International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
[email protected]•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1725083

1725083 Vol 10 · Issue 5 Download Paper

A Comparative Strength Properties Analysis of Machine and Manual Methods for Earth Blocks Stabilized with Unprocessed Sugarcane Bagasse

A. M. Manga I. B. Muhammed Y. M. Bukar M. A. Abukabar K. Hassan

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Construction Materials Stimulation

DOI: 10.64388/ire1725083

Abstract

The practice of earth as construction material has thrived for centuries across various parts of the world; however, challenges such as surface wear and low compressive strength continue to limit its structural application and long-term durability. This research addressed the inadequate mechanical performance of traditional earth blocks, which restricts their wider adoption as sustainable building materials. Enhancing the engineering properties of earthen materials offers a practical and energy efficient alternative to conventional construction techniques. In this study, clay soil samples were collected from Bauchi State, Nigeria. Preliminary tests, including moisture content and compaction analyses, were conducted. Blocks were produced at stabilization levels of 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% by weight, with dimensions of 300 mm × 145 mm × 105 mm, using both manual and machine compaction methods. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analysis was performed on unprocessed sugarcane bagasse to examine its textural structure. The soil exhibited a moisture content of 3.90%, while SEM results revealed a well-ordered matrix with fibrous morphology. Results showed that machine-compacted blocks absorbed 10.18% more moisture, displayed 4% higher wear resistance, and achieved 20.09% greater dry compressive strength than manually compacted. This research paper lies in the innovative use of unprocessed sugarcane bagasse as a natural stabilizing material, combined with a comparative evaluation of manual and machine compaction techniques. Providing new experimental insight into improving the mechanical properties of earth blocks through Sugarcane bagasse utilization and compaction optimization, thereby promoting sustainable and eco-friendly construction practices.

Keywords

Sugarcane bagasse, stabilized earth blocks, strength, wearing resistance, dry compressive strength

References

[1] Abdulkadir A, Maason N (2013). Recycling sugarcane bagasse waste into fired clay brick. International Journal of Zero Waste Generation, 1, 21–26.

[2] ARS 683 (1996). Compressed earth blocks — Standard for classification of material identification tests and mechanical tests. African Regional Organization for Standardization, Nairobi, Kenya.

[3] Bahar R, Benazzoug M, Kenai S (2004). Performance of compacted cement- stabilised soil. Cement & Concrete Composites, 26, 811–820.

[4] Binici H, Aksogan O, Shah T (2005). Investigation of fibre reinforced mud brick as a building material. Construction and Building Materials, 19, 313–318.

[5] Bock-Hyeng C, Ofori A, Yamb E, Shofoluwe M (2016). Sugarcane fibre-reinforced blocks as a sustainable construction material. In: Proceedings of the IAJC-ISAM Joint International Conference, California.

[6] British Standards Institution (2011). BS EN 772-1:2011 Methods of test for masonry units — Determination of compressive strength. BSI, London.

[7] British Standards Institution (1990). BS 1377: Methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes. BSI, Milton Keynes.

[8] Cirillo A, Giorgio P, Ulrico S, Nannina S (2008). Surface wear resistance of chemically or thermally stabilized earth-based materials. Materials and Structures, 41, 751–758.

[9] Deboucha S, Hashim R (2011). A review on blocks and stabilized compressed earth blocks. Scientific Research and Essays, 6, 499–506.

[10] Faria K, Gurgel R, Holanda J (2018). Recycling of sugarcane bagasse ash waste in the production of clay blocks. Journal of Environmental Management, 101, 7–12.

[11] Gaw B (2011). Soil reinforcement with natural fibers for low-income housing communities (Major Qualifying Project No. LDA-1006). Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA.

[12] Grimaldi MP, Marques MP, Laluce C, Cilli EM, Sponchiado SRP (2015). Evaluation of lime and hydrothermal pretreatments for efficient enzymatic hydrolysis of raw sugarcane bagasse. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 8, 205.

[13] Guettala A, Abibsi A, Houari H (2006). Durability study of stabilized earth concrete under both laboratory and climatic conditions exposure. Construction and Building Materials, 20, 119–127.

[14] Jeefferie AR, Nurul-Fariha O, Mohd-Warikh AR, Yuhazri MY, Sihombing H, Ramli J (2011). Preliminary study on the physical and mechanical properties of tapioca starch/sugarcane fiber cellulose composite. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 6.

[15] Karim MR, Zain MFM, Jamil M, Lai FC, Islam MN (2011). Necessity and opportunity of sustainable concrete from Malaysia’s waste material. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(5), 998–1006.

[16] Kerrou M, Bouslamti N, Raada A, Elanssari A, Mrani D, Slimani MS (2021). The use of sugarcane bagasse to remove the organic dyes from wastewater. International Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2021.

[17] Ramamurthy TN, Sitharam TG (2005). Geotechnical engineering. S. Chand and Company Limited, New Delhi.

[18] Saha K, Dwibedi P, Ghosh A, Sikder J, Chakraborty S, Curcio S (2018). Extraction of lignin, structural characterization and bioconversion of sugarcane bagasse after ionic liquid assisted pretreatment. 3 Biotech, 8, 374.

[19] Souza E, Teixeira R, Santos A, Costa B, Longo E (2011). Reuse of sugarcane bagasse ash to produce ceramic materials. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2774–2780.

[20] Turgut P, Yesilata B (2008). Physico- mechanical and thermal performances of newly developed rubber-added blocks. Energy and Buildings, 40, 679–688.

[21] Vilane BRT (2010). Assessment of stabilisation of adobes by confined compression tests. Biosystems Engineering, 106, 551–558.

[22] Zievie P, Yalley PP (2016). Evaluation of the strength properties of soil bricks produced with processed African locust bean waste water as stabiliser. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 5(1), 21–33.

How to cite this paper

A. M. Manga, I. B. Muhammed, Y. M. Bukar, M. A. Abukabar, K. Hassan "A Comparative Strength Properties Analysis of Machine and Manual Methods for Earth Blocks Stabilized with Unprocessed Sugarcane Bagasse" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 5 2026 Page 2482-2490 https://doi.org/10.64388/ire1725083
A. M. Manga, I. B. Muhammed, Y. M. Bukar, M. A. Abukabar, K. Hassan "A Comparative Strength Properties Analysis of Machine and Manual Methods for Earth Blocks Stabilized with Unprocessed Sugarcane Bagasse" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 5, Nov. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/ire1725083
A. M. Manga, I. B. Muhammed, Y. M. Bukar, M. A. Abukabar, K. Hassan (2026). A Comparative Strength Properties Analysis of Machine and Manual Methods for Earth Blocks Stabilized with Unprocessed Sugarcane Bagasse. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/ire1725083
A. M. Manga, I. B. Muhammed, Y. M. Bukar, M. A. Abukabar, K. Hassan "A Comparative Strength Properties Analysis of Machine and Manual Methods for Earth Blocks Stabilized with Unprocessed Sugarcane Bagasse" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 5, Nov. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/ire1725083
@article{1725083,
      author = {A. M. Manga, I. B. Muhammed, Y. M. Bukar, M. A. Abukabar, K. Hassan},
      title = {A Comparative Strength Properties Analysis of Machine and Manual Methods for Earth Blocks Stabilized with Unprocessed Sugarcane Bagasse},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {5},
      pages = {2482-2490},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1725083.pdf},
      abstract = {The practice of earth as construction material has thrived for centuries across various parts of the world; however, challenges such as surface wear and low compressive strength continue to limit its structural application and long-term durability. This research addressed the inadequate mechanical performance of traditional earth blocks, which restricts their wider adoption as sustainable building materials. Enhancing the engineering properties of earthen materials offers a practical and energy efficient alternative to conventional construction techniques. In this study, clay soil samples were collected from Bauchi State, Nigeria. Preliminary tests, including moisture content and compaction analyses, were conducted. Blocks were produced at stabilization levels of 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% by weight, with dimensions of 300 mm × 145 mm × 105 mm, using both manual and machine compaction methods. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analysis was performed on unprocessed sugarcane bagasse to examine its textural structure. The soil exhibited a moisture content of 3.90%, while SEM results revealed a well-ordered matrix with fibrous morphology. Results showed that machine-compacted blocks absorbed 10.18% more moisture, displayed 4% higher wear resistance, and achieved 20.09% greater dry compressive strength than manually compacted. This research paper lies in the innovative use of unprocessed sugarcane bagasse as a natural stabilizing material, combined with a comparative evaluation of manual and machine compaction techniques. Providing new experimental insight into improving the mechanical properties of earth blocks through Sugarcane bagasse utilization and compaction optimization, thereby promoting sustainable and eco-friendly construction practices.},
      keywords = {Sugarcane bagasse, stabilized earth blocks, strength, wearing resistance, dry compressive strength},
      month = {November},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/ire1725083}
  }