Home / Current Issue / Paper 1724050
Design, Synthesis, QSAR and Molecular Docking of Substituted Chalcones as Selective COX-2 Inhibitors: A Review
Subject area: Biological & Medical Sciences · Area of research: Pharmacy
Abstract
Selective inhibition of the inducible cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) isoform, while sparing constitutive, gastroprotective COX-1, remains a central strategy for developing safer anti-inflammatory agents, and the chalcone scaffold, a chemically simple 1,3-diarylprop-2-en-1-one, has repeatedly proven amenable to the substituent patterning this selectivity requires. This review synthesises the rational design, synthesis and evaluation strategy proposed for a focused series of eight substituted chalcones (CH-1 to CH-8) built around a constant 4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl ring-A, the same sulfone-based pharmacophore established in celecoxib, fused through an enone linker to a ring-B bearing eight substituents spanning a wide Hammett sigma range from strongly electron-donating (4-N(CH3)2, sigma -0.83) to strongly electron-withdrawing (4-NO2, sigma +0.78). The structural basis for COX-2 selectivity, centred on the Val523-for-Ile523 substitution that opens a second hydrophobic side pocket in COX-2 but not COX-1, is discussed alongside the base-catalysed Claisen-Schmidt condensation route proposed for the series, the full spectroscopic and chromatographic characterisation strategy, RDKit-computed physicochemical and Lipinski-rule profiling, AutoDock Vina-based molecular docking against the COX-2 crystal structure, in-vitro COX-1/COX-2 inhibition and selectivity-index determination, and a Hansch-type quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) framework relating log(1/IC50) to Hammett sigma, calculated lipophilicity and topological polar surface area. Precedent from recent chalcone-COX-2 and chalcone-QSAR literature is drawn together to situate the proposed series, and in particular its combination of systematic electronic variation, parallel dual-isoform in-vitro screening, docking validation and Hansch-type QSAR modelling within a single internally consistent study, against the wider body of chalcone-based cyclooxygenase inhibitor design.
Keywords
chalcones; cyclooxygenase-2; selective COX-2 inhibitors; Claisen-Schmidt condensation; Hammett sigma; molecular docking; Hansch QSAR; celecoxib
References
[1] Vane JR. Inhibition of Prostaglandin Synthesis as a Mechanism of Action for Aspirin-like Drugs. Nature New Biology. 1971;231(25):232–235.
[2] Xie WL, Chipman JG, Robertson DL, Erikson RL, Simmons DL. Expression of a mitogen-responsive gene encoding prostaglandin synthase is regulated by mRNA splicing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88(7):2692–2696.
[3] Simmons DL, Botting RM, Hla T. Cyclooxygenase Isozymes: The Biology of Prostaglandin Synthesis and Inhibition. Pharmacol Rev. 2004;56(3):387–437.
[4] Kurumbail RG, Stevens AM, Gierse JK, McDonald JJ, Stegeman RA, Pak JY, Gildehaus D, Iyashiro JM, Penning TD, Seibert K, Isakson PC, Stallings WC. Structural basis for selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by anti-inflammatory agents. Nature. 1996;384(6610):644–648.
[5] Rouzer CA, Marnett LJ. Structural and Chemical Biology of the Interaction of Cyclooxygenase with Substrates and Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. Chem Rev. 2020;120(15):7592–7641.
[6] FitzGerald GA, Patrono C. The Coxibs, Selective Inhibitors of Cyclooxygenase-2. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(6):433–442.
[7] Marnett LJ. The COXIB Experience: A Look in the Rearview Mirror. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2009;49:265–290.
[8] Dannhardt G, Kiefer W. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors--current status and future prospects. Eur J Med Chem. 2001;36(2):109–126.
[9] Penning TD, Talley JJ, Bertenshaw SR, Carter JS, Collins PW, Docter S, Graneto MJ, Lee LF, Malecha JW, Miyashiro JM, Rogers RS, Rogier DJ, Yu SS, Anderson GD, Burton EG, Cogburn JN, Gregory SA, Koboldt CM, Perkins WE, Seibert K, Veenhuizen AW. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of the 1,5-Diarylpyrazole Class of Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Identification of 4-[5-(4-Methylphenyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]benzenesulfonamide (SC-58635, Celecoxib). J Med Chem. 1997;40(9):1347–1365.
[10] Talley JJ, Brown DL, Carter JS, Graneto MJ, Koboldt CM, Masferrer JL, Perkins WE, Rogers RS, Shaffer AF, Zhang YY, Zweifel BS, Seibert K. 4-[5-Methyl-3-phenylisoxazol-4-yl]-benzenesulfonamide, valdecoxib: a potent and selective inhibitor of COX-2. J Med Chem. 2000;43(5):775–777.
[11] Zhuang C, Zhang W, Sheng C, Zhang W, Xing C, Miao Z. Chalcone: A Privileged Structure in Medicinal Chemistry. Chem Rev. 2017;117(12):7762–7810.
[12] Elkanzi NAA, Hrichi H, Alolayan RA, Derafa W, Zahou FM, Bakr RB. Synthesis of Chalcones Derivatives and Their Biological Activities: A Review. ACS Omega. 2022;7(32):27769–27786.
[13] Zhou B. Diverse Molecular Targets for Chalcones with Varied Bioactivities. Med Chem. 2015;5(8).
[14] Herencia F, Ferrándiz ML, Ubeda A, Guillén I, Dominguez JN, Charris JE, Lobo GM, Alcaraz MJ. Novel anti-inflammatory chalcone derivatives inhibit the induction of nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 in mouse peritoneal macrophages. FEBS Lett. 1999;453(1–2):129–134.
[15] Wu J, Li J, Cai Y, Pan Y, Ye F, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Yang S, Li X, Liang G. Evaluation and Discovery of Novel Synthetic Chalcone Derivatives as Anti-Inflammatory Agents. J Med Chem. 2011;54(23):8110–8123.
[16] Kaya Çavuşoğlu B, Sağlık BN, Acar Çevik U, Osmaniye D, Levent S, Özkay Y, Kaplancıklı ZA. Design, synthesis, biological evaluation, and docking studies of some novel chalcones as selective COX-2 inhibitors. Arch Pharm (Weinheim). 2021;354(3):e2000273.
[17] Abd El-Hameed AM, Lotfallah AH, Nemr MTM, Abdelhady HK, Haredy HH, Sayed AM, Mohamed MFA, Abouzed DEE, Fadaly WAA. Novel di-aryl chalcone derived pyrazole linked to methane sulfonyl pharmacophore as potent selective COX-2 inhibitors; design, synthesis, molecular modeling, in vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory activities. Future Med Chem. 2025;17(15):1849–1865.
[18] Macarini AF, Sobrinho TUC, Rizzi GW, Corrêa R. Pyrazole-chalcone derivatives as selective COX-2 inhibitors: design, virtual screening, and in vitro analysis. Med Chem Res. 2019;28(8):1235–1245.
[19] Musa A, Mostafa EM, Bukhari SNA, Alotaibi NH, El-Ghorab AH, Farouk A, Nayl AA, Ghoneim MM, Abdelgawad MA. EGFR and COX-2 Dual Inhibitor: The Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Novel Chalcones. Molecules. 2022;27(4):1158.
[20] Hansch C, Fujita T. p-σ-π Analysis. A Method for the Correlation of Biological Activity and Chemical Structure. J Am Chem Soc. 1964;86(8):1616–1626.
[21] Askarzade A, Ahmadi S, Almasirad A. SMILES-based QSAR and molecular docking studies of chalcone analogues as potential anti-colon cancer. Sci Rep. 2025;15:6573.
[22] Soto M, Cabezas D, Stambuk F, González C, Acosta A, Lorca M, Espinoza L, Díaz K, Olea AF, Mellado M, Mella J. Integrated computational modeling of chalcone-based inhibitors targeting carbonic anhydrase I and II: 3D-QSAR, molecular docking, and dynamics simulations. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2026;40(1):123.
[23] Shamim A, Nadeem H, Masaud SM, Hussain T, Bashir K, Alrokayan S, Haq I, Latif M, Imran M, Irshad N. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel chalcone derivatives: integrating molecular docking with in vivo anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive studies. RSC Adv. 2026;16(4):2996–3020.
[24] Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;46(1–3):3–26.
[25] Veber DF, Johnson SR, Cheng HY, Smith BR, Ward KW, Kopple KD. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J Med Chem. 2002;45(12):2615–2623.
[26] Daina A, Michielin O, Zoete V. SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42717.
[27] Silverstein RM, Webster FX, Kiemle DJ, Bryce DL. Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compounds. 8th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
[28] Favre HA, Powell WH. Nomenclature of Organic Chemistry: IUPAC Recommendations and Preferred Names 2013. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2013.
[29] Furniss BS, Hannaford AJ, Smith PWG, Tatchell AR. Vogel's Textbook of Practical Organic Chemistry. 5th ed. Harlow: Longman Scientific & Technical; 1989.
[30] ICH Harmonised Guideline. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Q2(R1). Geneva: International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use; 2005.
[31] Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission. Indian Pharmacopoeia 2022. Ghaziabad: Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission, Government of India; 2022.
[32] Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):235–242.
[33] Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31(2):455–461.
[34] DeLano WL. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Schrödinger LLC; 2002. Available at: http://www.pymol.org.
[35] Landrum G. RDKit: Open-Source Cheminformatics Software. Available at: https://www.rdkit.org (accessed 2026).
[36] ElMchichi L, Belhassan A, Lakhlifi T, Bouachrine M. 3D-QSAR Study of the Chalcone Derivatives as Anticancer Agents. J Chem. 2020;2020:5268985.
[37] Lam KW, Uddin R, Liew CY, Tham CL, Israf DA, Syahida A, Abdul Rahman MB, Ul-Haq Z, Lajis NH. Synthesis and QSAR analysis of chalcone derivatives as nitric oxide inhibitory agent. Med Chem Res. 2012;21(8):1953–1966.
How to cite this paper
@article{1724050,
author = {Anushka Yadav, Raj Kumar},
title = {Design, Synthesis, QSAR and Molecular Docking of Substituted Chalcones as Selective COX-2 Inhibitors: A Review},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {2511-2522},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724050.pdf},
abstract = {Selective inhibition of the inducible cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) isoform, while sparing constitutive, gastroprotective COX-1, remains a central strategy for developing safer anti-inflammatory agents, and the chalcone scaffold, a chemically simple 1,3-diarylprop-2-en-1-one, has repeatedly proven amenable to the substituent patterning this selectivity requires. This review synthesises the rational design, synthesis and evaluation strategy proposed for a focused series of eight substituted chalcones (CH-1 to CH-8) built around a constant 4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl ring-A, the same sulfone-based pharmacophore established in celecoxib, fused through an enone linker to a ring-B bearing eight substituents spanning a wide Hammett sigma range from strongly electron-donating (4-N(CH3)2, sigma -0.83) to strongly electron-withdrawing (4-NO2, sigma +0.78). The structural basis for COX-2 selectivity, centred on the Val523-for-Ile523 substitution that opens a second hydrophobic side pocket in COX-2 but not COX-1, is discussed alongside the base-catalysed Claisen-Schmidt condensation route proposed for the series, the full spectroscopic and chromatographic characterisation strategy, RDKit-computed physicochemical and Lipinski-rule profiling, AutoDock Vina-based molecular docking against the COX-2 crystal structure, in-vitro COX-1/COX-2 inhibition and selectivity-index determination, and a Hansch-type quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) framework relating log(1/IC50) to Hammett sigma, calculated lipophilicity and topological polar surface area. Precedent from recent chalcone-COX-2 and chalcone-QSAR literature is drawn together to situate the proposed series, and in particular its combination of systematic electronic variation, parallel dual-isoform in-vitro screening, docking validation and Hansch-type QSAR modelling within a single internally consistent study, against the wider body of chalcone-based cyclooxygenase inhibitor design.},
keywords = {chalcones; cyclooxygenase-2; selective COX-2 inhibitors; Claisen-Schmidt condensation; Hammett sigma; molecular docking; Hansch QSAR; celecoxib},
month = {October},
}