Developing a Risk-Based Environmental Management Framework for Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects in Saudi Arabia

References

[1] Abdelhady, M.A.E. (2024). Policies and legislation enabling sustainable technologies in the public transport infrastructure in NEOM. Sustainable Development, 32(5), 5602–5610. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2976

[2] Adshead, D., Paszkowski, A., Gall, S.S., Peard, A.M., Adnan, M.S.G., Verschuur, J., et al. (2024). Climate threats to coastal infrastructure and sustainable development outcomes. Nature Climate Change. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-01950-2

[3] Alazmi, S., Abdelmegid, M., Sarhan, S., Poshdar, M., Gonzalez, V., & Bidhendi, A. (2025). An integrated framework to improve waste management practices and environmental awareness in the Saudi construction industry. Cleaner Waste Systems, 10, 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2024.100195

[4] Aljarallah, N., Alsugair, A.M., Almohsen, A., & Al-Gahtani, K.S. (2024). Identifying the significant causes of waste of housing infrastructure projects in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 86, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.11.063

[5] Alotaibi, S., Martinez-Vazquez, P., & Baniotopoulos, C. (2024). Mega-Projects in Construction: Barriers in the Implementation of Circular Economy Concepts in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Buildings, 14(5), 1298. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051298

[6] Amarasinghe, I., Hong, Y., & Stewart, R.A. (2024). Development of a material circularity evaluation framework for building construction projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 436, 140562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140562

[7] Baslom, A., Magsood, T., Shooshtarian, S., & Trigunarsyah, B. (2026). Enhancing the circular economy in Saudi Arabia’s construction sector: a source segregation perspective through thematic analysis. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-07-2025-0432

[8] Bellini, A., Andersen, B., Klungseth, N.J., & Tadayon, A. (2024). Achieving a circular economy through the effective reuse of construction products: A case study of a residential building. Journal of Cleaner Production, 450, 141753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141753

[9] Coskun, C., Dikmen, I., & Birgonul, M.T. (2023). Sustainability risk assessment in mega construction projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 13(5), 700–718. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-10-2022-0153

[10] Ebrahim, M.A.-B. (2025). Application of Integrated Surveying Technologies for Risk Management in Megaprojects: Case Study of NEOM’s Oxagon Port, Saudi Arabia. Journal of Surveying Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSUED2.SUENG-1679

[11] Huang, J., Abadi, M., & Yeow, J. (2025). Policy framework for facilitating reverse logistics in circular construction: an integrated Fuzzy-DEMATEL and system dynamics approach. Waste Management, 204, 114963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114963

[12] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines. Geneva: ISO.

[13] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2026). ISO 14001:2026 Environmental management systems — Requirements with guidance for use. Geneva: ISO.

[14] National Center for Environmental Compliance (NCEC). (2026). Environmental permitting and licensing services and requirements. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

[15] Riera, J.A., Lima, R.M., Ezekiel, J., Mai, P.M., Knio, O., et al. (2024). Addressing extreme weather events for the renewable power-water-heating sectors in Neom, Saudi Arabia. Communications Earth & Environment, 5, 614.

[16] Salah, M., Elmasry, M., Mashhour, I.M., & Amer, N. (2023). A framework for assessing sustainability of construction projects. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 13, 100626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2023.100626

[17] Saudi Green Initiative. (2024). Saudi Green Initiative: A new era of action — factsheet. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

[18] Saudi Vision 2030. (2026). Vision 2030 Annual Report 2025. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

[19] Swarnakar, V., & Khalfan, M. (2024). Circular economy in construction and demolition waste management: an in-depth review and future perspectives in the construction sector. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-02-2024-0056

[20] Waqar, A., Nisar, S., Muddassir, M., & Benjeddou, O. (2025). An integrated management system (IMS) approach to sustainable construction development and management. Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience, 4(1), 100126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iintel.2024.100126

[21] Wuni, I.Y. (2025). Developing a multidimensional risk assessment model for sustainable construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(6), 4155–4173. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2023-1201

[22] Yuan, H., Ma, X., & Xia, B. (2024). Mega infrastructure project affordance: A new perspective to improve stakeholder management and project sustainability. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 11, 766–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-024-4063-1

@article{1723754,
      author = {Fazal Ahmed Khan},
      title = {Developing a Risk-Based Environmental Management Framework for Large-Scale Infrastructure Projects in Saudi Arabia},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {4},
      pages = {755-769},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723754.pdf},
      abstract = {Saudi Arabia’s infrastructure transformation under Vision 2030 is creating an exceptional need for environmental management systems that can operate at the scale, speed, complexity and ecological sensitivity of giga- and mega-project delivery. Conventional environmental management plans often catalogue impacts and controls but do not always provide a transparent method for prioritising uncertain, cumulative and high-consequence environmental risks across the project life cycle. This paper develops a risk-based environmental management framework for large-scale infrastructure projects in Saudi Arabia. The study adopts a conceptual and structured narrative synthesis of contemporary construction-sustainability literature, international risk and environmental management standards, and Saudi regulatory and policy requirements. The proposed framework integrates ISO 31000 risk principles with the lifecycle and continual-improvement logic of ISO 14001:2026, while reflecting National Center for Environmental Compliance permitting and monitoring expectations. It introduces a six-factor adjusted environmental risk score combining likelihood, consequence, exposure, legal significance, ecological reversibility and control effectiveness. The framework is organised into eight connected stages: context and compliance definition; risk identification; analysis; evaluation; treatment planning; control execution; monitoring and assurance; and adaptive review. A practical risk taxonomy, scoring criteria, governance structure, key performance indicators and an illustrative risk register are presented. The framework is designed to strengthen traceability from environmental impact assessment through design, construction, commissioning, operation and closure, enabling project teams to concentrate resources on material environmental risks rather than treating all aspects equally. The paper contributes a Saudi-contextualised decision-support approach that links regulatory compliance, project risk governance and environmental performance. Empirical validation through expert elicitation and application to active infrastructure projects is recommended as the next research stage.},
      keywords = {Saudi Vision 2030; environmental risk management; infrastructure projects; environmental impact assessment; ISO 14001; ISO 31000; NCEC; sustainability; megaprojects; adaptive management},
      month = {October},
  }