Home / Current Issue / Paper 1724216
Assessment of Noise Level in Christian Religious Centers in Obio/Akpor Lga in Rivers State
Subject area: Physical Sciences and Environment · Area of research: Noise Pollution in Religious Centers
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I4-1724216
Abstract
This study assessed noise pollution from Christian religious centers in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area, Rivers State, Nigeria, where rapid urbanization has created an unprecedented density of over 1,900 worship sites interspersed with residential neighborhoods. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was employed, measuring noise levels in 25 strategically selected churches representing Pentecostal, Protestant, and Orthodox denominations. Using a calibrated sound level meter, 75 readings were taken across background (non-worship), indoor service, and 50m external zones, capturing LAeq, Lmax, Lmin, L10, L50, and L90 parameters. Results indicated background noise averaging 53.21 dBA (SD=3.82), with 28% exceeding NESREA/WHO 55 dBA limits. Indoor service levels averaged 99.02 dBA (SD=10.44), with all 25 churches (100%) exceeding permissible limits, while external levels averaged 84.88 dBA (SD=9.74), also demonstrating 100% exceedance. Church X recorded the highest indoor levels at 113.03 dBA mean and 120.50 dBA peak. Percentile analysis revealed indoor L10 of 111.94 dBA, L50 of 100.70 dBA, and L90 of 84.20 dBA. Pollution Index values averaged 180.04% indoors (range: 151.03–205.52%) and 154.33% outdoors (range: 124.30–188.24%), categorizing all sites as severely polluted. Attenuation averaged 14.14 dB (range: 5.70–24.67 dB), with a significant paired t-test result (t=13.42, p<0.001). Strong indoor-outdoor correlation (r=0.87, p<0.01) confirmed direct noise spillover. Denominational analysis via t-test revealed significantly higher noise in Pentecostal centers (mean=108.76 dBA) compared to Catholic/Conservative churches (mean=85.08 dBA) (p<0.001). Structured questionnaires from 344 respondents yielded high perception indices for noise generation (3.82/5.00), health impacts including hearing risks (3.99/5.00) and stress (3.67/5.00), and community disturbance (3.79/5.00), yet moderate regulatory awareness (3.45/5.00). Grounded in socio-environmental theories, findings expose cultural rationalizations clashing with public health realities. The study recommends NESREA enforcement, acoustic retrofits, and denomination-specific guidelines to balance religious freedom with sustainable urban health.
Keywords
Christian religious center; noise pollution; noise level; environment; Obio/Akpor
References
[1] Adebayo A (2021). Balancing religious freedom and noise regulations in Nigerian cities. African Journal of Law and Society, 12(3), 45–62.
[2] Ajzen I (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
[3] Ajzen I (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
[4] Amoatey P, Omidvarborna H, Baawain M, Al-Mamun A (2020). Impact of pollution controls in urban areas on river water quality: A case study of the Greater Muscat area, Oman. Journal of Cleaner Production, 259, 120760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120760
[5] Ayeni A (2023). Noise pollution from religious activities in urban Nigeria: A review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 41234–41245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25678-9
[6] Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, Brink M, Clark C, Janssen S, Stansfeld S (2014). Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. The Lancet, 383(9925), 1325–1332. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X
[7] Bijsterveld K (2008). Mechanical sound: Technology, culture, and public problems of noise in the twentieth century. MIT Press.
[8] Clark C, Paunovic K (2021). Environmental noise in Europe: 2020. European Environment Agency Report, 22/2019. https://doi.org/10.2800/686249
[9] Diga FE, Tabe SN (2013). Noise levels in places of worship in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 2(5), 289–295.
[10] Egbenta IR, Uchegbu SN, Ubani O, Aluma CA (2024). Analysis of noise pollution level in Enugu Campus, University of Nigeria. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2024.121001
[11] Ekhator EO (2023). Environmental noise pollution regulations in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Environmental Law, 7(1), 45–67.
[12] Ewuma SO, Akpan EB, Ude KD (2025). GIS mapping of religious centers in Obio/Akpor LGA, Rivers State.
[13] Eze C (2023). Health effects of noise from religious centers in Africa. African Health Sciences, 23(2), 156–167.
[14] Farooqi ZR, Nasir MJ, Nasir N, Zeeshan N, Ayub I, Rashid A, et al. (2022). The use of theory of planned behavior to predict factors influencing fast food consumption among college students. PLoS ONE, 17(5), e0266864. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266864
[15] Festinger L (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
[16] Ihenacho RA (2023). Environmental noise research methods. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 25(4), 567–578.
[17] Juraga I, Bohac M, Zrnec T (2015). Noise control strategies. Journal of Noise and Vibration, 37(2), 45–58.
[18] Lazarus RS (1996). The role of coping in the emotions and how coping changes over the life course. In C. Magai & S. H. McFadden (Eds.), Handbook of emotion, adult development, and aging (pp. 289–306). Academic Press.
[19] Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer.
[20] Licitra G, Ascari E (2018). ISO 1996 applications in noise assessment. Applied Acoustics, 140, 145–152.
[21] Lilly-Tariah OB, Somefun AO, Ezeanolue BC (2017). Health effects of noise exposure levels among instrumentalists in Pentecostal churches in Port Harcourt. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice, 20(2), 185–191.
[22] Münzel T, Schmidt FP, Steven S, Herzog J, Daiber A, Sørensen M (2018). Environmental noise and the cardiovascular system. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 71(6), 688–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.015
[23] Oguntunde PG, Okagbue HI, Oguntunde PE, Odetunmibi OA (2019). A study of noise pollution measurements and possible effects on public health in Ota metropolis, Nigeria. The Open Public Health Journal, 12(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874944501912010111
[24] Okafor N (2022). Rationalizing noise in Pentecostal worship. Journal of Religious Studies, 45(3), 210–225.
[25] Ononugbo CP, Avwiri GO (2019). Noise levels and frequency response from religious houses in Port Harcourt City Local Government Area. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 7(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepp.20190701.14
[26] Ononugbo CP, Avwiri GO (2023). Health effects caused by noise in Africa: Evidence in literature from the past 25 years. African Health Sciences, 23(2), 145–156.
[27] Otoo E, Owusu AA, Sackey LN, Appiah K (2024). Assessment of noise levels in churches in the Kpone Katamanso Municipal Assembly in Ghana. Scientific World Journal, 2024,
[28] Oviasogie FO, Ikhudayisi A (2019). Implication of noise pollution on residents' wellbeing in Benin City, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Health, 81(7), 22–29.
[29] Prosser WL (1966). Public nuisance theory. California Law Review, 54(3), 997–1020.
[30] Sackey LN (2025). Urban noise pollution in Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly, Ghana: Implications for public health and quality of life. Journal of Urban Health, 101(2), 234–245.
[31] Schäfer T (2011). Social construction theory of noise. Journal of Social Psychology, 151(4), 456–478.
[32] Stansfeld SA, Matheson MP (2003). Noise pollution: Non-auditory effects on health. British Medical Bulletin, 68(1), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg033
[33] Sunny IE, Weli VE (2021). Noise pollution in urban societies: A case study in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science and Public Health, 5(2), 156–170.
[34] Tiwari TN, Mishra MA (1985). A preliminary assignment of water quality index of major Indian rivers. Indian Journal of Environmental Protection, 5(4), 276–279.
[35] Van Kempen E, Casas M, Pershagen G, Foraster M (2018). WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European Region: A systematic review on environmental noise and cardiovascular and metabolic effects: A summary. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(2), 379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15020379
[36] Yorkor B, Nteegah A (2019). Noise levels and frequency response from religious houses in Port Harcourt City Local Government Area. International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 7(1), 24–31.
How to cite this paper
@article{1724216,
author = {Ohonsi L. I., Ossia C.V., Ugwoha E.},
title = {Assessment of Noise Level in Christian Religious Centers in Obio/Akpor Lga in Rivers State},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {3259-3270},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724216.pdf},
abstract = {This study assessed noise pollution from Christian religious centers in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area, Rivers State, Nigeria, where rapid urbanization has created an unprecedented density of over 1,900 worship sites interspersed with residential neighborhoods. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was employed, measuring noise levels in 25 strategically selected churches representing Pentecostal, Protestant, and Orthodox denominations. Using a calibrated sound level meter, 75 readings were taken across background (non-worship), indoor service, and 50m external zones, capturing LAeq, Lmax, Lmin, L10, L50, and L90 parameters. Results indicated background noise averaging 53.21 dBA (SD=3.82), with 28% exceeding NESREA/WHO 55 dBA limits. Indoor service levels averaged 99.02 dBA (SD=10.44), with all 25 churches (100%) exceeding permissible limits, while external levels averaged 84.88 dBA (SD=9.74), also demonstrating 100% exceedance. Church X recorded the highest indoor levels at 113.03 dBA mean and 120.50 dBA peak. Percentile analysis revealed indoor L10 of 111.94 dBA, L50 of 100.70 dBA, and L90 of 84.20 dBA. Pollution Index values averaged 180.04% indoors (range: 151.03–205.52%) and 154.33% outdoors (range: 124.30–188.24%), categorizing all sites as severely polluted. Attenuation averaged 14.14 dB (range: 5.70–24.67 dB), with a significant paired t-test result (t=13.42, p<0.001). Strong indoor-outdoor correlation (r=0.87, p<0.01) confirmed direct noise spillover. Denominational analysis via t-test revealed significantly higher noise in Pentecostal centers (mean=108.76 dBA) compared to Catholic/Conservative churches (mean=85.08 dBA) (p<0.001). Structured questionnaires from 344 respondents yielded high perception indices for noise generation (3.82/5.00), health impacts including hearing risks (3.99/5.00) and stress (3.67/5.00), and community disturbance (3.79/5.00), yet moderate regulatory awareness (3.45/5.00). Grounded in socio-environmental theories, findings expose cultural rationalizations clashing with public health realities. The study recommends NESREA enforcement, acoustic retrofits, and denomination-specific guidelines to balance religious freedom with sustainable urban health.},
keywords = {Christian religious center; noise pollution; noise level; environment; Obio/Akpor},
month = {October},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1724216}
}