Adapting Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises to the Digital Scenario: A Practical Framework for Leveraging Sales

1Introduction

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play a central role in employment and economic activity, but they typically operate with limited financial resources, small teams and less access to specialized expertise than large corporations. These constraints shape how SMEs respond to technological change. The acceleration of digitalization during the COVID-19 pandemic made this challenge visible: many SMEs had to move their sales and communication to digital channels almost overnight in order to continue operating [1, 2].

Digital marketing offers SMEs opportunities that were previously available only to large firms, such as reaching specific audiences at low cost, measuring the results of each action and maintaining continuous relationships with customers [3, 4]. However, the mere presence on digital platforms does not guarantee results. Without a clear strategy, SMEs often adopt tools in a fragmented way, producing activity without corresponding growth in sales.

This study therefore examines how SMEs can adjust their marketing and business practices to the digital scenario in order to leverage sales. Its objective is to synthesize the literature into a practical framework that managers and consultants can apply in a structured and measurable way.

1.1Theoretical background

Digital transformation is commonly described as a process in three phases: digitization, in which analog information is converted into digital form; digitalization, in which digital technologies are used to improve existing processes; and digital transformation, in which the business model itself changes [5]. For most SMEs, the immediate challenge lies in the first two phases, but the long-term competitive advantage depends on reaching the third.

From a marketing perspective, digital technologies affect the entire process of value creation, from understanding customers to delivering and sustaining value [3]. Customer relationship management (CRM) provides a complementary lens: it emphasizes acquiring, retaining and developing profitable customer relationships over time, supported by information on customer behavior and value [6]. New media have intensified this logic by multiplying the channels through which customers interact with firms and with each other [7].

2Materials and methods

2.1Review design and source selection

This study adopts a narrative literature-review approach. Peer-reviewed articles and reference books published up to 2023 were selected on four themes: digital transformation of SMEs, digital marketing strategy, customer relationship management and marketing analytics. Priority was given to conceptual frameworks and empirical studies that address the practical adaptation of firms, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

2.2Framework development

The selected sources were analyzed qualitatively to identify recurring stages, practices and indicators associated with successful digital adaptation. These elements were then organized into a sequential framework. The framework is conceptual and is intended as a guide for practice; it does not result from new empirical testing. No ethical approval was required, as the study relies exclusively on published sources.

3Results and discussion

3.1Digital transformation paths in SMEs

Empirical evidence from the pandemic period shows that SMEs followed different digital transformation paths depending on their initial digital maturity and resources [1]. Firms with little prior digital experience typically began by moving sales and communication to digital channels, such as social networks, messaging applications and marketplaces. Firms with greater maturity were able to digitalize internal processes and, in some cases, redesign their business models [1, 8].

Studies of family-owned firms in Europe show a similar pattern: in the face of the crisis, firms combined short-term measures, such as cost reduction and liquidity protection, with a rapid adoption of digital tools to maintain contact with customers [2]. These findings suggest that digital adaptation is not a single decision but a sequence of steps whose pace depends on the firm’s starting point.

3.2Common obstacles

The literature identifies recurring obstacles to digital marketing in firms, many of which are more acute in SMEs. They include limited analytical talent, difficulty measuring the return on digital investments and the challenge of keeping up with the speed of technological change [9]. In addition, digital transformation requires changes in organizational structures and capabilities, not only in technology, which can be particularly demanding for small teams [5].

These obstacles help explain why SMEs often adopt tools without a clear strategy. Opening social media profiles or launching an online store without defining target customers, value proposition and success indicators tends to produce limited results. The framework presented below addresses this problem by organizing adaptation into stages with defined objectives.

3.3A practical framework for leveraging sales

Based on the literature, the digital adaptation of SMEs can be organized into six stages, summarized in Table 1. The first stage is a diagnosis of the customer journey and of the firm’s digital maturity, identifying how customers search, evaluate and buy, and where the firm currently stands [5, 10]. The second stage establishes an integrated digital presence, ensuring that the firm can be found and that customers can move easily between channels [4, 11].

The third stage concerns content and engagement. Relevant, useful content builds trust and engagement and supports the customer’s decision process, particularly in markets where purchase decisions require information [12]. Social networks and partnerships with creators can extend the reach of this content when they are consistent with the brand [13, 14].

The fourth stage structures customer relationship management. Recording interactions, segmenting customers and maintaining regular contact through e-mail, messaging and after-sales service help increase repurchase and customer value over time [6, 7]. The fifth stage introduces measurement through a small set of key performance indicators (KPIs) that connect marketing actions to sales, such as conversion rate, customer acquisition cost (CAC), retention and customer lifetime value (CLV) [6, 15]. The sixth stage institutionalizes continuous improvement through testing, learning and reallocating resources to the actions that produce the best results [5].

Stage	Objective and main actions	Example indicators
1. Diagnosis	Map the customer journey and assess digital maturity; identify channels, friction points and priorities [5, 10].	Share of sales by channel; main sources of customer inquiries.
2. Integrated digital presence	Ensure the firm can be found and contacted (website, search, social networks, marketplaces) with consistent information across channels [4, 11].	Website traffic; visibility in search; response time to inquiries.
3. Content and engagement	Produce useful content that answers customer questions; use social media and creators aligned with the brand [12–14].	Engagement rate; qualified leads generated by content.
4. Relationship management	Record interactions, segment customers and maintain regular post-sale contact [6, 7].	Repurchase rate; retention; customer satisfaction.
5. Measurement	Adopt a small set of KPIs that link marketing to sales results [15].	Conversion rate; CAC; CLV; return on marketing investment.
6. Continuous improvement	Test, learn and reallocate resources to the most effective actions [5].	Results of tests; evolution of KPIs over time.

Source: prepared by the author from the cited literature.

3.4Discussion

The framework emphasizes sequence and consistency rather than the adoption of advanced technologies. This is consistent with evidence that SMEs advance through digital transformation in stages and that early gains come from using accessible tools coherently [1]. It also reflects the view that digital marketing creates value when it is integrated with the firm’s strategy and customer relationships, rather than treated as a separate communication activity [3, 16].

An important implication concerns measurement. Many SMEs evaluate digital marketing through activity metrics, such as followers or posts, which do not necessarily reflect commercial results. Linking actions to indicators such as conversion, acquisition cost and customer lifetime value allows managers to decide where to invest limited resources and to justify those decisions [6, 15]. Equally important is the human dimension: SMEs often compete on proximity and personalized service, and digital tools should reinforce, not replace, these advantages [16].

3.5Limitations

The framework is derived from a narrative review and has not been empirically validated across sectors. SMEs differ widely in size, industry, resources and digital maturity, so the stages may need to be adapted, combined or reordered in specific contexts. Future empirical studies could test the framework and measure its effect on sales performance.

4Conclusion

SMEs face the digital scenario with fewer resources than large firms, but they can achieve meaningful sales gains by adopting digital marketing in a structured way. The literature indicates that successful adaptation follows a staged path that begins with understanding customers and the firm’s own digital maturity and progresses toward integrated channels, relevant content, structured customer relationships and measurement linked to sales.

The six-stage framework proposed in this article translates these findings into a practical sequence of objectives, actions and indicators. Its central message is that consistency, prioritization and continuous learning matter more than the volume of tools adopted. Future research should evaluate the framework empirically and examine how SMEs in different sectors can accelerate their progression through the stages.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CAC — Customer acquisition cost

CLV — Customer lifetime value

CRM — Customer relationship management

KPI — Key performance indicator

SMEs — Small and medium-sized enterprises

References

1. [1]Priyono A, Moin A, Putri VNAO. Identifying digital transformation paths in the business model of SMEs during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex. 2020;6(4):104. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040104
2. [2]Kraus S, Clauss T, Breier M, et al. The economics of COVID-19: initial empirical evidence on how family firms in five European countries cope with the corona crisis. Int J Entrep Behav Res. 2020;26(5):1067–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-04-2020-0214
3. [3]Kannan PK, Li HA. Digital marketing: a framework, review and research agenda. Int J Res Mark. 2017;34(1):22–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.006
4. [4]Chaffey D, Ellis-Chadwick F. Digital marketing: strategy, implementation and practice. 7th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2019.
5. [5]Verhoef PC, Broekhuizen T, Bart Y, et al. Digital transformation: a multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J Bus Res. 2021;122:889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022
6. [6]Kumar V, Reinartz W. Customer relationship management: concept, strategy, and tools. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2018.
7. [7]Hennig-Thurau T, Malthouse EC, Friege C, et al. The impact of new media on customer relationships. J Serv Res. 2010;13(3):311–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510375460
8. [8]Ritter T, Pedersen CL. Analyzing the impact of the coronavirus crisis on business models. Ind Mark Manag. 2020;88:214–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.014
9. [9]Leeflang PSH, Verhoef PC, Dahlström P, et al. Challenges and solutions for marketing in a digital era. Eur Manag J. 2014;32(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2013.12.001
10. [10]Lemon KN, Verhoef PC. Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. J Mark. 2016;80(6):69–96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420
11. [11]Shankar V, Kalyanam K, Setia P, et al. How technology is changing retail. J Retail. 2021;97(1):13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.10.006
12. [12]Hollebeek LD, Macky K. Digital content marketing’s role in fostering consumer engagement, trust, and value: framework, fundamental propositions, and implications. J Interact Mark. 2019;45:27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.003
13. [13]Appel G, Grewal L, Hadi R, et al. The future of social media in marketing. J Acad Mark Sci. 2020;48(1):79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00695-1
14. [14]Haenlein M, Anadol E, Farnsworth T, et al. Navigating the new era of influencer marketing: how to be successful on Instagram, TikTok, & co. Calif Manage Rev. 2020;63(1):5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125620958166
15. [15]Wedel M, Kannan PK. Marketing analytics for data-rich environments. J Mark. 2016;80(6):97–121. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0413
16. [16]Kotler P, Kartajaya H, Setiawan I. Marketing 4.0: moving from traditional to digital. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2017.