Home / Current Issue / Paper 1724040
The Shift from Google Search to ChatGPT: How Generative AI Is Changing Students’ Information-Seeking Behaviour
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Gen
Abstract
The rapid spread of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT is changing how students search for, understand, and verify academic information, a role long held by search engines such as Google. This study examines students’ self-reported information-seeking behaviour with Google Search and ChatGPT, covering frequency of use, purpose, first-source preference, reasons for adoption, trust, verification practice, and perceived change. A descriptive, quantitative survey was conducted using a 25-item structured Google Forms questionnaire administered to college and university students through convenience sampling (N = 200). Data were analysed using frequency and percentage analysis. Of the respondents, 73.5% use ChatGPT/AI at least once a day, and 61.2% name ChatGPT/AI as their first source for academic answers, compared with 30.6% for Google Search. Understanding concepts, faster answers, and easier explanations were the main reasons for use. Trust was conditional: 59.2% verify ChatGPT answers always or often, 59.2% have encountered incorrect or misleading output at least sometimes, and Google Search was the most common verification source (42.9%). In total, 93.9% reported at least some change in how they find information. The findings point to a hybrid, AI-assisted pattern rather than a replacement of search engines; however, they rest on self-reported data from a non-probability sample and cannot be generalised.
Keywords
generative AI; ChatGPT; Google Search; information-seeking behaviour; students; verification
References
[1] Rowlands I, Nicholas D, Williams P, Huntington P, Fieldhouse M, Gunter B, et al. The Google generation: The information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings. 2008;60(4):290–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530810887953
[2] OpenAI. Introducing ChatGPT. OpenAI; 30 November 2022. https://openai.com/index/chatgpt/ (accessed 13 October 2026).
[3] Dwivedi YK, Kshetri N, Hughes L, Slade EL, Jeyaraj A, Kar AK, et al. Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management. 2023;71:102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
[4] Kasneci E, Sessler K, Küchemann S, Bannert M, Dementieva D, Fischer F, et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences. 2023;103:102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
[5] Ji Z, Lee N, Frieske R, Yu T, Su D, Xu Y, et al. Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys. 2023;55(12):1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730
[6] Shah C, Bender EM. Situating search. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ’22); 2022. p. 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/3498366.3505816
[7] Miao F, Holmes W. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Paris: UNESCO; 2023. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
[8] Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2018.
How to cite this paper
@article{1724040,
author = {Vishwas Kenchi, Vishwas Kenchi, Rutuja More , Sarika Kore, Jay Shinde},
title = {The Shift from Google Search to ChatGPT: How Generative AI Is Changing Students’ Information-Seeking Behaviour},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {2562-2570},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724040.pdf},
abstract = {The rapid spread of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT is changing how students search for, understand, and verify academic information, a role long held by search engines such as Google. This study examines students’ self-reported information-seeking behaviour with Google Search and ChatGPT, covering frequency of use, purpose, first-source preference, reasons for adoption, trust, verification practice, and perceived change. A descriptive, quantitative survey was conducted using a 25-item structured Google Forms questionnaire administered to college and university students through convenience sampling (N = 200). Data were analysed using frequency and percentage analysis. Of the respondents, 73.5% use ChatGPT/AI at least once a day, and 61.2% name ChatGPT/AI as their first source for academic answers, compared with 30.6% for Google Search. Understanding concepts, faster answers, and easier explanations were the main reasons for use. Trust was conditional: 59.2% verify ChatGPT answers always or often, 59.2% have encountered incorrect or misleading output at least sometimes, and Google Search was the most common verification source (42.9%). In total, 93.9% reported at least some change in how they find information. The findings point to a hybrid, AI-assisted pattern rather than a replacement of search engines; however, they rest on self-reported data from a non-probability sample and cannot be generalised.},
keywords = {generative AI; ChatGPT; Google Search; information-seeking behaviour; students; verification},
month = {October},
}