International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
[email protected]•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1724478

1724478 Vol 10 · Issue 4 Download Paper

Anthropomorphism in AI, Consumer Trust and Purchase Intention: A Secondary Data Study

Cheshta Agrawal Prachi Agrawal

Subject area: Management and Commerce  ·  Area of research: Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes embedded in consumer-facing channels such as chatbots, voice assistants and virtual shopping agents, brands increasingly give these systems human-like names, voices, faces and conversational styles. This paper examines how anthropomorphic design influences consumer trust and, through trust, purchase intention. Using a qualitative secondary-data approach, it synthesises peer-reviewed articles, industry reports and publicly available consumer survey material and analyses them thematically, without formulating or testing hypotheses. A generalised literature review, together with its limitations, frames the analysis. The qualitative findings indicate that human-like cues generally raise perceived warmth, social presence and credibility, which strengthens cognitive and affective trust, and that trust is the central pathway to purchase intention. The effect is conditional: excessive human likeness, privacy concerns, unmet expectations, and product, task and cultural factors can weaken trust. A conceptual framework and practical implications for brands designing AI interfaces are proposed.

Keywords

anthropomorphism; artificial intelligence; chatbots; consumer trust; purchase intention

References

[1] Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review. 2007;114(4):864–886.

[2] Nass C, Moon Y. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues. 2000;56(1):81–103.

[3] Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review. 1995;20(3):709–734.

[4] Mori M. The uncanny valley. Energy. 1970;7(4):33–35.

[5] Waytz A, Heafner J, Epley N. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2014;52:113–117.

[6] Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.

[7] Blut M, Wang C, Wünderlich NV, Brock C. Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: A meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2021;49:632–658.

[8] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

[9] Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):179–211.

[10] Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13(3):319–340.

How to cite this paper

Cheshta Agrawal, Prachi Agrawal "Anthropomorphism in AI, Consumer Trust and Purchase Intention: A Secondary Data Study" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 4 2026 Page 4585-4590
Cheshta Agrawal, Prachi Agrawal "Anthropomorphism in AI, Consumer Trust and Purchase Intention: A Secondary Data Study" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 2026
Cheshta Agrawal, Prachi Agrawal (2026). Anthropomorphism in AI, Consumer Trust and Purchase Intention: A Secondary Data Study. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(4).
Cheshta Agrawal, Prachi Agrawal "Anthropomorphism in AI, Consumer Trust and Purchase Intention: A Secondary Data Study" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 4, Oct. 2026.
@article{1724478,
      author = {Cheshta Agrawal, Prachi Agrawal},
      title = {Anthropomorphism in AI, Consumer Trust and Purchase Intention: A Secondary Data Study},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {4},
      pages = {4585-4590},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724478.pdf},
      abstract = {As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes embedded in consumer-facing channels such as chatbots, voice assistants and virtual shopping agents, brands increasingly give these systems human-like names, voices, faces and conversational styles. This paper examines how anthropomorphic design influences consumer trust and, through trust, purchase intention. Using a qualitative secondary-data approach, it synthesises peer-reviewed articles, industry reports and publicly available consumer survey material and analyses them thematically, without formulating or testing hypotheses. A generalised literature review, together with its limitations, frames the analysis. The qualitative findings indicate that human-like cues generally raise perceived warmth, social presence and credibility, which strengthens cognitive and affective trust, and that trust is the central pathway to purchase intention. The effect is conditional: excessive human likeness, privacy concerns, unmet expectations, and product, task and cultural factors can weaken trust. A conceptual framework and practical implications for brands designing AI interfaces are proposed.},
      keywords = {anthropomorphism; artificial intelligence; chatbots; consumer trust; purchase intention},
      month = {October},
  }