Green in a Hurry? The Sustainability–Value Paradox in Customers’ Cognitive Evaluation of Quick Commerce Platforms

References

[1] Bain & Company (2026). How India shops online 2026 [Report prepared in collaboration with Flipkart]. Bain & Company. https://www.bain.com/insights/how-india-shops-online-2026/

[2] Blut M, Chaney D, Lunardo R, Mencarelli R, Grewal D (2024). Customer perceived value: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Service Research, 27(4), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705231222295

[3] Chavadi CA, Kokatnur SS, Sirothiya M (2024). Role of Q-commerce instant gratification on customer satisfaction: The moderating effect of green packaging. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(8), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i8/174185

[4] Davis FD (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

[5] Dunlap RE, Van Liere KD, Mertig AG, Jones RE (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176

[6] Farhat R, Yang Q, Ahmed MAO, Hasan G (2025). E-commerce for a sustainable future: Integrating trust, product quality perception, and online-shopping satisfaction. Sustainability, 17(4), Article 1431. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17041431

[7] Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

[8] Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M, Danks NP, Ray S (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

[9] Hasan MB, Verma R, Sharma D, Moghalles SAM, Hasan SAS (2024). The impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices on customer behavior towards the brand in light of digital transformation: Perceptions of university students. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2371063. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2371063

[10] Haws KL, Winterich KP, Naylor RW (2014). Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.11.002

[11] Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

[12] Hu L, Bentler PM (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

[13] Hudayah S, Ramadhani MA, Sary KA, Raharjo S, Yudaruddin R (2023). Green perceived value and green product purchase intention of Gen Z consumers: Moderating role of environmental concern. Environmental Economics, 14(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.14(2).2023.07

[14] Kim HW, Chan HC, Gupta S (2007). Value-based adoption of mobile internet: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009

[15] Kıymalıoğlu A, Yetkin Özbük RM, Aydın Ünal D, Dirlik O, Akar N (2024). Unpacking sustainable packaging through the stimulus-organism-response model: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241302320

[16] Kock N, Hadaya P (2018). Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal, 28(1), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131

[17] Miao M, Jalees T, Zaman SI, Khan S, Hanif N-A, Javed MK (2022). The influence of e-customer satisfaction, e-trust and perceived value on consumer’s repurchase intention in B2C e-commerce segment. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(10), 2184–2206. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-03-2021-0221

[18] Mume AH, Sun X (2026). Driving sustainable consumption online: The interplay of green digital marketing and digital literacy in shaping purchase intentions for sustainable coffee in urban Ethiopia’s e-commerce. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 21(1), Article 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer21010025

[19] Panesar A, Kakkar A, Sood R, Santos JD (2026). Understanding Q-commerce adoption: The role of technological, social, marketing stimuli, and service quality on usage intention. European Journal of Management Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJMS-06-2025-0079

[20] Pérez A, Rodríguez del Bosque I (2013). Measuring CSR image: Three studies to develop and to validate a reliable measurement tool. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 265–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1588-8

[21] Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

[22] Rana S, Shafi F, Rasheed A, Malik MI (2024). Online environmental platforms service and green consumer behavior nexus: A multi-mediator study. Future Business Journal, 10, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-023-00283-4

[23] Ringle CM, Wende S, Becker J-M (2024). SmartPLS 4 [Computer software]. SmartPLS, Bönningstedt. https://www.smartpls.com

[24] Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In: Homburg C, Klarmann M, Vomberg A (eds.), Handbook of market research, 587–632. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15

[25] Schoenmaker D, Schramade W (2019). Principles of sustainable finance. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[26] Shih IT, Silalahi ADK, Baljir K, Jargalsaikhan S (2024). Exploring the impact of perceived sustainability on customer satisfaction and the mediating role of perceived value. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2431647. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2431647

[27] Siddiqi KO, Rahman J, Tanchangya T, Rahman H, Esquivias MA, Rahman MH (2024). Investigating the factors influencing customer loyalty and the mediating effect of customer satisfaction in online food delivery services: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2431188. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2431188

[28] Sweeney JC, Soutar GN (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0

[29] Turker D (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9780-6

[30] Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

[31] Yum K, Kim J (2024). The influence of perceived value, customer satisfaction, and trust on loyalty in entertainment platforms. Applied Sciences, 14(13), Article 5763. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14135763

[32] Zeithaml VA (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302

[33] Zhao X, Lynch JG Jr, Chen Q (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257

@article{1724856,
      author = {Dr. Nagamani C G},
      title = {Green in a Hurry? The Sustainability–Value Paradox in Customers’ Cognitive Evaluation of Quick Commerce Platforms},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {5},
      pages = {1401-1412},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724856.pdf},
      abstract = {Purpose: Quick commerce platforms promise daily essentials within minutes, yet their packaging-intensive, last-mile-heavy model raises doubts about how sustainable they really are. This study examines how customers’ perceptions of a platform’s Sustainable Finance Orientation (SFO) shape their Customer Cognitive Evaluation (CCE) of the platform, with Customer Perceived Value (CPV) as a mediator and Environmental Concern (EC) as a moderator. Design/methodology/approach: A cross-sectional survey of 390 quick commerce users in Bengaluru, India, was analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) in SmartPLS 4 with bootstrapping. Findings: SFO significantly enhances CPV (β = 0.253, p < .001). Contrary to expectations, both CPV (β = −0.411, p < .001) and SFO (β = −0.090, p = .035) are negatively related to CCE, and CPV carries a significant negative indirect effect of SFO on CCE (β = −0.104, p < .001), yielding a negative total effect (β = −0.195). EC improves CCE directly (β = 0.158, p < .001) but does not moderate the SFO–CCE relationship. Originality/value: The study uncovers a sustainability–value paradox in ultra-fast retail: customers credit green initiatives with added value, yet judge the platform more critically. Sustainability orientation earns favourable evaluations only when it is credible, verifiable and visibly tied to customer benefits.},
      keywords = {Quick commerce; sustainable finance orientation; customer perceived value; cognitive evaluation; environmental concern; greenwashing scepticism; PLS-SEM},
      month = {November},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/ire1724856}
  }