Ductility Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beam Sections under Simple Bending According to Strain Domains

References

[1] Mairone M, Maragno G, Masera D, Corrado M. Strength and ductility of hybrid steel and FRP reinforced concrete sections subjected to combined axial and bending regime. Infrastructures. 2026. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11050170

[2] Nogueira CG, Rodrigues I. New design model of reinforced concrete beams in bending considering the ductility factor. Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais. 2020;13:120–141. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-41952020000100009

[3] Foroughi S, Yuksel S. A new approach for determining the curvature ductility of reinforced concrete beams. Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering. 2022;30:8–20. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjce-2022-0002

[4] Tamayo J, García G. Reassessment of the flexural behavior of high-strength reinforced concrete beams under short-term loads. SN Applied Sciences. 2021;3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04190-7

[5] Qiu M-H, Hu Y-Q, Shao X, Zhu Y, Li P, Li X-F. Experimental investigation on flexural and ductile behaviors of rebar-reinforced ultra-high-performance concrete beams. Structural Concrete. 2022;23:1533–1554. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202100794

[6] Renić T, Kišiček T. Ductility of concrete beams reinforced with FRP rebars. Buildings. 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11090424

[7] Yang I-H, Park J, Bui TQ, Kim K-C, Joh C, Lee H. An experimental study on the ductility and flexural toughness of ultrahigh-performance concrete beams subjected to bending. Materials. 2020;13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13102225

[8] Alsomiri M, Liu Z, Wang T, Meng J. Ductility-oriented design of UHPC t-beams: Mechanical model and design recommendations. Structural Concrete. 2024;26:425–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202400214

[9] Shewalul YW. Numerical and FEA investigation of sectional capacity and moment redistribution behavior of steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC) beam. Heliyon. 2021;7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07354

[10] Gómez-Martínez F, Pérez-García A. Yielding and ultimate deformations of wide and deep reinforced concrete beams. Buildings. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12112015

[11] Bellos J, Konstantinidis A. Systematic calculation of yield and failure curvatures of reinforced concrete cross-sections. Buildings. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030826

[12] Belhocine M, Benyahi K, Bouafia Y, Rahmouni O, Messas A. Nonlinear analysis methods for reinforced concrete structural elements subjected to static and dynamic loads. Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences. 2024;14:202–211. https://doi.org/10.2478/jaes-2024-0025

[13] Pham T, Hong W. Investigation of strain evolutions in prestressed reinforced concrete beams based on nonlinear finite element analyses considering concrete plasticity and concrete damaged plasticity. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2021;21:448–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2020.1869014

[14] Thamrin R, Zaidir Z, Iwanda D. Ductility estimation for flexural concrete beams longitudinally reinforced with hybrid FRP–Steel bars. Polymers. 2022;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14051017

[15] Ali NM. Finite element analysis of flexural behavior in ultra-high-strength concrete beams with BFRP and hybrid BFRP-steel reinforcement. Scientific Reports. 2025;16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-32867-1

@article{1723800,
      author = {Fabio Henrique Ferreira},
      title = {Ductility Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beam Sections under Simple Bending According to Strain Domains},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {4},
      pages = {1371-1376},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723800.pdf},
      abstract = {Ductility is a central requirement in the flexural design of reinforced concrete beams because it governs the capacity of a section to sustain inelastic deformation before loss of resistance. This narrative review examines the relationship between neutral-axis depth, strain compatibility, reinforcement condition, and curvature ductility in reinforced concrete sections subjected to simple bending. The literature indicates that under-reinforced sections, in which tensile reinforcement yields before concrete crushing, generally provide a more ductile response than over-reinforced sections. As the neutral axis becomes deeper and the compression zone becomes more dominant, the available deformation capacity tends to decrease and failure becomes more brittle. Compression reinforcement, confinement, fiber-reinforced cementitious materials, and hybrid steel–FRP reinforcement can modify this response, although the conventional yield-based definition of ductility requires caution when non-yielding FRP reinforcement is used. The review also highlights that neutral-axis depth is a useful design indicator but should not be treated as an isolated or universal measure of ductility, because material properties, reinforcement ratios, confinement, geometry, and the adopted definition of ultimate curvature also affect sectional behavior. The findings support a strain-compatible, mechanism-based interpretation of ductility rather than reliance on reinforcement strength alone.},
      keywords = {reinforced concrete; flexural ductility; neutral axis; strain domains; curvature ductility; beam sections},
      month = {October},
  }