Digital Queue Management Systems: A Literature Review of Waiting-Time Estimation, Virtual Queues, and Service Operations

References

[1] Gans N, Koole G, Mandelbaum A. Telephone call centers: Tutorial, review, and research prospects. Manuf Serv Oper Manag. 2003;5(2):79–141. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.5.2.79.16071

[2] Ibrahim R. Sharing delay information in service systems: A literature survey. Queueing Syst. 2018;89:49–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11134-018-9577-y

[3] Ibrahim R, Whitt W. Real-time delay estimation based on delay history. Manuf Serv Oper Manag. 2009;11(3):397–415. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1080.0223

[4] Ibrahim R, Whitt W. Real-time delay estimation based on delay history in many-server service systems with time-varying arrivals. Prod Oper Manag. 2011;20(5):654–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2010.01196.x

[5] Smith JS, Nelson BL. Estimating and interpreting the waiting time for customers arriving to a non-stationary queueing system. In: Proc. Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). 2015. p. 2610–2621. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2015.7408369

[6] Benevento E, Aloini D, Squicciarini N, Dulmin R, Mininno V. Queue-based features for dynamic waiting time prediction in emergency department. Meas Bus Excell. 2019;23(4):458–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-12-2018-0108

[7] Thiongane M, Chan W, L’Ecuyer P. Delay predictors in multi-skill call centers: An empirical comparison with real data. In: Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Operations Research and Enterprise Systems (ICORES). 2020. p. 100–108. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009181401000108

[8] Zhang H, He QM, Zhao X. Balancing herding and congestion in service systems: A queueing perspective. INFOR Inf Syst Oper Res. 2020;58(3):511–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.2020.1734902

[9] Bidari A, Jafarnejad S, Faradonbeh NA. Effect of queue management system on patient satisfaction in emergency department: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2021;9(1):e59. https://doi.org/10.22037/aaem.v9i1.1335

[10] Robbins TR. The impact of mobile order ahead apps on QSR queuing. J Strateg Innov Sustain. 2021;16(2). https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v16i2.4298

[11] Ehrler F, Rochat J, Siebert JN, Guessous I, Lovis C, Spechbach H. Use of a semiautomatic text message system to improve satisfaction with wait time in the adult emergency department: Cross-sectional survey study. JMIR Med Inform. 2022;10(9):e34488. https://doi.org/10.2196/34488

[12] Yu Q, Zhang Y, Zhou YP. Delay information in virtual queues: A large-scale field experiment on a major ride-sharing platform. Manage Sci. 2022;68(8):5745–5757. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4448

[13] Deoraj S, Essop MS, Aroba OJ. Investigating a virtual queueing system for Durban University of Technology: A comprehensive review approach to improve efficiency. In: Proc. 2024 Conf. Information Communications Technology and Society (ICTAS). 2024. p. 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAS59620.2024.10507144

[14] Leemanza Y, Kristin E. Effectiveness of wait time targets and patient satisfaction feedback in decreasing wait times for prescription services in an outpatient pharmacy. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2024;77(1):e3438. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3438

[15] Jo EH, Chi OH, Kim J. How waiting decisions are made: A comparison of restaurant waiting equity and behavioral intentions in physical and virtual queues. J Hosp Tour Manag. 2025;63:140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2025.03.009

[16] Vergara K, Orozco MM. Virtual queuing management system towards client satisfaction and staff productivity in selected offices at University of Perpetual Help System—Pueblo de Panay. Int J Res. 2025;12(4):709–721. https://zenodo.org/records/15347517

@article{1724331,
      author = {Aryan Santosh Awale, Raj Chandrakant Dewarde, Aditya Vikram Pawal, Piyush Sachin Lohar, Prajakta K. Bujare},
      title = {Digital Queue Management Systems: A Literature Review of Waiting-Time Estimation, Virtual Queues, and Service Operations},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {4},
      pages = {3758-3769},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724331.pdf},
      abstract = {Digital queue systems represent service requests as trackable tokens, allowing progress to be monitored without the need for a physical line. The effectiveness of these systems is determined by how accurately they predict waiting times, how clearly they communicate updates, and how efficiently they support staff activities. This paper examines sixteen studies focusing on delay estimation, virtual queues, customer experience, and the evaluation of queue systems. The research highlights that recent service history and current queue status can provide reliable estimates, while fluctuating demand and limited data can affect accuracy. It also emphasizes that wait time information influences customer behavior, making it an integral part of the service experience rather than just an informational display. While studies show benefits in specific contexts, these findings cannot be directly applied to other service environments. We analyze the reviewed methods and their limitations, identify shortcomings in multi-organization queue systems, and connect these insights to the QueueEase system. The review recommends that evaluations should assess estimate accuracy, update reliability, access control, perceived fairness, and the workload of staff. QueueEase offers a prototype framework for this research; however, it has not yet been tested in a live pilot to confirm these outcomes.},
      keywords = {Digital queue; virtual queue; waiting-time estimation; delay information; service operations; multi-organization system},
      month = {October},
  }