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Financial Risk

DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I4-1723749

Abstract

The investment program outlined in Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 is expanding the strategic role of sovereign and corporate debt while increasing the importance of disciplined financial-risk governance. This review brings together evidence that has been published between 2020 and 2025 regarding financial risk in Saudi local-currency bonds, sukuk, corporate financing, market liquidity, and governance. It presents a governance-based framework in which risk is not seen as a series of separate exposures but as a transmission system connecting interest-rate repricing, refinancing, credit quality, secondary-market liquidity, external funding, concentration, sukuk structure, and the quality of disclosure. A structured integrative review was conducted using 30 peer-reviewed and authoritative institutional sources published between 2020 and 2025, with source identification and screening procedures informed by PRISMA principles. The synthesis reveals that resilience in the Saudi debt market relies on three conditions: credible governance at the issuer level, a liquid market infrastructure supported by a diversified group of investors, and coordinated oversight by sovereign and regulatory bodies. The review’s principal contribution is a governance-based framework that allocates risk ownership among boards, treasury functions, market intermediaries, regulators, and debt-management authorities; links leading indicators to escalation thresholds and corresponding actions; and integrates stress testing with disclosure, maturity management, liquidity safeguards, and Shari’ah governance. By doing so, the framework supports Vision 2030 in ensuring the continuity of financing without impeding productive leverage, while also identifying key research areas relating to issuer-level data, liquidity microstructure, and the resolution of sukuk distress.

References

[1] Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions (AAOIFI). (2024). Governance Standard (GS) 1 (Revised 2024): Shari'ah Governance Framework. Manama: AAOIFI. AAOIFI

[2] Al-Dubai, S. A. A. (2023). Do level, field, and place of board members' education impact financial risk disclosure? A Saudi empirical evidence. Heliyon, 9(12), e22288. ScienceDirect

[3] Almulhim, A. A., Aljughaiman, A. A., Al Naim, A. S., & Alosaimi, A. K. (2024). Effects of risk committee on agency costs and financial performance. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(8), 328. MDPI

[4] Al-Sahali, S. A., & Al-Adeem, K. R. (2024). Reporting corporate risk: An empirical inquiry into listed entities in the Saudi capital market. Sustainability, 16(15), 6619. MDPI

[5] Bazhair, A. H. (2023). Board governance mechanisms and capital structure of Saudi non-financial listed firms: A dynamic panel analysis. SAGE Open, 13(2). SAGE

[6] Boukhatem, J. (2021). What drives local currency bond market development in Saudi Arabia: Do macroeconomic and institutional factors matter? Future Business Journal, 7, 65. Springer

[7] Boukhatem, J. (2022). How does financial risk affect sukuk market development? Empirical evidence from ARDL approach. Heliyon, 8(5), e09453. ScienceDirect

[8] Boukhatem, J. (2024). The effects of financial risk components on local-currency bond markets: Theory and empirical evidence. SN Business & Economics, 4(4), 41. Springer

[9] Capital Market Authority (CMA). (2024a). Strategic Plan 2024-2026. Riyadh: Capital Market Authority. Capital Market Authority

[10] Capital Market Authority (CMA). (2024b). The Saudi Capital Market Continues to Set Annual Records in 2023. Riyadh: Capital Market Authority. Capital Market Authority

[11] Drehmann, M., Maronoti, B., & O'Connor, A. (2023). Global tightening, banking stress and market resilience in EMEs. BIS Papers No. 134. Basel: Bank for International Settlements. BIS

[12] Financial Sector Development Program (FSDP). (2023). Annual Report 2023. Riyadh: Saudi Vision 2030. Saudi Vision 2030

[13] International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2024). Saudi Arabia: 2024 Article IV Consultation - Press Release; and Staff Report. IMF Country Report No. 24/280. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. IMF

[14] International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2025). Saudi Arabia: 2025 Article IV Consultation - Press Release; and Staff Report. IMF Country Report No. 25/223. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. IMF

[15] Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB). (2024). Islamic Financial Services Industry Stability Report 2024. Kuala Lumpur: IFSB. IFSB

[16] Kalimullina, M., & Hassan, M. K. (2022). Default risk as a factor preventing companies from entering the sukuk market. Risk Management, 24(4), 298-326. Springer

[17] Li, X., Rehman, A. U., Toma, S., Jaradat, M., Lv, X., Mihai, D. M., Spinu, A. E., & Shabbir, M. S. (2024). Does corporate social sustainability influence on business environment? Impact of corporate governance on distance to default of sukuk issuers in Islamic banks. International Review of Economics & Finance, 93, 520-528. ScienceDirect

[18] Mohd Saad, N., Haniff, M. N., & Ali, N. (2020). Corporate governance mechanisms with conventional bonds and sukuk’ yield spreads. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 62, 101116. ScienceDirect

[19] Naifar, N., Tiwari, A. K., & Alhashim, M. (2022). How COVID-19 pandemic, global risk factors, and oil prices affect Islamic bonds (Sukuk) prices? New insights from time-frequency analysis. Review of Financial Economics, 40(3), 312-331. Wiley

[20] National Debt Management Center (NDMC). (2024). The National Debt Management Center Annual Report for the fiscal year 1445-1446 AH (2024). Riyadh: National Debt Management Center. National Debt Management Center

[21] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2025). OECD Corporate Governance Factbook 2025: Saudi Arabia. Paris: OECD Publishing. OECD

[22] Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. BMJ

[23] Saeed, M., Elnahass, M., Izzeldin, M., & Tsionas, M. (2021). Yield spread determinants of sukuk and conventional bonds. Economic Modelling, 105, 105664. ScienceDirect

[24] Saudi Central Bank (SAMA). (2024). Financial Stability Report 2024. Riyadh: Saudi Central Bank. Saudi Central Bank

[25] Saudi Exchange. (2024). Capital Market Overview Report Q4 2024. Riyadh: Saudi Exchange. Saudi Exchange

[26] Swandaru, R., & Muneeza, A. (2024). Causes for near default sukuk cases in the 21st century and their rescue mechanisms. Jihbiz: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan dan Perbankan Syariah, 8(1), 1-13. Jihbiz

[27] Uddin, M. H., Kabir, S. H., Hassan, M. K., Hossain, M. S., & Liu, J. (2022). Why do sukuks (Islamic bonds) need a different pricing model? International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(2), 2210-2234. Wiley

[28] Ur Rehman, A., Farid, S., & Naeem, M. A. (2023). The link between corporate governance, corporate social sustainability and credit risk of Islamic bonds. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(12), 5990-6014. Emerald

[29] Van Doornik, B. F. N., Frost, J., Guerra, R., Tombini, A., & Upper, C. (2024). Towards liquid and resilient government debt markets in EMEs. BIS Quarterly Review, March 2024. Basel: Bank for International Settlements. BIS

[30] Zaheer, S., & van Wijnbergen, S. (2025). Sukuk defaults: On distress resolution in Islamic finance. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 17(2), 292-311.

How to cite this paper

Wesam Talal Rasheed Abdel Qani "Financial Risk Assessment and Mitigation in Saudi Debt Markets: A Governance-Based Framework for Vision 2030" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 4 2026 Page 548-562 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1723749
Wesam Talal Rasheed Abdel Qani "Financial Risk Assessment and Mitigation in Saudi Debt Markets: A Governance-Based Framework for Vision 2030" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1723749
Wesam Talal Rasheed Abdel Qani (2026). Financial Risk Assessment and Mitigation in Saudi Debt Markets: A Governance-Based Framework for Vision 2030. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1723749
Wesam Talal Rasheed Abdel Qani "Financial Risk Assessment and Mitigation in Saudi Debt Markets: A Governance-Based Framework for Vision 2030" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1723749
@article{1723749,
      author = {Wesam Talal Rasheed Abdel Qani},
      title = {Financial Risk Assessment and Mitigation in Saudi Debt Markets: A Governance-Based Framework for Vision 2030},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {4},
      pages = {548-562},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723749.pdf},
      abstract = {The investment program outlined in Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 is expanding the strategic role of sovereign and corporate debt while increasing the importance of disciplined financial-risk governance. This review brings together evidence that has been published between 2020 and 2025 regarding financial risk in Saudi local-currency bonds, sukuk, corporate financing, market liquidity, and governance. It presents a governance-based framework in which risk is not seen as a series of separate exposures but as a transmission system connecting interest-rate repricing, refinancing, credit quality, secondary-market liquidity, external funding, concentration, sukuk structure, and the quality of disclosure. A structured integrative review was conducted using 30 peer-reviewed and authoritative institutional sources published between 2020 and 2025, with source identification and screening procedures informed by PRISMA principles. The synthesis reveals that resilience in the Saudi debt market relies on three conditions: credible governance at the issuer level, a liquid market infrastructure supported by a diversified group of investors, and coordinated oversight by sovereign and regulatory bodies. The review’s principal contribution is a governance-based framework that allocates risk ownership among boards, treasury functions, market intermediaries, regulators, and debt-management authorities; links leading indicators to escalation thresholds and corresponding actions; and integrates stress testing with disclosure, maturity management, liquidity safeguards, and Shari’ah governance. By doing so, the framework supports Vision 2030 in ensuring the continuity of financing without impeding productive leverage, while also identifying key research areas relating to issuer-level data, liquidity microstructure, and the resolution of sukuk distress.},
      month = {October},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1723749}
  }