International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
[email protected]•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1724242

1724242 Vol 10 · Issue 4 Download Paper

Artificial Intelligence-Driven Talent Analytics and Employee Performance in Emerging Economies: A Conceptual and Opinion-Based Framework

Chika Omukpai PhD

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This conceptual paper examines the theoretical relationship between Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven Talent Analytics and employee performance in the context of emerging economies. Drawing on the Resource-Based View (RBV), Dynamic Capabilities Theory, and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the paper argues that organisations in developing markets that strategically deploy AI-driven talent analytics – encompassing predictive workforce planning, AI-based recruitment analytics, and performance forecasting systems – are better positioned to enhance key dimensions of employee performance, namely task efficiency, goal achievement rate, and productivity output. The paper contends that while AI-driven talent analytics holds transformative potential, its efficacy in emerging economies is conditioned by structural factors unique to these settings, including infrastructural deficits, talent ecosystem immaturity, and sociocultural dynamics. The paper advances a conceptual framework, proposes empirically testable hypotheses, and offers theoretical contributions alongside practical implications for policymakers, HR practitioners, and organisational leaders.

Keywords

AI-driven talent analytics; employee performance; emerging economies; predictive workforce planning; AI-based recruitment analytics; performance forecasting; task efficiency; goal achievement; productivity output

References

[1] Acemoglu D, Robinson JA (2019). The narrow corridor: States, societies, and the fate of liberty. Penguin Press.

[2] Angrave D, Charlwood A, Kirkpatrick I, Lawrence M, Stuart M (2016). HR and analytics: Why HR is set to fail the big data challenge. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(1), 1–11.

[3] Asongu SA, Nwachukwu JC (2016). The mobile phone in the diffusion of knowledge for institutional quality in sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 86, 133–147.

[4] Ayyagari M, Beck T, Demirguc-Kunt A (2015). Small and medium enterprises across the globe. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 415–434.

[5] Baard SK, Rench TA, Kozlowski SWJ (2015). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, 40(1), 48–99.

[6] Barney J (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

[7] Becker BE, Huselid MA (2015). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 16, 53–101.

[8] Betchoo NK (2016). Digital transformation and its impact on human resource management: A case analysis of two unrelated businesses. IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Innovative Business Practices, 267–270.

[9] Boudreau JW, Cascio WF (2017). Human capital analytics: Why are we not there? Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 4(2), 119–126.

[10] Bruton GD, Ahlstrom D, Obloj K (2022). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: Where are we today and where should the research go in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 1–14.

[11] Campbell JP (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organisational psychology. In MD Dunnette, LM Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organisational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 687–732). Consulting Psychologists Press.

[12] Campion MC, Campion ED, Campion MA (2023). Improvements in performance forecasting through machine learning approaches. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(5), 605–623.

[13] Cappelli P, Keller JR (2017). Classifying work in the new economy. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 575–596.

[14] Cheng MM, Hackett RD (2019). A critical review of algorithms in HRM: Definition, theory, and practice. Human Resource Management Review, 31(1), 100698.

[15] Collings DG, Mellahi K, Cascio WF (2019). Global talent management and performance in multinational enterprises: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Management, 45(2), 540–566.

[16] Davis FD (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

[17] Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2020). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.

[18] Festing M, Schafer L (2016). Generational challenges to talent management: A framework for talent retention based on the psychological-contract perspective. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 262–271.

[19] Griffin MA, Neal A, Parker SK (2017). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347.

[20] Helfat CE, Peteraf MA (2015). Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 831–850.

[21] Hoskisson RE, Wright M, Filatotchev I, Peng MW (2015). Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: The influence of institutions and factor markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1295–1321.

[22] Kamoche K, Siebers LQ, Mamman A, Newenham-Kahindi A (2015). The dynamics of managing people in the diverse cultural and institutional context of Africa. Personnel Review, 44(3), 330–345.

[23] Khanna T, Palepu KG (2020). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Harvard Business Press.

[24] Koopmans L, Bernaards CM, Hildebrandt VH, Lerner D, de Vet HCW, van der Beek AJ (2016). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(1), 6–28.

[25] Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P (2017). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.

[26] Lemieux T, MacLeod WB, Parent D (2018). Performance pay and wage inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 1–49.

[27] Liem CCS, Liem J, Mollahosseini A, Kaltwang S, Wu C, Hanjalic A, Gunes H, Mahoor MH (2018). Psychological, behavioural, and social responses to interviews. British Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 438–472.

[28] Marangunić N, Granić A (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81–95.

[29] Marler JH, Boudreau JW (2017). An evidence-based review of HR analytics. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(1), 3–26.

[30] Minbaeva DB (2018). Building credible human capital analytics for organizational competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 57(3), 701–713.

[31] Paauwe J, Guest DE, Wright P (Eds.) (2019). HRM and performance: Achievements and challenges. Wiley-Blackwell.

[32] Peteraf M, Barney J (2016). Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(4), 309–323.

[33] Rasmussen T, Ulrich D (2015). Learning from practice: How HR analytics avoids being a management fad. Organizational Dynamics, 44(3), 236–242.

[34] Tambe P, Cappelli P, Yakubovich V (2019). Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. California Management Review, 61(4), 15–42.

[35] Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (2017). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

[36] Tursunbayeva A, Di Lauro S, Pagliari C (2018). People analytics: A scoping review of conceptual boundaries and value propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 224–247.

[37] Upadhyay AK, Khandelwal K (2018). Applying artificial intelligence: Implications for recruitment. Strategic HR Review, 17(5), 255–258.

[38] van den Heuvel S, Bondarouk T (2017). The rise (and fall?) of HR analytics: A study into the future application, value, structure, and system support. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 4(2), 157–178.

[39] Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376.

[40] Viswesvaran C, Ones DS (2017). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216–226.

[41] Wernerfelt B (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.

[42] Wilden R, Gudergan SP, Nielsen BB, Lings I (2016). Dynamic capabilities and performance: Strategy, structure and environment. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 72–96.

[43] Zoogah DB, Peng MW, Woldu H (2015). Institutions, resources, and organisational effectiveness in Africa. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 7–31.

How to cite this paper

Chika Omukpai PhD "Artificial Intelligence-Driven Talent Analytics and Employee Performance in Emerging Economies: A Conceptual and Opinion-Based Framework" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 4 2026 Page 4630-4639
Chika Omukpai PhD "Artificial Intelligence-Driven Talent Analytics and Employee Performance in Emerging Economies: A Conceptual and Opinion-Based Framework" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 2026
Chika Omukpai PhD (2026). Artificial Intelligence-Driven Talent Analytics and Employee Performance in Emerging Economies: A Conceptual and Opinion-Based Framework. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(4).
Chika Omukpai PhD "Artificial Intelligence-Driven Talent Analytics and Employee Performance in Emerging Economies: A Conceptual and Opinion-Based Framework" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 2026.
@article{1724242,
      author = {Chika Omukpai PhD},
      title = {Artificial Intelligence-Driven Talent Analytics and Employee Performance in Emerging Economies: A Conceptual and Opinion-Based Framework},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {4},
      pages = {4630-4639},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724242.pdf},
      abstract = {This conceptual paper examines the theoretical relationship between Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven Talent Analytics and employee performance in the context of emerging economies. Drawing on the Resource-Based View (RBV), Dynamic Capabilities Theory, and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), the paper argues that organisations in developing markets that strategically deploy AI-driven talent analytics – encompassing predictive workforce planning, AI-based recruitment analytics, and performance forecasting systems – are better positioned to enhance key dimensions of employee performance, namely task efficiency, goal achievement rate, and productivity output. The paper contends that while AI-driven talent analytics holds transformative potential, its efficacy in emerging economies is conditioned by structural factors unique to these settings, including infrastructural deficits, talent ecosystem immaturity, and sociocultural dynamics. The paper advances a conceptual framework, proposes empirically testable hypotheses, and offers theoretical contributions alongside practical implications for policymakers, HR practitioners, and organisational leaders.},
      keywords = {AI-driven talent analytics; employee performance; emerging economies; predictive workforce planning; AI-based recruitment analytics; performance forecasting; task efficiency; goal achievement; productivity output},
      month = {October},
  }