Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723783
An Artificial Intelligence Based Predictive Safety Management Framework for High Risk Industries in Saudi Arabia
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Artificial Intelligence
Abstract
High-risk industries in Saudi Arabia are expanding while major construction, mining, energy, logistics and industrial programmes increase the scale and complexity of occupational risk. Conventional safety management remains essential, yet lagging indicators, periodic inspections and rule-based controls often identify deterioration only after exposure has accumulated. This structured review develops an artificial intelligence-based predictive safety management framework suited to Saudi operating conditions. It integrates leading indicators from permits, inspections, sensors, equipment systems, workforce records, environmental monitoring and incident narratives; applies transparent risk models; and routes predictions through human review and proportionate controls. The synthesis shows that artificial intelligence can improve prioritisation, early-warning capability and learning across dispersed sites, but only when data quality, privacy, workforce participation, model drift, cybersecurity and accountability are governed explicitly. The proposed framework therefore treats artificial intelligence as a decision-support layer within an ISO 45001-aligned management system, not as an autonomous replacement for competent safety judgement. Its principal contribution is a risk-based operating model linking data governance, prediction, verification, intervention and continuous assurance to Saudi Vision 2030 objectives.
Keywords
artificial intelligence; predictive safety; occupational health and safety; high-risk industries; Saudi Arabia; risk governance; leading indicators; Industry 4.0
References
[1] International Labour Organization. (2022). A safe and healthy working environment is a fundamental principle and right at work. ILO.
[2] International Labour Organization. (2025). Revolutionizing health and safety: The role of AI and digitalization at work. ILO.
[3] International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 45001:2018 Occupational health and safety management systems - Requirements with guidance for use.
[4] Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2016). Saudi Vision 2030.
[5] World Health Organization & International Labour Organization. (2021). WHO/ILO joint estimates of the work-related burden of disease and injury, 2000-2016. WHO.
[6] National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). NIST AI 100-1.
[7] International Organization for Standardization. (2023). ISO/IEC 23894:2023 Information technology - Artificial intelligence - Guidance on risk management.
[8] OECD. (2019). Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence. OECD/LEGAL/0449.
[9] Tixier, A. J. P., Hallowell, M. R., Rajagopalan, B., & Bowman, D. (2016). Application of machine learning to construction injury prediction. Automation in Construction, 69, 102-114.
[10] Baker, H., Hallowell, M. R., & Tixier, A. J. P. (2020). AI-based prediction of independent construction safety outcomes from universal attributes. Automation in Construction, 118, 103146.
[11] Fang, Q., Li, H., Luo, X., Ding, L., Luo, H., Rose, T. M., & An, W. (2018). Detecting non-hardhat-use by a deep learning method from far-field surveillance videos. Automation in Construction, 85, 1-9.
[12] Nath, N. D., Behzadan, A. H., & Paal, S. G. (2020). Deep learning for site safety: Real-time detection of personal protective equipment. Automation in Construction, 112, 103085.
[13] Abioye, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Akanbi, L., Ajayi, A., Delgado, J. M. D., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., & Ahmed, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: A review. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, 103299.
[14] Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). Roles of artificial intelligence in construction engineering and management: A critical review and future trends. Automation in Construction, 122, 103517.
[15] Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Adabre, M. A., Edwards, D. J., Hosseini, M. R., & Ameyaw, E. E. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the AEC industry: Scientometric analysis and visualization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 271, 122825.
[16] Martinez, P., Al-Hussein, M., & Ahmad, R. (2020). A scientometric analysis and critical review of computer vision applications for construction. Automation in Construction, 107, 102947.
[17] Newaz, M. T., Davis, P., Jefferies, M., & Pillay, M. (2022). Developing a safety climate factor model in construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 29(1), 401-420.
[18] Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Why should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of KDD, 1135-1144.
[19] Arrieta, A. B., Diaz-Rodriguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., et al. (2020). Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges. Information Fusion, 58, 82-115.
[20] Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6), 1-35.
[21] Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2021). Personal Data Protection Law, Royal Decree No. M/19.
[22] Saudi Data and Artificial Intelligence Authority. (2020). National Strategy for Data and AI.
[23] European Union Agency for Cybersecurity. (2023). Cybersecurity of AI and standardisation.
[24] International Organization for Standardization. (2022). ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information security management systems - Requirements.
[25] European Parliament and Council. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence.
How to cite this paper
@article{1723783,
author = {Abdul Rauf},
title = {An Artificial Intelligence Based Predictive Safety Management Framework for High Risk Industries in Saudi Arabia},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {789-799},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723783.pdf},
abstract = {High-risk industries in Saudi Arabia are expanding while major construction, mining, energy, logistics and industrial programmes increase the scale and complexity of occupational risk. Conventional safety management remains essential, yet lagging indicators, periodic inspections and rule-based controls often identify deterioration only after exposure has accumulated. This structured review develops an artificial intelligence-based predictive safety management framework suited to Saudi operating conditions. It integrates leading indicators from permits, inspections, sensors, equipment systems, workforce records, environmental monitoring and incident narratives; applies transparent risk models; and routes predictions through human review and proportionate controls. The synthesis shows that artificial intelligence can improve prioritisation, early-warning capability and learning across dispersed sites, but only when data quality, privacy, workforce participation, model drift, cybersecurity and accountability are governed explicitly. The proposed framework therefore treats artificial intelligence as a decision-support layer within an ISO 45001-aligned management system, not as an autonomous replacement for competent safety judgement. Its principal contribution is a risk-based operating model linking data governance, prediction, verification, intervention and continuous assurance to Saudi Vision 2030 objectives.},
keywords = {artificial intelligence; predictive safety; occupational health and safety; high-risk industries; Saudi Arabia; risk governance; leading indicators; Industry 4.0},
month = {October},
}