Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723790
Assessment of The Cost Delivery Methods Adopted by Privately Developed Construction Projects in Abuja, Nigeria
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Construction Industry
Abstract
The construction industry in Nigeria continues to experience persistent challenges associated with cost overruns, inaccurate cost forecasting, inadequate cost control, scope changes, design deficiencies, inflation, procurement inefficiencies, material price fluctuations, and ineffective coordination among project stakeholders. These challenges are particularly significant in privately developed construction projects, where developers are increasingly required to achieve predetermined project objectives within constrained financial resources while maintaining the required level of quality, functionality, sustainability, and performance. Despite the availability of conventional cost management practices, effective mechanisms for integrating value-based decision-making into the cost delivery process remain inadequate. Value Engineering (VE), which focuses on achieving the required functions of a project at the optimum overall cost without compromising essential performance, provides a potential approach for addressing these challenges. This study therefore aims to assess the cost delivery methods adopted by privately developed construction projects in Abuja, Nigeria. Using information obtained from relevant literature reviews which are acquired from textbooks, journals, conferences and online publication. The findings revealed that Lump Sum (Fixed Price) was the very frequently used cost delivery method adopted by private developed construction projects. It was also found that life cycle cost analysis is a very important value engineering techniques for delivery of privately developed construction projects. The study concludes that stated that the Lump Sum (Fixed Price) method remains the most widely adopted cost delivery method because it provides clients with certainty regarding the total project cost before construction commences. The research recommends that cost delivery should be implemented as a continuous management process throughout the entire project lifecycle rather than being introduced only during the design stage so as to serves as a decision-support tool for construction professionals, private developers, consultants, contractors, and policymakers seeking to institutionalize Value Engineering practices and improve the cost delivery performance of privately developed construction projects.
Keywords
Cost Delivery, Private Developed, Construction Projects, Value Engineering, Abuja, Nigeria.
References
[1] Adebayo, A. A. (2019). Assessment of procurement methods in Nigerian private construction projects. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 24(2), 45–62.
[2] Alzizeiqi, H. O., Umar, U. M., & Badr, R. H. (2020). Causes of cost overruns in construction projects: A review. Journal of Engineering, Management & Innovation, 3(2), 55-68.
[3] Banwo, O. O. (2022). Development of a framework for building cost information management in Nigeria (PhD thesis). Coventry University. Coventry University
[4] Bioku, O. J., & Ataguba, J. O. (2022). The deployment of value workshop objectives to evaluate value engineering awareness and proficiency among construction and allied professionals. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 12(1).
[5] Dell’Isola, A. J. (2019). Value engineering: Practical applications for design, construction, maintenance and operations. RSMeans.
[6] Ebekozien, A., Aigbavboa, C. O., Aigbedion, M., Ogbaini, I. F., & Aginah, I. L. (2023). Integrated project delivery in the Nigerian construction sector: An unexplored approach from the stakeholders' perspective. Construction Management and Quantity Surveying.
[7] Khan, A. M. (2025). Optimizing sustainable alternatives in value engineering: A BIM-based plugin for cost, energy and carbon assessment. (Journal article describing BIM plugin integration for VE).
[8] Ibrahim, A. D., & Ajayi, O. M. (2021). Cost overrun factors in Abuja building projects. Nigerian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 15(1), 33–47.
[9] Love, P. E. D., Sing, C. P., Wang, X., & Edwards, D. J. (2017). Determining the probability of cost overruns in Australian construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(3), 04015061.
[10] Oke, A. E., & Ogunsemi, D. R. (2019). Procurement methods and project performance in Nigeria. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(3), 398–412.
[11] Ugwu, K. (2023). Aligning Total Quality Management, Continuous Improvement for Process Performance: An Empirical Review. Journal of Advance Research in Business, Management and Accounting, 1(1), 12-25.
[12] Unegbu, K., Ikechukwu, N., & Okafor, J. I. (2023). Delivery strategies of private building projects amid hyper-inflationary trends in Southwest Nigeria. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 26(1), 1-12.
[13] Olatunde, N. A., Awodele, I. A., & Ramabodu, M. S. (2026). Delivery strategies of private building projects amid hyper-inflationary trends in Southwest Nigeria. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(3), 482–495. Taylor & Francis
[14] Olatunji, O. A., Sher, W., & Gu, N. (2010). Building information modeling and quantity surveying practice. Emirates Journal for Engineering Research, 15(1), 67–70.
[15] Oke, A. E., & Aigbavboa, C. O. (2017). Sustainable value management for construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 196, 1017–1024.
[16] Omoegbe, O. E., Odu, T. Y., & Obianyo, I. I. (2026). Examining procurement methods and practices for private construction projects in Abuja, Nigeria. Construction Technologies and Architecture, 22, 55–65. Trans Tech Publications
[17] Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute. Project Management Institute
[18] Ibrahim, A. D., & Ajayi, O. M. (2021). Cost overrun factors in Abuja building projects. Nigerian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 15(1), 33–47.
[19] Nnadi, E. O., & Najjobyo, J. (2025). Financial and operational effects of cost estimation inaccuracy, material price volatility, and payment delays in Nigerian construction projects. Smart Construction and Sustainable Cities, 3, Article 29. Springer
[20] Usman, F., Jalaluddin, N. A., & Hamim, S. A. (2018). Value engineering in Building Information Modelling for cost optimization of renovation works: A case study. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4.35), 431–435. International Journal of Engineering and Technology
[21] SAVE International. (2024). The Value Methodology. Retrieved October 23, 2025, from SAVE International
How to cite this paper
@article{1723790,
author = {Abba Yahaya Mustapha, Ibrahim Saidu, Funmilola Helen Omoniwa, Jibril Adamu Muhammad},
title = {Assessment of The Cost Delivery Methods Adopted by Privately Developed Construction Projects in Abuja, Nigeria},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {1032-1041},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723790.pdf},
abstract = {The construction industry in Nigeria continues to experience persistent challenges associated with cost overruns, inaccurate cost forecasting, inadequate cost control, scope changes, design deficiencies, inflation, procurement inefficiencies, material price fluctuations, and ineffective coordination among project stakeholders. These challenges are particularly significant in privately developed construction projects, where developers are increasingly required to achieve predetermined project objectives within constrained financial resources while maintaining the required level of quality, functionality, sustainability, and performance. Despite the availability of conventional cost management practices, effective mechanisms for integrating value-based decision-making into the cost delivery process remain inadequate. Value Engineering (VE), which focuses on achieving the required functions of a project at the optimum overall cost without compromising essential performance, provides a potential approach for addressing these challenges. This study therefore aims to assess the cost delivery methods adopted by privately developed construction projects in Abuja, Nigeria. Using information obtained from relevant literature reviews which are acquired from textbooks, journals, conferences and online publication. The findings revealed that Lump Sum (Fixed Price) was the very frequently used cost delivery method adopted by private developed construction projects. It was also found that life cycle cost analysis is a very important value engineering techniques for delivery of privately developed construction projects. The study concludes that stated that the Lump Sum (Fixed Price) method remains the most widely adopted cost delivery method because it provides clients with certainty regarding the total project cost before construction commences. The research recommends that cost delivery should be implemented as a continuous management process throughout the entire project lifecycle rather than being introduced only during the design stage so as to serves as a decision-support tool for construction professionals, private developers, consultants, contractors, and policymakers seeking to institutionalize Value Engineering practices and improve the cost delivery performance of privately developed construction projects.},
keywords = {Cost Delivery, Private Developed, Construction Projects, Value Engineering, Abuja, Nigeria.},
month = {October},
}