International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
[email protected]•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1724998

1724998 Vol 10 · Issue 5 Download Paper

Overt Incivility and Employee Withdrawal Behaviour in Public Owned Hospitals in South-South Region of Nigeria

Dr. Josiah-Hart, Inyingiwarifagha Valerie Dr. Emeribe, Adaobi C.

Subject area: Management and Commerce  ·  Area of research: Organizational Behavior

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between overt incivility and employee withdrawal behaviour in public hospitals in the South-south region of Nigeria, and determining the moderating ability of personality traits. A number of factors have been suspected to cause employee withdrawal behaviour, they include organisational climate, financial benefits, organisational structure and management’s attitude towards employees (Okache, 2020) which makes employee withdrawal behaviour even more glaring because it affects organisational performance negatively. The cross-sectional survey research design was adopted, as quantitative data was gathered through the use of a structured questionnaire. The accessible population of this study is 9610 senior staff (including doctors, nurses, laboratory scientists, pharmacists and administrators) from 12 selected public owned hospitals and a sample size of 369 employees derived through the Krejcie and Morgan table were used for the study. However, the Bowley’s (1964) formula was used in allocating the number of copies of the questionnaire to each healthcare facility. Overt incivility was measured using the Workplace Incivility Scale (WIS) and employee withdrawal behaviour was measured with the Employee Withdrawal Behaviour Scale (EWBS). The data collected was analysed by Spearman Rank Order Correlation Coefficient which was also used to indicate the strength and direction of these relationships. Findings revealed that there is a significant correlation between overt incivility and measures of employee withdrawal behaviour, with overt incivility and employee turnover behaviour exhibiting the strongest positive correlation coefficient of 0.762. Overt incivility and tardiness revealed the weakest positive correlation at 0.285. Personality trait was observed to be a potent moderator between the variables. The study concludes that employee withdrawal behaviour is ignited by overt incivility and recommends that the workplace culture and climate be made more conducive for better employee retention through management flexibility and readiness to prevent situations that encourage employee withdrawal behaviour.

Keywords

Overt incivility, personality traits, turnover, tardiness, withdrawal

References

[1] Achara LO, Onyemaechi U, Ufomba R (2020). Workplace incivility and employee retention in the hospitality industries in Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific Research & Growth, 2(5), 4011–230.

[2] Andersson LM, Pearson CM (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202131

[3] Andersson LM, Einarsen S (2009). Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Workplace Incivility Scale. Lund Psychological Reports, 14(1), 3–10.

[4] Bowling NA, Beehr TA (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 998–1012.

[5] Cherry K (2020). Trait theory of personality. Verywell Mind. https://www.verywellmind.com/psychology-4157187

[6] Edmonson C, Zelonka C (2019). Our own worst enemies: The nurse bullying epidemic. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000353

[7] Eysenck HJ (1990). Genetic and environmental contributions to individual differences: The three major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 58(1).

[8] Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (2024). Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare [Website]. https://www.health.gov.ng/

[9] Feist J (2016). Theories of personality (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

[10] Fiske AP (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99(4), 689–723. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689

[11] Fulmer IS, Ployhart RE (2014). “Our most important asset”: A multidisciplinary/multilevel review of human capital valuation for research and practice. Journal of Management, 40(1), 161–192.

[12] Goldberg LR (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In: Wheeler L (ed), Review of personality and social psychology, Vol. 2. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 141–165.

[13] Greenbaum RT, Mawritz M, Hui CM, Resick CJ (2017). Employee Machiavellianism to unethical behaviour: The role of abusive supervision as a trait activator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(5), 630–641.

[14] Halbesleben JR, Rathert C (2008). Linking physician burnout and patient outcomes: Exploring the dyadic relationship between physicians and patients. Health Care Management Review, 33(1), 29–39.

[15] Harris KT, Kacmar KM, Zivnuska S, Bryant PB (2007). Bullying, incivility, and psychological distress: Isolating social and organizational antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1152.

[16] Hobfoll SE (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513

[17] Hogh A, Hoel H, Carneiro IG (2011). Bullying and employee turnover among healthcare workers: A three‐wave prospective study. Journal Of Nursing Management, 19(6), 742–751.

[18] Johns G (2002). Absenteeism and mental health. In: Thomas JC, Hersen M (eds), Handbook of mental health in the workplace. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 437–455.

[19] Krejcie RV, Morgan DW (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

[20] McCrae RR, Costa PT (1987). Personality in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1001–1010.

[21] McCrae RR, Costa PT (1999). A five-factor model of human personality: The IPIP NEO personality inventory. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 195–217.

[22] Okache G (2020). Skill variety and employee withdrawal behaviour in telecommunication firms in Port Harcourt, Nigeria. International Academic Journal of Management and Marketing, 6(5), 32–46.

[23] Pennebaker JW, Francis ME (2006). Vocal expressions of anger and the perceived quality of social support. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 102.

[24] Porath C, Pearson C (2013). The price of incivility. Harvard Business Review, January–February 2013. https://hbr.org/2013/01/the-price-of-incivility

[25] Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB (2004). The job demands-resources model of work stress: A comprehensive approach. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 9(1), 3–16.

[26] Smith JR, Micich LA, McWilliams DL (2016). Organisation citizenship and employee withdrawal behaviour in the workplace. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 6(3), 43–62.

[27] Song C, Lee CH (2020). The effect of service workers' proactive personality on their psychological withdrawal behaviours: A moderating effect of servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(5), 653–667. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-04-2019-0149

[28] Tepper BJ, Duffy JC, Hoobler GM (2001). Consequences of workplace incivility: An investigation of the mediating effects of job satisfaction and perceived organisational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825–833.

[29] Ubagu MM, Achia US, Gbuushi JA (2020). Perceived effect of motivational strategies of promotion and work environment on the job performance of library personnel of universities in Benue State, Nigeria. Journal of Library Services and Technologies, 2(1), 79–89.

[30] Udealor CM (2020). Cynical behaviour and turnover intention of employees of private hospitals in Rivers State, Nigeria [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Port Harcourt Business School.

How to cite this paper

Dr. Josiah-Hart, Inyingiwarifagha Valerie, Dr. Emeribe, Adaobi C. "Overt Incivility and Employee Withdrawal Behaviour in Public Owned Hospitals in South-South Region of Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 5 2026 Page 2441-2450
Dr. Josiah-Hart, Inyingiwarifagha Valerie, Dr. Emeribe, Adaobi C. "Overt Incivility and Employee Withdrawal Behaviour in Public Owned Hospitals in South-South Region of Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 5, Nov. 2026
Dr. Josiah-Hart, Inyingiwarifagha Valerie, Dr. Emeribe, Adaobi C. (2026). Overt Incivility and Employee Withdrawal Behaviour in Public Owned Hospitals in South-South Region of Nigeria. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(5).
Dr. Josiah-Hart, Inyingiwarifagha Valerie, Dr. Emeribe, Adaobi C. "Overt Incivility and Employee Withdrawal Behaviour in Public Owned Hospitals in South-South Region of Nigeria" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 5, Nov. 2026.
@article{1724998,
      author = {Dr. Josiah-Hart, Inyingiwarifagha Valerie, Dr. Emeribe, Adaobi C.},
      title = {Overt Incivility and Employee Withdrawal Behaviour in Public Owned Hospitals in South-South Region of Nigeria},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {5},
      pages = {2441-2450},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1724998.pdf},
      abstract = {This study investigated the relationship between overt incivility and employee withdrawal behaviour in public hospitals in the South-south region of Nigeria, and determining the moderating ability of personality traits. A number of factors have been suspected to cause employee withdrawal behaviour, they include organisational climate, financial benefits, organisational structure and management’s attitude towards employees (Okache, 2020) which makes employee withdrawal behaviour even more glaring because it affects organisational performance negatively. The cross-sectional survey research design was adopted, as quantitative data was gathered through the use of a structured questionnaire. The accessible population of this study is 9610 senior staff (including doctors, nurses, laboratory scientists, pharmacists and administrators) from 12 selected public owned hospitals and a sample size of 369 employees derived through the Krejcie and Morgan table were used for the study. However, the Bowley’s (1964) formula was used in allocating the number of copies of the questionnaire to each healthcare facility. Overt incivility was measured using the Workplace Incivility Scale (WIS) and employee withdrawal behaviour was measured with the Employee Withdrawal Behaviour Scale (EWBS). The data collected was analysed by Spearman Rank Order Correlation Coefficient which was also used to indicate the strength and direction of these relationships. Findings revealed that there is a significant correlation between overt incivility and measures of employee withdrawal behaviour, with overt incivility and employee turnover behaviour exhibiting the strongest positive correlation coefficient of 0.762. Overt incivility and tardiness revealed the weakest positive correlation at 0.285. Personality trait was observed to be a potent moderator between the variables. The study concludes that employee withdrawal behaviour is ignited by overt incivility and recommends that the workplace culture and climate be made more conducive for better employee retention through management flexibility and readiness to prevent situations that encourage employee withdrawal behaviour.},
      keywords = {Overt incivility, personality traits, turnover, tardiness, withdrawal},
      month = {November},
  }