Integrated Mechanical Completion, Pre-Commissioning and Performance Verification for Long-Distance Oil and Gas Pipeline and Pumping Station Projects in Saudi Arabia

References

[1] Nascimento DLM, Roeder AB, Calvetti D, Lopez AC, Gonzalez FR, Araujo F. Digital commissioning processes for the oil and gas sector. In: Proceedings of the 39th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC). 2022. p. 520–523. https://doi.org/10.22260/ISARC2022/0073

[2] Di Vito F. Pre-startup Safety Review Performance and Close-out Management for a New Licensed Petrochemical Plant. Chemical Engineering Transactions. 2020;82:25–30. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET2082005

[3] Abu Bakar A, Abdul Aziz H. Development of pre-startup safety review implementation tool for safe operation in process plant. Process Safety Progress. 2024;43(S1):S71–S77. https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12602

[4] Kumaran S, Musab AR. Assessment on PSM implementation maturity among major hazard installations in Malaysia. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2021;149:485–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.11.013

[5] Singh J, Anumba CJ. Building commissioning process and documentation: a literature review and directions for future research. International Journal of Construction Management. 2024;24(1):75–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2023.2211409

[6] Chime KC. Advancing portfolio project delivery and operation handover assurance through digitalization in the oil and gas. In: ADIPEC Conference Proceedings. 2024. SPE-222654-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/222654-MS

[7] Too J, Ejohwomu O, Bukoye T, Hui F, Oshodi O. Standardising the route to project handover to improve the delivery of major building projects. International Journal of Business Performance Management. 2023;24(2):175–199. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2023.129847

[8] Abdelkarim SB, Ahmad AM, Naji K. A BIM-Based Framework for Managing Handover Information Loss. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2024;40(5). https://doi.org/10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-5623

[9] Khan F, Yarveisy R, Abbassi R. Risk-based pipeline integrity management: A road map for the resilient pipelines. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering. 2021;1(1):74–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2021.02.001

[10] Yuan J, Mao W, Hu C, Zheng J, Zheng D, Yang Y. Leak detection and localization techniques in oil and gas pipeline: A bibliometric and systematic review. Engineering Failure Analysis. 2023;107060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107060

[11] Korlapati NVS, Khan F, Noor Q, Mirza S, Vaddiraju S. Review and analysis of pipeline leak detection methods. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering. 2022;2(4):100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2022.100074

[12] Sekhavati J, Hashemabadi SH, Soroush M. Computational methods for pipeline leakage detection and localization: A review and comparative study. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2022;77:104771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2022.104771

[13] Idachaba F, Rabiei M. Current technologies and the applications of data analytics for crude oil leak detection in surface pipelines. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering. 2021;1(4):436–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2021.10.001

[14] Wu T, Chen Y, Deng Z, Shen L, Xie Z, Liu Y, et al. Oil pipeline leakage monitoring developments in China. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering. 2023;3(4):100129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2023.100129

[15] Rahman MA, Barooah A, Khan MS, Hassan R, Hassan I, Sleiti AK, et al. Single and multiphase flow leak detection in onshore/offshore pipelines and subsurface sequestration sites: An overview. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 2024;90:105327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2024.105327

[16] Huang Y, Qin G, Yang M. A risk-based approach to inspection planning for pipelines considering the coupling effect of corrosion and dents. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2023;180:588–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2023.10.025

[17] Jiang F, Zhao E. Development of a hybrid cost-based risk integrity assessment model for burst failure of pipeline systems with interacting corrosion defects. Ocean Engineering. 2023;284:115154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115154

[18] Ahmed F, Eames I, Azarbadegan A, Moeendarbary E. Acoustics and vibrations in a complex piping network with pump startup–shutdown transients. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2022;227:107357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107357

[19] Han Y, Zou J, Gong B, Luo Y, Wang L, Presas Batlló A, et al. The use of model-based voltage and current analysis for torque oscillation detection and improved condition monitoring of centrifugal pumps. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. 2024;111781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2024.111781

[20] Fu Q, Liu Y, Zhang R, Ye Z, Qin H, Tao F, et al. Intelligent condition monitoring for the vertical centrifugal pump using multimodal signals and hybrid models. Measurement. 2024;115813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115813

[21] Cheng H, Guo Z, Zhang C, Liu W, Hao T, Song J, et al. Discussion on design standards of hydrostatic testing of gathering pipelines in oversea oil and gas fields. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation. 2021;40(4):474–480. https://doi.org/10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.04.018

[22] Reda A, Sultan IA, Shahin MA, McKee KK, Lagat C. Fitness-for-service analysis for corrosion resistant alloy clad pipeline damaged due to lodged intelligent pig. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. 2022;198:104683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104683

[23] Zhu C, Pu Y, Yang Y, Lyu Z, Li C, Yang Q. Localizing and tracking of in-pipe inspection robots based on distributed optical fiber sensing. Advanced Engineering Informatics. 2024;60:102424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2024.102424

[24] Wang T, Feng K, Ling J, Liao M, Yang C, Neubeck R, Liu Z. Pipeline condition monitoring towards digital twin system: A case study. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 2024;73:256–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.02.006

[25] Li Z, Liang Y, Liang Y, Liao Q, Wang B, Huang L, et al. Review on intelligent pipeline technologies: A life cycle perspective. Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2023;175:108283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108283

[26] Subramanian C, et al. Leakage of gasoil from side cut piping in crude distillation unit of a petroleum refinery. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering. 2022;2(1):97–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2021.05.001

[27] Ikudayisi AE, Chan APC, Darko A, Adedeji YMD. Integrated practices in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction industry: Current scope and pathway towards Industry 5.0. Journal of Building Engineering. 2023;73:106788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.106788

[28] Zhan H, Hwang B-G, Abdul Jabbar SBB. An Integrated Approach to Assessing Digitalization of Integrated Digital Delivery Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2025;151(6). https://doi.org/10.1061/JCEMD4.COENG-16149

[29] Prasshanth CV, Venkatesh SN, Mahanta TK, Sakthivel NR, et al. Fault diagnosis of monoblock centrifugal pumps using pre-trained deep learning models and scalogram images. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence. 2024;136:109022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109022

[30] Aljameel SS, Alabbad DA, Alomari D, Alzannan R, Alismail S, et al. Oil and Gas Pipelines Leakage Detection Approaches: A Systematic Review of Literature. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering. 2024;14(3):773–786. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsse.140310

@article{1724460,
      author = {Naveed Sajjad},
      title = {Integrated Mechanical Completion, Pre-Commissioning and Performance Verification for Long-Distance Oil and Gas Pipeline and Pumping Station Projects in Saudi Arabia},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {4},
      pages = {4492-4504},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724460.pdf},
      abstract = {Long-distance pipeline programmes can reach apparent construction completion while retaining unresolved threats to safe start-up, including undocumented weld repairs, inaccessible test boundaries, unstable pump controls and incomplete operating information. This critical review examines how mechanical completion, pre-commissioning and performance verification can be integrated into one auditable assurance process for Saudi Arabian oil and gas transmission projects. Its aim is to establish a technically defensible sequence of evidence-based release decisions rather than equate physical progress with operational readiness. Four objectives guide the synthesis: distinguish completion certificates from functional proof; evaluate pipeline cleaning, gauging, pressure testing and reinstatement; connect pumping-station dynamic testing with line-wide hydraulic behaviour; and develop a risk-sensitive handover framework appropriate to remote routes and multiple contractors. Relevant publications from 2020 to 2025 were examined using a structured narrative review and comparative assessment of commissioning, process safety, pipeline integrity, hydraulic transients and asset information research. The literature supports complementary but unequal forms of evidence. Static examination demonstrates installation conformity, pressure tests demonstrate bounded containment under specified conditions, and dynamic trials assess equipment and controls across representative operating states. None independently guarantees system readiness. An original five-gate assurance model is consequently proposed, with traceable test records, explicit hold points, configuration control and joint owner–contractor authorisation. Its application to Saudi infrastructure is presented as a reasoned adaptation of international findings, not as an empirically validated national benchmark. The review identifies outstanding needs for operationally representative acceptance trials, uncertainty-aware performance criteria and independent verification of electronic handover records.},
      keywords = {mechanical completion; pipeline pre-commissioning; pumping stations; performance verification; operational readiness; Saudi Arabia},
      month = {October},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I4-1724460}
  }