Home / Current Issue / Paper 1724106
Building Material Cost Escalation and Residential Development Viability in Nigeria
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Real Estate
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I4-1724106
Abstract
This paper develops a context-sensitive conceptual framework to explain how building material price escalation affects the feasibility and financial viability of formal residential property development in Nigeria. It addresses the gap between studies documenting material cost pressures and appraisal research translating costs, revenues, development timelines, and required returns into investment decisions. The study adopts an integrative critical synthesis of Nigerian research on material costs and development uncertainty, international literature, and professional guidance on residual valuation, cash flow appraisal, and conceptual framework development. The review is selective rather than a registered systematic review. The framework proposes that the effects of material price shocks depend on outstanding procurement requirements, expenditure timing, land acquisition status, revenue flexibility, procurement arrangements, and financing conditions. It distinguishes residual land value, representing the maximum land payment a scheme can support, from the remaining development surplus available to developers who have already acquired land. By integrating material cost exposure, appraisal outcomes, and conditional adjustment mechanisms, the framework establishes a unified transmission model and derives five propositions for empirical testing. The framework supports developers, valuers and lenders in conducting scenario analyses, disclosing appraisal assumptions, and distinguishing liquidity pressures from underlying economic viability. As a conceptual study, it reports no original empirical estimates. Future research should test the framework using project appraisals, procurement records, material price histories, and financing cash flow data.
Keywords
building material cost; residential development; development viability; residual land value; investment uncertainty
References
[1] Abdulai RT (2025). Financial viability decision rules in residual valuation method of property development appraisal: Case study of London, England. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 30(1), 154–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMPC-04-2023-0014
[2] Adeyemo OA, Aruleba OB (2015). Assessment of impact of rise in price of building materials on real estate development: A case study of Lagos State, Nigeria. Journal of Construction Engineering, Technology & Management, 5(3), 52–58.
[3] Akanni PO, Oke AE, Omotilewa OJ (2014). Implications of rising cost of building materials in Lagos State, Nigeria. SAGE Open, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014561213
[4] Ayodele TO, Olaleye A (2022). Fundamental sources of uncertainty in real estate development: Perspectives from an emerging market. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(14), 2775–2787. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2020.1827182
[5] Baum A, Mackmin D, Nunnington N (2017). The income approach to property valuation (6th ed.). Routledge.
[6] Crosby N, Devaney S, Wyatt P (2018). The implied internal rate of return in conventional residual valuations of development sites. Journal of Property Research, 35(3), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09599916.2018.1457070
[7] Jaakkola E (2020). Designing conceptual articles: Four approaches. AMS Review, 10, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
[8] Kupec J, Dlask P (2020). Residual method used for commercial real estate valuation and its sensitivity. Business & IT, 10(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.14311/bit.2020.01.02
[9] MacInnis DJ (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136–154. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.75.4.136
[10] Obineme CH, Ndeche CB, Lawal SK (2026). Building material rising cost: Analyzing the rising construction material costs on real estate development activities in Enugu Metropolis, Enugu State (2021–2025). International Journal of Real Estate, 2(3), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22673706
[11] Ogunba OA, Ayodele TO, Akpan UE (2024). Improving African real estate pre-development appraisals through risk and uncertainty analysis. Paper presented at the 23rd African Real Estate Society Conference, Livingstone, Zambia. https://doi.org/10.15396/afres2024-050
[12] Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (2019). Valuation of development property (1st ed.). RICS, London.
How to cite this paper
@article{1724106,
author = {Agbonselobhor Osaze Akhere},
title = {Building Material Cost Escalation and Residential Development Viability in Nigeria },
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {2676-2694},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724106.pdf},
abstract = {This paper develops a context-sensitive conceptual framework to explain how building material price escalation affects the feasibility and financial viability of formal residential property development in Nigeria. It addresses the gap between studies documenting material cost pressures and appraisal research translating costs, revenues, development timelines, and required returns into investment decisions. The study adopts an integrative critical synthesis of Nigerian research on material costs and development uncertainty, international literature, and professional guidance on residual valuation, cash flow appraisal, and conceptual framework development. The review is selective rather than a registered systematic review.
The framework proposes that the effects of material price shocks depend on outstanding procurement requirements, expenditure timing, land acquisition status, revenue flexibility, procurement arrangements, and financing conditions. It distinguishes residual land value, representing the maximum land payment a scheme can support, from the remaining development surplus available to developers who have already acquired land. By integrating material cost exposure, appraisal outcomes, and conditional adjustment mechanisms, the framework establishes a unified transmission model and derives five propositions for empirical testing.
The framework supports developers, valuers and lenders in conducting scenario analyses, disclosing appraisal assumptions, and distinguishing liquidity pressures from underlying economic viability. As a conceptual study, it reports no original empirical estimates. Future research should test the framework using project appraisals, procurement records, material price histories, and financing cash flow data.},
keywords = {building material cost; residential development; development viability; residual land value; investment uncertainty},
month = {October},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1724106}
}