Home / Current Issue / Paper 1724521
Grounded Personal Memory Retrieval: A Location-Aware AI Assistant with Sentence-Level Verification for Cognitive Support
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Artificial Intelligence and Assistive Technology
DOI: 10.64388/ire1724521
Abstract
People with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease often cannot recall recent personal experiences. Conversational assistants built on large language models could help, but they carry a specific risk for this population: a user with memory impairment cannot check an answer against their own memory, so an unsupported statement may be accepted as a real memory. This paper presents a phone and web memory assistant that retrieves a user’s own recorded experiences by place and by plain-language question while constraining every answer to those records. Photographs, voice notes, and text notes are time-stamped and grouped into named places using geohash prefix search. Questions pass through a retrieval pipeline that refuses before any model call when nothing relevant exists, requires each drafted sentence to cite a retrieved record, and filters every sentence through a verification component that removes uncited, unretrieved, private, medical, or lexically unsupported content. Caregiver access is consent-based, deny-by-default, and visible to the user. We define six measurable grounding requirements and evaluate them on a synthetic persona with 32 records and 48 questions, without patient data. In offline mode, every statement was traceable to a retrieved record, no unsupported statement was produced, 9 of 10 unanswerable questions were refused, and all 28 answerable questions cited a correct record. We discuss the limitations of this evaluation and the work needed before clinical use.
Keywords
Alzheimer’s disease; assistive technology; grounding; hallucination; memory aids; mild cognitive impairment; retrieval-augmented generation
References
[1] World Health Organization. Dementia [Internet]. Fact sheet; 2023 Mar [cited 2026 Oct]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia
[2] Ali MT, Turetta C, Demrozi F, Pravadelli G. ICT-based solutions for Alzheimer’s disease care: A systematic review. IEEE Access. 2024;12:13944–13961.
[3] Ienca M, et al. Intelligent assistive technology for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: A systematic review. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017;56(4):1301–1340.
[4] Silva AR, Pinho MS, Macedo L, Moulin CJA. The cognitive effects of wearable cameras in mild Alzheimer disease – An experimental study. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2017;14(12):1270–1282.
[5] Treder MS, Lee S, Tsvetanov KA. Introduction to large language models (LLMs) for dementia care and research. Front. Dementia. 2024;3:1385303.
[6] Lewis P, et al. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. In: Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS). 2020. p. 9459–9474.
[7] Ji Z, et al. Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Comput. Surv. 2023;55(12):1–38.
[8] Xiao Y, Pan Q, Liu H, He Y, Zhang Y, Jiang N. Evaluating large language models for mild cognitive impairment among older adults: A bilingual comparison of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Kimi. Health Inform. J. 2025.
[9] Song Y, Lyu C, Zhang P, Brunswicker S, Dutt N, Rahmani A. DEMENTIA-PLAN: An agent-based framework for multi-knowledge graph retrieval-augmented generation in dementia care. 2025, arXiv:2503.20950. 2025.
[10] Ghorbel F, Ellouze N, Métais E, Hamdi F, Gargouri F. MEMO_Calendring: A smart reminder for Alzheimer’s disease patients. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Smart, Monitored and Controlled Cities (SM2C). 2017. p. 41–47.
[11] Peres B, Campos PF. A systematic review of reminder and guidance systems for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias patients: Context, barriers and facilitators. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2024;19(6):2133–2146.
[12] Kanno KM, Lamounier EA, Cardoso A, Lopes EJ, Mendes de Lima GF. Augmented reality system for aiding mild Alzheimer patients and caregivers. In: Proc. IEEE Conf. Virtual Reality 3D User Interfaces (VR). 2018. p. 593–594.
[13] Ye B, Chu C, Bayat S, Babineau J, How TV, Mihailidis A. Researched apps used in dementia care for people living with dementia and their informal caregivers: Systematic review on app features, security, and usability. J. Med. Internet Res. 2023;25:e46188.
[14] Choi SK, Yelton B, Ezeanya VK, Kannaley K, Friedman DB. Review of the content and quality of mobile applications about Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. J. Appl. Gerontol. 2020;39(6):601–608.
[15] Xin TL, Arshad A, Salam ZAbA. AlzBot – Mobile app chatbot for Alzheimer’s patient to be active with their minds. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE). 2021. p. 124–129.
[16] Kostis IA, Karamitsios K, Kotrotsios K, Tsolaki M, Tsolaki A. AI-enabled conversational agents in service of mild cognitive impairment patients. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Elect. Inf. Technol. (IEIT). 2022. p. 69–74.
[17] Kim E, Baskys A, Law AV, Roosan MR, Li Y, Roosan D. Scoping review: The empowerment of Alzheimer’s disease caregivers with mHealth applications. npj Digit. Med. 2021;4(1):131.
[18] Qamar N. A mobile application for Alzheimer’s caregivers. In: Proc. IEEE 10th Int. Conf. Healthcare Informat. (ICHI). 2022. p. 486–488.
[19] Coffman I, Resnick HE, Lathan CE. Behavioral health characteristics of a technology-enabled sample of Alzheimer’s caregivers with high caregiver burden. mHealth. 2017;3:36.
[20] Chokri R, Hanini W, Ben Daoud W, Chelloug SA, Makhlouf AM. Secure IoT assistant-based system for Alzheimer’s disease. IEEE Access. 2022;10:44305–44314.
[21] Scerri A, et al. Ethical issues associated with assistive technologies for persons living with dementia and their caregivers – An overview of reviews. Dementia. 2025 (online ahead of print).
[22] World Wide Web Consortium. Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 [Internet]. W3C Recommendation; 2018 Jun. https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
[23] Jones M, Bradley J, Sakimura N. JSON web token (JWT). Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 7519; 2015 May.
[24] Niemeyer G. Geohash [Internet]. 2008. http://geohash.org
[25] Sinnott RW. Virtues of the haversine. Sky Telesc. 1984;68(2):159.
[26] Moriarty K, Kaliski B, Rusch A. PKCS #5: Password-based cryptography specification version 2.1. Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC 8018; 2017 Jan.
[27] Government of India. The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. Act No. 22 of 2023; 2023 Aug.
How to cite this paper
@article{1724521,
author = {Aadesh Rathod, Shriya Mishra, Purva Dalvi, Siddhi Deshmukh, Dr. Ramesh Shahabade},
title = {Grounded Personal Memory Retrieval: A Location-Aware AI Assistant with Sentence-Level Verification for Cognitive Support},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {5},
pages = {77-86},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724521.pdf},
abstract = {People with mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer’s disease often cannot recall recent personal experiences. Conversational assistants built on large language models could help, but they carry a specific risk for this population: a user with memory impairment cannot check an answer against their own memory, so an unsupported statement may be accepted as a real memory. This paper presents a phone and web memory assistant that retrieves a user’s own recorded experiences by place and by plain-language question while constraining every answer to those records. Photographs, voice notes, and text notes are time-stamped and grouped into named places using geohash prefix search. Questions pass through a retrieval pipeline that refuses before any model call when nothing relevant exists, requires each drafted sentence to cite a retrieved record, and filters every sentence through a verification component that removes uncited, unretrieved, private, medical, or lexically unsupported content. Caregiver access is consent-based, deny-by-default, and visible to the user. We define six measurable grounding requirements and evaluate them on a synthetic persona with 32 records and 48 questions, without patient data. In offline mode, every statement was traceable to a retrieved record, no unsupported statement was produced, 9 of 10 unanswerable questions were refused, and all 28 answerable questions cited a correct record. We discuss the limitations of this evaluation and the work needed before clinical use.},
keywords = {Alzheimer’s disease; assistive technology; grounding; hallucination; memory aids; mild cognitive impairment; retrieval-augmented generation},
month = {November},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/ire1724521}
}