Home / Current Issue / Paper 1724245
Effects of Bark Harvesting Intensity on the Phytochemical Composition of Vitellaria paradoxa and Prosopis africana in Selected Local Government Areas of Jigawa State, Nigeria
Subject area: Biological & Medical Sciences · Area of research: Science
DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I4-1724245
Abstract
Bark of Vitellaria paradoxa and Prosopis africana is widely harvested for traditional medicine in northern Nigeria, yet the effect of harvesting intensity on its phytochemical composition is poorly documented. This study compared the phytochemical composition of bark from overharvested (OH; ≥50% bark removed in the preceding two to three years) and minimally harvested (MH) trees in Kazaure, Gwiwa, Roni and Yankwashi Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Jigawa State, Nigeria. Seventeen bark samples (13 V. paradoxa, 4 P. africana) were screened qualitatively for eight phytochemical classes, and saponins, flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids and cardiac glycosides were quantified. All eight classes were present in every sample. In V. paradoxa, overharvested trees had significantly higher saponin (10.67 ± 1.59% vs 8.24 ± 1.85%; p = 0.028) and cardiac glycoside (0.86 ± 0.10% vs 0.73 ± 0.08%; p = 0.032) contents than minimally harvested trees, whereas flavonoid, tannin and alkaloid contents did not differ significantly. No significant differences were detected in P. africana, which was sampled in Kazaure only (n = 2 per group). Among LGAs, flavonoid content in V. paradoxa differed significantly (p = 0.017), being higher in Kazaure (17.50 ± 2.65%) than in Gwiwa (10.00 ± 1.73%; Tukey p = 0.035); the other compounds did not differ among LGAs. Saponin and cardiac glycoside contents were higher in overharvested than in minimally harvested trees in all four LGAs. Bark removal did not eliminate any screened phytochemical class and was associated with higher saponin and cardiac glycoside concentrations in V. paradoxa. Replicated sampling at larger scale is required to confirm these patterns and to relate them to tree health and sustainable harvesting.
Keywords
bark harvesting; phytochemicals; Vitellaria paradoxa; Prosopis africana; Jigawa State; medicinal trees
References
[1] D’Almeida SA, Gbomor SE, et al. (2024). A scoping review of the use of traditional medicine for the management of ailments in West Africa. PLOS ONE, 19(7), e0306594. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306594
[2] Gbadamassi R, Vodounnon MEJ, Badjana HM, Zirihi GN, Wala K, Batawila K, Akpagana K (2025). Ecological niche modeling of Prosopis africana (Guill., Perrot., and Rich.) Taub in Togo, West Africa under current and future climate conditions. Discover Environment, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-025-00230-w
[3] Harborne JB (1998). Phytochemical Methods: A Guide to Modern Techniques of Plant Analysis (3rd ed.). Chapman & Hall.
[4] Khan A, Kanwal F, Ullah S, Fahad M, Tariq L, Altaf MT, Riaz A, Zhang G (2025). Plant secondary metabolites—central regulators against abiotic and biotic stresses. Metabolites, 15(4), 276. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15040276
[5] Leaver J, Cherry MI (2025). Bark harvesting of commonly used medicinal tree species (Curtisia dentata and Ocotea bullata) along an elevation gradient in an Afro temperate forest in the Eastern Cape, South Africa: Population impacts and ecological implications. South African Journal of Botany, 186, 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2025.09.006
[6] Mjoli N, Shackleton CM (2024). Refugia for non-timber forest product populations: Prevalence and efficacy. Basic and Applied Ecology, 77, 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2024.04.003
[7] Mohammed I, Dompreh D, Duah-Gyamfi A, Brobbey LK, Boakye EA (2022). Post-exploitation bark recovery rates of some medicinal tree species in Ghana. Trees, Forests and People, 8, 100268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100268
[8] Ojo O, Kengne MHK, Fotsing MC, Mmutlane EM, Ndinteh DT (2021). Traditional uses, phytochemistry, pharmacology and other potential applications of Vitellaria paradoxa Gaertn. (Sapotaceae): A review. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 14(7), 103213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103213
[9] Shomali A, Das S, Arif N, Sarraf M, Zahra N, Yadav V, Aliniaeifard S, Chauhan DK, Hasanuzzaman M (2022). Diverse physiological roles of flavonoids in plant environmental stress responses and tolerance. Plants, 11(22), 3158. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11223158
[10] Sofowora A (2008). Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine in Africa. Spectrum Books.
[11] Szmechtyk T, Małecka M (2024). Phytochemicals from bark extracts and their applicability in the synthesis of thermosetting polymers: An overview. Materials, 17(9), 2123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17092123
[12] Yanda L, Tatsimo SJN, Tamokou JD, Matsuete-Takongmo G, Meffo-Dongmo SC, Lannang AM, et al. (2022). Antibacterial and antioxidant activities of isolated compounds from Prosopis africana leaves. International Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2022, 4205823. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4205823
How to cite this paper
@article{1724245,
author = {Mustapha Saidu Abdullahi, Sa’idu Akun Abdullahi, Aliyu Babale, Ibrahim Muhammad Danzomo},
title = {Effects of Bark Harvesting Intensity on the Phytochemical Composition of Vitellaria paradoxa and Prosopis africana in Selected Local Government Areas of Jigawa State, Nigeria},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {3322-3328},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724245.pdf},
abstract = {Bark of Vitellaria paradoxa and Prosopis africana is widely harvested for traditional medicine in northern Nigeria, yet the effect of harvesting intensity on its phytochemical composition is poorly documented. This study compared the phytochemical composition of bark from overharvested (OH; ≥50% bark removed in the preceding two to three years) and minimally harvested (MH) trees in Kazaure, Gwiwa, Roni and Yankwashi Local Government Areas (LGAs) of Jigawa State, Nigeria. Seventeen bark samples (13 V. paradoxa, 4 P. africana) were screened qualitatively for eight phytochemical classes, and saponins, flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids and cardiac glycosides were quantified. All eight classes were present in every sample. In V. paradoxa, overharvested trees had significantly higher saponin (10.67 ± 1.59% vs 8.24 ± 1.85%; p = 0.028) and cardiac glycoside (0.86 ± 0.10% vs 0.73 ± 0.08%; p = 0.032) contents than minimally harvested trees, whereas flavonoid, tannin and alkaloid contents did not differ significantly. No significant differences were detected in P. africana, which was sampled in Kazaure only (n = 2 per group). Among LGAs, flavonoid content in V. paradoxa differed significantly (p = 0.017), being higher in Kazaure (17.50 ± 2.65%) than in Gwiwa (10.00 ± 1.73%; Tukey p = 0.035); the other compounds did not differ among LGAs. Saponin and cardiac glycoside contents were higher in overharvested than in minimally harvested trees in all four LGAs. Bark removal did not eliminate any screened phytochemical class and was associated with higher saponin and cardiac glycoside concentrations in V. paradoxa. Replicated sampling at larger scale is required to confirm these patterns and to relate them to tree health and sustainable harvesting.},
keywords = {bark harvesting; phytochemicals; Vitellaria paradoxa; Prosopis africana; Jigawa State; medicinal trees},
month = {October},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1724245}
}