Home / Current Issue / Paper 1725033
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biopolymer-Based Stabilization of Expansive Clay Soils: Effects on Swelling, Strength, and Geotechnical Performance
Subject area: Physical Sciences and Environment · Area of research: Bi Polymer
Abstract
Expansive clay soils swell when wet and shrink when dry, which damages pavements and light structures. Biopolymers have been proposed as lower-carbon alternatives to lime and cement, but laboratory results vary. I conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of open-access laboratory studies, published by 30 April 2025, comparing biopolymer-treated with untreated expansive soils. OpenAlex returned 1,185 records within this date limit, of which 1,178 were unique. Fifty reports were sought; 12 open-access reports could be assessed, and eight studies were included. Effects were expressed as log response ratios, which compare treated with untreated values on a proportional scale. Because almost no study reported variability, study-level ratios were pooled without precision weighting and are presented with t-based 95% confidence intervals. Mean estimates favored treatment for swell (k = 6; -43.8%, 95% CI -72.8% to +16.4%), unconfined compressive strength (k = 4; +117.2%, 95% CI -15.3% to +456.6%), and plasticity index (k = 4; -59.2%, 95% CI -88.0% to +38.8%), but every confidence interval included no change. One study reported more swell after xanthan and guar treatment at 0.5%. The available evidence suggests possible average improvements but does not establish them. The certainty of these estimates is limited by few studies, unreported replication, restriction to open-access reports, single-reviewer screening, and a lack of field data.
Keywords
biopolymer, expansive soil, meta-analysis, soil stabilization, swelling, unconfined compressive strength
References
[1] Al-Mousawi, S. K., & Fadhil, S. H. (2025). Improving the engineering properties of highly expansive soil by adding psyllium seed biogel. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 15(1), 20328-20334. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.9329
[2] Andrew, R. M. (2018). Global CO2 emissions from cement production. Earth System Science Data, 10(1), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-195-2018
[3] Barman, D., & Dash, S. K. (2022). Stabilization of expansive soils using chemical additives: A review. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 14(4), 1319-1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.02.011
[4] Bukhary, A., & Azam, S. (2024). Flow through and volume change behavior of a compacted expansive soil amended with natural biopolymers. Geotechnics, 4(1), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics4010017
[5] Cai, Y., & Ou, M. (2023). Experimental study on expansive soil improved by lignin and its derivatives. Sustainability, 15(11), 8764. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118764
[6] Chang, I., Im, J., Prasidhi, A. K., & Cho, G.-C. (2015). Effects of xanthan gum biopolymer on soil strengthening. Construction and Building Materials, 74, 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.026
[7] Culbert, J. H., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Haupka, N., Schmidt, M., Donner, P., & Mayr, P. (2025). Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus. Scientometrics, 130(4), 2475-2492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05293-3
[8] Gupta, P. K., & Kumar, U. (2024). Modifying expansive soil characteristics with xanthan biopolymer integration. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 12(5), 2626-2636. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.62193
[9] Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999). The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology, 80(4), 1150-1156. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:TMAORR]2.0.CO;2
[10] Ikeagwuani, C. C., & Nwonu, D. C. (2019). Emerging trends in expansive soil stabilisation: A review. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 11(2), 423-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.08.013
[11] Kareem, S., & Fadhil, S. (2024). Improving the engineering properties of expansive clayey soils by adding biopolymer: A review. Al Rafidain Journal of Engineering Sciences, 2(2), 138-154. https://doi.org/10.61268/3bj9ry45
[12] Khajeh, A., Nazari, Z., Movahedrad, M., & Vakili, A. H. (2024). A state-of-the-art review on the application of lignosulfonate as a green alternative in soil stabilization. Science of the Total Environment, 943, 173500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173500
[13] Lajeunesse, M. J. (2015). Bias and correction for the log response ratio in ecological meta-analysis. Ecology, 96(8), 2056-2063. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-2402.1
[14] Lekha, B. M., Sarang, G., & Ravi Shankar, A. U. (2015). Effect of electrolyte lignin and fly ash in stabilizing black cotton soil. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 2(2), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-015-0020-0
[15] Mitchell, J. K., & Dermatas, D. (1992). Clay soil heave caused by lime-sulfate reactions. In ASTM Special Technical Publication (pp. 41-64). https://doi.org/10.1520/stp15529s
[16] Mousavi, F., Abdi, E., & Taheri, A. (2023). Effects of sodium nanoalginate and lime on swelling properties of expansive soils. Minerals, 13(12), 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/min13121515
[17] Nakagawa, S., Noble, D. W. A., Lagisz, M., Spake, R., Viechtbauer, W., & Senior, A. M. (2023). A robust and readily implementable method for the meta-analysis of response ratios with and without missing standard deviations. Ecology Letters, 26(2), 232-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.14144
[18] Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
[19] Petry, T. M., & Little, D. N. (2002). Review of stabilization of clays and expansive soils in pavements and lightly loaded structures: History, practice, and future. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 14(6), 447-460. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:6(447)
[20] Priem, J., Piwowar, H., & Orr, R. (2022). OpenAlex: A fully-open index of scholarly works, authors, venues, institutions, and concepts. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.01833
[21] Sathyapriya, S., Abdul Fasith, M. S., Senthil Kumar, P., & Karthik, V. (2023). Geotechnical investigation and microanalysis of black cotton soil amended with guar gum and polyethylene terephthalate fibre. International Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2023, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5277425
[22] Venu, M., Sampathkumar, V., & Rao, M. R. (2024). Sustainable soil stabilization: Strength and microstructural analysis of calcium lignosulfonate treated black cotton soil. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 681-692. https://doi.org/10.64252/vxx5sy41
How to cite this paper
@article{1725033,
author = {Ajah Benneth Kelechi},
title = {A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biopolymer-Based Stabilization of Expansive Clay Soils: Effects on Swelling, Strength, and Geotechnical Performance},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {8},
number = {9},
pages = {2099-2105},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1725033.pdf},
abstract = {Expansive clay soils swell when wet and shrink when dry, which damages pavements and light structures. Biopolymers have been proposed as lower-carbon alternatives to lime and cement, but laboratory results vary. I conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of open-access laboratory studies, published by 30 April 2025, comparing biopolymer-treated with untreated expansive soils. OpenAlex returned 1,185 records within this date limit, of which 1,178 were unique. Fifty reports were sought; 12 open-access reports could be assessed, and eight studies were included. Effects were expressed as log response ratios, which compare treated with untreated values on a proportional scale. Because almost no study reported variability, study-level ratios were pooled without precision weighting and are presented with t-based 95% confidence intervals. Mean estimates favored treatment for swell (k = 6; -43.8%, 95% CI -72.8% to +16.4%), unconfined compressive strength (k = 4; +117.2%, 95% CI -15.3% to +456.6%), and plasticity index (k = 4; -59.2%, 95% CI -88.0% to +38.8%), but every confidence interval included no change. One study reported more swell after xanthan and guar treatment at 0.5%. The available evidence suggests possible average improvements but does not establish them. The certainty of these estimates is limited by few studies, unreported replication, restriction to open-access reports, single-reviewer screening, and a lack of field data.},
keywords = {biopolymer, expansive soil, meta-analysis, soil stabilization, swelling, unconfined compressive strength},
month = {March},
}