Home / Current Issue / Paper 1724709
Impacts of Hydroponic Stratagem on Growth and Yield Performance Factors in Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum)
Subject area: Biological & Medical Sciences · Area of research: Water Culture: Hydroponics
DOI: 10.64388/ire1724709
Abstract
Food insecurity in Nigeria is exacerbated by seasonal shifts, high labor demands, and environmental degradation. To address these challenges and close the supply-demand gap for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), this study evaluated a robust, easy-to-operate hydroponic system for year-round cultivation. Two tomato varieties (UC and Ruma) were grown using two systems: a soilless hydroponic setup and a traditional soil-filled potted control under identical environmental conditions. Morphological and reproductive parameters were evaluated using ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc tests (p < 0.05). Results revealed that while soil-grown plants achieved significantly taller plant heights (Ruma Soil: 35.90 ± 0.13 cm), the hydroponic system dramatically enhanced vegetative and reproductive outcomes. The UC Hydroponic treatment yielded the highest mean number of leaves (32.65 ± 1.10), branches (11.09 ± 0.35), leaf size (13.89 ± 0.28 cm²), and stem girth (1.56 ± 0.03 cm), significantly outperforming all other groups (p < 0.001). Crucially, UC Hydroponics also recorded the highest reproductive metrics, including flower count (8.62 ± 1.08), fruit yield (12.78 ± 2.19), and fruit size (5.41 ± 0.49 cm). Both hydroponic treatments produced larger fruit sizes than their soil-based counterparts. These findings demonstrate that managed soilless cultivation optimizes vegetative growth and significantly enhances fruit traits. Consequently, this system offers a viable path toward year-round agricultural production, economic diversification, and food security in ecologically compromised regions.
Keywords
hydroponics; tomato cultivation; soilless agriculture; food security
References
[1] Abdullateef RA, Zainuddin ZB, Osman MB (2023). Impacts of gamma irradiations on the development of new mutants of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. EAS Journal of Biotechnology and Genetics, 5, 20–33.
[2] Adewumi TO, Bello A (2024). Financing agricultural innovation in sub-Saharan Africa: The role of public-private partnerships in hydroponic adoption. African Journal of Agricultural Economics, 19(2), 45–59.
[3] Allakhverdiev SI (2020). Optimising photosynthesis for environmental fitness. Functional Plant Biology, 47(11), iii–vii.
[4] Al-Gaadi KA, Zeyada AM, Tola E, Alhamdan AM, Ahmed KAM, Madugundu R, et al. (2024). Quantitative and qualitative responses of hydroponic tomato production to different levels of salinity. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany, 93(6), 1311–1323.
[5] Balliu A, Zheng Y, Sallaku G, Fernández JA, Gruda NS, Tuzel Y (2021). Environmental and cultivation factors affect the morphology, architecture and performance of root systems in soilless grown plants. Horticulturae, 7(8), 243.
[6] Caputo S (2022). History, techniques and technologies of soil-less cultivation. In: Small Scale Soil-less Urban Agriculture in Europe. Springer. p. 45–86.
[7] Capodaglio AG, Callegari A, Molognoni D (2016). Online monitoring of priority and dangerous pollutants in natural and urban waters: A state-of-the-art review. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 27(5), 507–536.
[8] Chen L, Wang Y, Zhao H (2025). Automation and labor dynamics in controlled-environment agriculture: A global review. Agricultural Systems, 210, 103–118.
[9] Dauda N, Adewuyi OS, Ishieze UP, Ugwuoke KI, Ukwu UN (2022). Farmer’s unseen enemy: Soilborne pathogens and its management. Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Science, 26(4), 112–125.
[10] FAO (2026). Global tomato production and market outlook. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[11] Fat H, Wong J, Tan S (2023). Advances in environmental data logging for precision agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 24(3), 567–582.
[12] Gonzali S, Perata P (2020). Anthocyanins from purple tomatoes as novel antioxidants to promote human health. Antioxidants, 9(10), 1017.
[13] Griebel S, Nelle L, Sango E (2022). Food and crisis: The role of controlled environment agriculture in building local food system resilience. Global Alliance for the Future of Food.
[14] Halbert-Howard A, Häfner F, Karlowsky S, Schwarz D, Krause A (2021). Evaluating recycling fertilizers for tomato cultivation in hydroponics, and their impact on greenhouse gas emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 59284–59303.
[15] Hassan FE, Alyafei MA, Kurup S, Jaleel A, Al Busaidi N, Ahmed ZF (2023). Effective priming techniques to enhance ghaf (Prosopis cineraria L. Druce) seed germination for mass planting. Horticulturae, 9(5), 542.
[16] Janssen A, Koller M, Müller T (2025). Sensor-based nutrient management in hydroponic systems: A meta-analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 210, 108–122.
[17] Khaleghi A, Sharifi Azad H, Mirdehghan SH (2024). Comparison of the growth, fruit quality, and physiological characteristics of tomato nourished by three different nutrient solutions in soil and soilless culture systems. Greenhouse Plant Production Journal, 1(2), 1–11.
[18] Kumar K, Acharya S, Verma VC, Tsewang T, Tiwari VK, Avantika A, et al. (2023). Comparative evaluation of physico-chemical response of tomato varieties under hydroponic technique vs soil cultivation in natural ventilated greenhouse at trans-Himalayan India. Vegetos, 36, 825–832.
[19] Kumar A, Mann A, Kumar A, Devi S (2018). Potential and role of halophyte crops in saline environments. In: Engineering Practices for Management of Soil Salinity. Apple Academic Press. p. 379–416.
[20] Makka TB, Murtala N, Idi S, Haruna U (2024). Cost and return analysis of irrigated upland tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) production in Gombe State, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Agriculture and Agricultural Technology, 4(1), 147–158.
[21] Nasir N, Sato T (2023). Effect of nutrient solution concentration on growth, yield, and fruit quality of tomato grown hydroponically in single-truss production system. Journal of Horticultural Research, 31(2).
[22] Ogunleye KY, Oladele OI, Adekunle AA (2025). Hydroponic adoption in urban Nigeria: Drivers, barriers, and policy implications. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 29(1), 34–48.
[23] Okoro EU, Nwachukwu CP (2024). Comparative nutritional analysis of hydroponically and soil-grown tomatoes in southeastern Nigeria. Food Science & Nutrition, 12(4), 2105–2117.
[24] Oladipo TA, Adebayo OS, Eze CN (2025). Molecular systematics of the Solanaceae in West Africa: Implications for crop improvement. African Journal of Plant Taxonomy, 14(2), 112–126.
[25] Olubanjo OO, Alade AE (2018). Growth and yield response of tomato plants grown under different substrates culture. Journal of Sustainable Technology, 9(2), 110–123.
[26] Sharma R, Gupta A (2025). Commercial hydroponics in India: Growth trends and economic viability. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 38(1), 89–102.
[27] Tajudeen AL, Taiwo OS (2018). Soilless farming—A key player in the realisation of “zero hunger” of the Sustainable Development Goals in Nigeria. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Engineering, 5, 1–7.
[28] Tunio MH, Gao J, Lakhiar IA, Solangi KA, Qureshi WA, Shaikh SA, et al. (2021). Influence of atomization nozzles and spraying intervals on growth, biomass yield, and nutrient uptake of butter-head lettuce under aeroponics system. Agronomy, 11(1), 97.
[29] Umar S, Adebayo A (2025). Soilless agriculture as a remediation strategy for oil-degraded lands in the Niger Delta. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 32(6), 4050–4064.
[30] USDA Plants Database (2025). Solanum lycopersicum L. Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from; 2025. https://plants.usda.gov
[31] Velazquez-Gonzalez RS, Garcia-Garcia AL, Ventura-Zapata E, Barceinas-Sanchez JDO, Sosa-Savedra JC (2022). A review on hydroponics and the technologies associated for medium- and small-scale operations. Agriculture, 12(5), 646.
How to cite this paper
@article{1724709,
author = {Abdullateef, R. A., Ogah, J., Abdullateef, R. M., Yusuf B. C., Mustapha Y.; Patience B.},
title = {Impacts of Hydroponic Stratagem on Growth and Yield Performance Factors in Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum)},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {5},
pages = {1763-1777},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724709.pdf},
abstract = {Food insecurity in Nigeria is exacerbated by seasonal shifts, high labor demands, and environmental degradation. To address these challenges and close the supply-demand gap for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), this study evaluated a robust, easy-to-operate hydroponic system for year-round cultivation. Two tomato varieties (UC and Ruma) were grown using two systems: a soilless hydroponic setup and a traditional soil-filled potted control under identical environmental conditions. Morphological and reproductive parameters were evaluated using ANOVA and Bonferroni post-hoc tests (p < 0.05). Results revealed that while soil-grown plants achieved significantly taller plant heights (Ruma Soil: 35.90 ± 0.13 cm), the hydroponic system dramatically enhanced vegetative and reproductive outcomes. The UC Hydroponic treatment yielded the highest mean number of leaves (32.65 ± 1.10), branches (11.09 ± 0.35), leaf size (13.89 ± 0.28 cm²), and stem girth (1.56 ± 0.03 cm), significantly outperforming all other groups (p < 0.001). Crucially, UC Hydroponics also recorded the highest reproductive metrics, including flower count (8.62 ± 1.08), fruit yield (12.78 ± 2.19), and fruit size (5.41 ± 0.49 cm). Both hydroponic treatments produced larger fruit sizes than their soil-based counterparts. These findings demonstrate that managed soilless cultivation optimizes vegetative growth and significantly enhances fruit traits. Consequently, this system offers a viable path toward year-round agricultural production, economic diversification, and food security in ecologically compromised regions.},
keywords = {hydroponics; tomato cultivation; soilless agriculture; food security},
month = {November},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/ire1724709}
}