Home / Current Issue / Paper 1700906
Phishing Attack Detection Using Enhanced Classification Method
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Computer Engineering
Abstract
Phishing attack is major issue. The attacker steals the information from the users machine or insert a malware in that system. When the users are attracted to visit the web page the script is executed to carried out the its task. To detect and prevent these attack various tools and methods are developed. Various phishing detection techniques are proposed. But the phishing attacks are not completely detected because the attacker dynamically changing their approaches. In this paper we propose a dynamic approach which solution to any type of phishing attack. Our idea is to analyze the static and dynamic features of the web page to differentiate phishing and genuine web page using machine learning algorithms. The proposed approach correctly detects all phishing and genuine website without any false positive and negatives. It overcomes many drawback of the existing signature based approaches.
Keywords
Phishing, Web, Malware, Detection
References
[1] G. O. C. Estan, S. Savage, and G. Varghese, “Automatically inferring patterns of resource consumption in network traffic,” in Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Applications,Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communications (SIGCOMM), 2003, pp. 137–148.
[2] W.-K. “CERT Incident Note IN-99-07,” 1999. [Online]. Available: http://www.cert.org/incident
[3] H. “Planetlab testbed,” http://www.planet- lab.org.
[4] M. Locasto, J. Parekh, A. Keromytis, and S. Stolfo, “Towards Collaborative Security and P2P Intrusion Detection,” in Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Workshop on Information Assurance and Security, 2005.
[5] E. H. Miller, ―A note on reflector arrays (Periodical style—Accepted for publication), ‖ IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagate., to be published.
[6] J. Y. Hu, D. M. Chiu, and J. C. Lui, “Adaptive Flow Aggregation - A New Solution for Robust Flow Monitoring under Security Attacks,” in Tenth IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS), 2006, pp. 424–435.
[7] J. Jung, B. Krishnamurthy, and M. Rabinovich, “Flash crowds and denial of service attacks: characterization and implications for CDNs and web sites,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW), 2002, pp. 293–304.
[8] J. “CERT Advisory CA-1996-21 TCP SYN Flooding and IP Spoofing Attacks,” 1996. [Online]. Available: http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-1996- 21.html.
[9] CERT Advisory CA-2003-20 W32/Blaster worm,” 2003. [Online]. Available: http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA- 200320.html
[10] S. Gibson, “Distributed Reflection Denial of Service - Description and analysis of a potent, increasingly prevalent, and worrisome Internet attack,” 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www.grc.com/dos/drdos.html.
[11] S. S. Katti, B. Krishnamurthy, and D. Katabi, “Collaborating against common enemies,” in Internet Measurement Conference, 2005.
[12] S. S. S. Axelsson, “The Base-Rate Fallacy and Its Implications for the Difficulty of Intrusion Detection,” in ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 1999, pp. 1–7.
[13] S. G. K. Bhattacharyya and R. A. Johnson, Statistical concepts and methods. New York: Wiley, 1977.
[14] S. G. K. D. Karger, E. Lehman, T. Leighton, R. Panigrahy, M. Levine, and D. Lewin, “Consistent hashing and random trees: distributed caching protocols for relieving hot spots on the World Wide Web,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 1997, pp. 654–663.
[15] “Dshield org,” http://www.dshield.org.
[16] C. V. Zhou, S. Karunasekera, and C. Leckie, “Evaluation of a Decentralized Architecture for Large Scale Collaborative Intrusion Detection,” in the Tenth IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM), Germany, 2007, pp. 80–89.
How to cite this paper
@article{1700906,
author = {Jayakanthan N.},
title = {Phishing Attack Detection Using Enhanced Classification Method},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2019},
volume = {2},
number = {8},
pages = {1-4},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1700906.pdf},
abstract = {Phishing attack is major issue. The attacker steals the information from the users machine or insert a malware in that system. When the users are attracted to visit the web page the script is executed to carried out the its task. To detect and prevent these attack various tools and methods are developed. Various phishing detection techniques are proposed. But the phishing attacks are not completely detected because the attacker dynamically changing their approaches. In this paper we propose a dynamic approach which solution to any type of phishing attack. Our idea is to analyze the static and dynamic features of the web page to differentiate phishing and genuine web page using machine learning algorithms. The proposed approach correctly detects all phishing and genuine website without any false positive and negatives. It overcomes many drawback of the existing signature based approaches.},
keywords = {Phishing, Web, Malware, Detection},
month = {February},
}