Home / Current Issue / Paper 1724650
Optimizing Business-to-Business Commercial Vehicle Leasing Contracts in Saudi Arabia: An Economic Model for Pricing, Risk and Long-Term Profitability
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Economic Model
Abstract
Commercial vehicle leasing is an arrangement whereby capital expenditure, asset management and certain operating risks are passed from the lessor to the business customer. In the Saudi context this is occurring at the same time as the growth of logistics activity, the diversification of transport demand and the increasing use of data in fleet management. A competitive rental quote is not necessarily a viable contract as the quoted payment will need to cover capital, maintenance, financing, expected credit losses and residual value exposure as well as allow for a degree of contractual flexibility. This paper reviews 30 publications (all with a DOI) from 2020 to 2025 and develops an integrated, risk-adjusted framework for business to business leasing decisions. The review is structured thematically around vehicle depreciation, customer credit, utilisation volatility, lifecycle cost, contract design and fleet renewal. The model proposed combines DCF, probability weighted loss, scenario analysis and contractual risk allocation. The illustrative calculations are of the decision process rather than actual estimates for the Saudi market. The findings suggest that pricing discipline is less about any one risk premium and more about the integration of the operational information, the enforceability of the service obligations, the return conditions and the renewal options. The paper's contribution is a transparent decision architecture through which both lessors and lessees can assess the profitability, affordability and service resilience of a leasing arrangement without having to assume that the future resale value or future utilisation will be guaranteed.
Keywords
commercial vehicle leasing; lease pricing; residual value risk; credit risk; discounted cash flow; Saudi Arabia
References
[1] Zhu J, Zhao Y, He P. Understanding the impacts on automobile leasing firm loss in China: an analysis of vehicle residual value risk and lease price patterns. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance. 2025;36(2):42–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcaf.22755
[2] Ko SB. Real option valuation using Weibull distribution: a new framework for depreciation risk management. Journal of Derivatives and Quantitative Studies. 2025;33(2):110–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/JDQS-10-2024-0041
[3] Chang YC, Chang KH, Chen WT. Vehicle leasing credit risk assessment modeling by applying extended logistic regression. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2023;45(4). https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-231344
[4] Kozina A, Kuźmiński Ł, Nadolny M, et al. The default of leasing contracts prediction using machine learning. Procedia Computer Science. 2023;225:424–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.027
[5] Kim M, Choi J, Kim J, et al. Trustworthy residual vehicle value prediction for auto finance. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2023;37(13). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v37i13.26842
[6] Alharbi A, Cantarelli C, Brint A. Crowd models for last mile delivery in an emerging economy. Sustainability. 2022;14(3):1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031401
[7] Alasmari T, Alzahrani A. Saudi Arabia’s shifts towards green and sustainable logistics: bibliometric and machine learning-based insights and forecasts. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2025;509:145577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145577
[8] Mutambik I. Digital transformation as a driver of sustainability performance: a study from freight and logistics industry. Sustainability. 2024;16(10):4310. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104310
[9] Alattas MI. The impact of technology on logistics services in Saudi Arabia. Archives for Technical Sciences; 2024. https://doi.org/10.70102/afts.2024.1631.379
[10] Alhujaili R, Albaqami M, Aboulola O, Khayyat M. E-government implementation’s impact on Saudi Vision 2030 to become an international logistic center. International Journal of Informatics and Communication Technology. 2023;12(2):180–187. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijict.v12i2.pp180-187
[11] Gil Ribeiro C, Silveira S. The impact of financial incentives on the total cost of ownership of electric light commercial vehicles in EU countries. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2024;179:103936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103936
[12] Sendek-Matysiak E, Pyza D, Łosiewicz Z, Lewicki W. Total cost of ownership of light commercial electrical vehicles in city logistics. Energies. 2022;15(22):8392. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228392
[13] Awan MA, Scorrano M. The cost competitiveness of electric refrigerated light commercial vehicles: a total cost of ownership approach. Future Transportation. 2025;5(1):10. https://doi.org/10.3390/futuretransp5010010
[14] Favier JC, Ganguly S, Shalpegin T. Optimal fleet policy of rental vehicles with relocation: a simulation study. Journal of Advanced Transportation. 2024;2024:7764326. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/7764326
[15] Aghazadeh D, Ertogral K. A fix and optimize method based approximate dynamic programming approach for the strategic fleet sizing and delivery planning problem. Central European Journal of Operations Research. 2025;33:91–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10100-024-00911-6
[16] Li M, Bolumole YA, Miller JW. Antecedents of spot and contract freight mix in the truckload sector. Transportation Journal. 2022;61(4):331–368. https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.61.4.0331
[17] Asgharieh Ahari S, Bakir I, Roodbergen KJ. A new perspective on carrier collaboration: collaborative vehicle utilization. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2024;163:104647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2024.104647
[18] Wang S, Sun W, Baldacci R, Elomri A. Exact solution of location–routing problems with heterogeneous fleet and weight-based carbon emissions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2025;193:103862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103862
[19] Markudova D, Mishra S, Cagliero L, et al. Preventive maintenance for heterogeneous industrial vehicles with incomplete usage data. Computers in Industry. 2021;130:103468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2021.103468
[20] Wang Y, Limmer S, Nguyen DV, et al. Optimizing the maintenance schedule for a vehicle fleet: a simulation-based case study. Engineering Optimization. 2022;54(7):1258–1271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2021.1919888
[21] Bone-Winkel GF, Reichenbach F. Improving credit risk assessment in P2P lending with explainable machine learning survival analysis. Digital Finance. 2024;6:501–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-024-00114-3
[22] Hou L, Lu K, Bi G. Predicting the credit risk of small and medium-sized enterprises in supply chain finance using machine learning algorithms. Managerial and Decision Economics. 2024;45(4):2393–2414. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4130
[23] Gu Z, Lv J, Wu B, Hu Z, Yu X. Credit risk assessment of small and micro enterprise based on machine learning. Heliyon. 2024;10(5):e27096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27096
[24] He K, Jia H, Mu Y, et al. Leasing business model for truck mobile charging stations: from the view of operators. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification. 2025;11(4):8811–8823. https://doi.org/10.1109/TTE.2025.3557026
[25] Urban L, Baur A, Soppert M, Steinhardt C. Scale matters: why the efficiency of free-floating vehicle sharing systems depends on the system’s scale. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2025;178:105169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2025.105169
[26] Xiao L, Zhang J, Wang C, Han R. Optimal fleet replacement management under cap-and-trade system with government subsidy uncertainty. Multimodal Transportation. 2023;2(2):100077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2023.100077
[27] Padmanabhan B, Huynh N, Ferrell W, Badyal V. Evaluation of three collaboration and profit sharing methods for carriers in pickup-and-delivery problems. Multimodal Transportation. 2023;2(2):100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.multra.2022.100066
[28] Suhadolnik N, Ueyama J, Da Silva S. Machine learning for enhanced credit risk assessment: an empirical approach. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 2023;16(12):496. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16120496
[29] Almatar KM. Smart transportation planning and its challenges in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Sustainable Futures. 2024;8:100238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100238
[30] von Glehn FR, Gonçalves BHP, Fagundes Neto MG, Fonseca JPS. Telematics and machine learning system for estimating the load condition of a heavy-duty vehicle. Procedia Computer Science. 2024;232:2616–2625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.02.080
How to cite this paper
@article{1724650,
author = {Muhammad Ghufran Jamil},
title = {Optimizing Business-to-Business Commercial Vehicle Leasing Contracts in Saudi Arabia: An Economic Model for Pricing, Risk and Long-Term Profitability},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {5},
pages = {219-232},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724650.pdf},
abstract = {Commercial vehicle leasing is an arrangement whereby capital expenditure, asset management and certain operating risks are passed from the lessor to the business customer. In the Saudi context this is occurring at the same time as the growth of logistics activity, the diversification of transport demand and the increasing use of data in fleet management. A competitive rental quote is not necessarily a viable contract as the quoted payment will need to cover capital, maintenance, financing, expected credit losses and residual value exposure as well as allow for a degree of contractual flexibility. This paper reviews 30 publications (all with a DOI) from 2020 to 2025 and develops an integrated, risk-adjusted framework for business to business leasing decisions. The review is structured thematically around vehicle depreciation, customer credit, utilisation volatility, lifecycle cost, contract design and fleet renewal. The model proposed combines DCF, probability weighted loss, scenario analysis and contractual risk allocation. The illustrative calculations are of the decision process rather than actual estimates for the Saudi market. The findings suggest that pricing discipline is less about any one risk premium and more about the integration of the operational information, the enforceability of the service obligations, the return conditions and the renewal options. The paper's contribution is a transparent decision architecture through which both lessors and lessees can assess the profitability, affordability and service resilience of a leasing arrangement without having to assume that the future resale value or future utilisation will be guaranteed.},
keywords = {commercial vehicle leasing; lease pricing; residual value risk; credit risk; discounted cash flow; Saudi Arabia},
month = {November},
}