Home / Current Issue / Paper 1724870
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and The Moral Economy: Social Choice, Exclusion and Sustainable Development in the Reckless AI Age
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: AI and The Moral Economy of the Workforce
Abstract
Today we inherit the reckless AI age. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming economic and social relationships in an unprecedented way. This article examines the emerging moral economy of AI with particular emphasis on its impact on vulnerable sections and economically disadvantaged communities in society including the informal sector workers and youth. Whether AI-driven economic decisions can reflect collective welfare rather than mere private profit and output is the dominant theme of this paper. Can economic system be considered efficient when AI system causes exclusion and inequality undermining social justice? This paper tries to connect the argument to Amartya Sen’s capability approach and Kenneth Arrow’s social choice theory and some empirical evidence on AI’s effects on labor and sustainable development. After reviewing neo classical paradigm and the economists who have questioned the economic efficiency alone approach the paper examines whether AI driven benefits are filtering down to the laboring poor in the dualistic labor markets in countries like India where the informal sector is expanding and is a survival mechanism for the laboring poor. This paper concludes by citing few hypotheses and making a strong case for a morally responsible AI regime for sustainable human development. Time has come to review the moral economy of the laboring class in the ICE age. The article tries to connect AI driven corporate restructuring and the recent Microsoft layoffs/ voluntary exit offer and attempts to examine the changing relationship between technological innovation and human labor.
Keywords
AI and economic efficiency; social choice; human capability; social exclusion; conflict in collective choice; AI and displaced workers; AI and youth employment; informal sectors; global youth unrest; moral economy
References
[1] Arrow KJ (1951). Social choice and individual values. Wiley, New York.
[2] Brynjolfsson E, Chandar B, Chen R (2026). Canaries in the coal mine? Six facts about the recent employment effects of artificial intelligence. Stanford Digital Economy Lab, Stanford, CA.
[3] Coleman A (2026). Introducing a voluntary exit offer. Official Microsoft Blog, 26 October 2026.
[4] Gallup (2025). Voices of Gen Z: How American youth view AI. Walton Family Foundation–Gallup, Washington, DC.
[5] ILO (2025). Generative AI and jobs: A review. International Labour Organization, Geneva.
[6] Korinek A, Stiglitz JE (2019). Artificial intelligence and its implications for income distribution and unemployment. In: Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (eds.), The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda, 349–390. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
[7] Liu and Zhang (2023). Socio-Economic Review. [Reference incomplete in the manuscript.]
[8] Niti Aayog (2023). Consultations and stakeholders: Youth and adolescents. Government of India, New Delhi.
[9] OECD (2025). OECD skills outlook 2025. OECD Publishing, Paris.
[10] Pareto V (1971). Manual of political economy. Augustus M. Kelley, New York.
[11] Polanyi K (1944). The great transformation. Farrar & Rinehart, New York.
[12] Scott JC (1976). The moral economy of the peasant: Rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press, New Haven.
[13] Sen A (1970). Collective choice and social welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco.
[14] Sen A (1985). Commodities and capabilities. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
[15] Sen A (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[16] Sujay C (2024). Overqualified and underemployed: India’s graduate crisis in the AI era. Frontline.
[17] Thompson EP (1971). The moral economy of the English crowd in the eighteenth century. Past & Present, 50(1), 76–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/past/50.1.76
[18] Weber M (2001). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Baehr P, Wells GC (trans.). Penguin, New York.
[19] World Economic Forum (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. World Economic Forum, Geneva.
How to cite this paper
@article{1724870,
author = {Dr. Mathew TV},
title = {Artificial Intelligence (AI) and The Moral Economy: Social Choice, Exclusion and Sustainable Development in the Reckless AI Age},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {5},
pages = {1508-1513},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724870.pdf},
abstract = {Today we inherit the reckless AI age. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming economic and social relationships in an unprecedented way. This article examines the emerging moral economy of AI with particular emphasis on its impact on vulnerable sections and economically disadvantaged communities in society including the informal sector workers and youth. Whether AI-driven economic decisions can reflect collective welfare rather than mere private profit and output is the dominant theme of this paper. Can economic system be considered efficient when AI system causes exclusion and inequality undermining social justice? This paper tries to connect the argument to Amartya Sen’s capability approach and Kenneth Arrow’s social choice theory and some empirical evidence on AI’s effects on labor and sustainable development. After reviewing neo classical paradigm and the economists who have questioned the economic efficiency alone approach the paper examines whether AI driven benefits are filtering down to the laboring poor in the dualistic labor markets in countries like India where the informal sector is expanding and is a survival mechanism for the laboring poor. This paper concludes by citing few hypotheses and making a strong case for a morally responsible AI regime for sustainable human development. Time has come to review the moral economy of the laboring class in the ICE age. The article tries to connect AI driven corporate restructuring and the recent Microsoft layoffs/ voluntary exit offer and attempts to examine the changing relationship between technological innovation and human labor.},
keywords = {AI and economic efficiency; social choice; human capability; social exclusion; conflict in collective choice; AI and displaced workers; AI and youth employment; informal sectors; global youth unrest; moral economy},
month = {November},
}