Adequate Use and Implementation of Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS) in Nigerian Healthcare: A Conceptual Literature Review Approach.

References

[1] Barbash GI, Glied SA (August 2010) "New technology and health care costs--the case of robot-assisted surgery". The New England Journal of Medicine. 363 (8): 701–704. doi:10.1056/nejmp1006602. PMID 20818872. S2CID 15596885

[2] Dictionary.com (2023) what is telemanipulator, accessed 2023 from https://www.dictionary.com/browse/telemanipulator.

[3] National Library of Medicine (NLM, 2004) telemanipulator accessed 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3387765/

[4] Center for Devices and Radiological Health (2019) "Safety Communications – Caution When Using Robotically-Assisted Surgical Devices in Women's Health including Mastectomy and Other Cancer-Related Surgeries: FDA Safety Communication". www.fda.gov. Retrieved 6 March 2023

[5] Lauterbach R, Matanes E, Lowenstein L (2017). Robotic surgery "Review of Robotic Surgery in Gynecology-The Future Is Here". Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal. 8 (2): e0019. doi:10.5041/rmmj.10296. PMC 5415365. PMID 28467761

[6] Day B (2014) Arthrobot - the world's first surgical robot, YouTube. Archived from the original on 21 December 2021. Retrieved 23/10/2023 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robot-assisted_surgery

[7] Kwoh YS, Hou J, Jonckheere EA, Hayati S (1988) A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery". IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering. 35 (2): 153–160. doi:10.1109/10.1354. PMID 3280462. S2CID 31260974

[8] Andellini M, Di Mauro R, Faggiano F, Derrico P, Ritrovato M (2019). PP187 Robotic Surgery, Any Updates?. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 35 (S1): 72. doi:10.1017/S0266462319002757. ISSN 0266-4623. S2CID 214168249.

[9] Paul HA, Bargar WL, Mittlestadt B, Musits B, Taylor RH, Kazanzides P, et al. (1992). "Development of a surgical robot for cementless total hip arthroplasty". Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 285 (285): 57–66. doi:10.1097/00003086-199212000-00010. PMID 1446455. S2CID 25245838.

[10] Intuitive Surgical (2021) surgical robot, da Vinci Surgical System, Intuitive Surgical from https://isrg.intuitive.com › static-files

[11] Meadows M (2005). "Computer-assisted surgery: an update". FDA Consumer. Food and Drug Administration. 39 (4): 16–17. PMID 16252396. Archived from the original on 1 March 2009.

[12] McConnell PI, Schneeberger EW, Michler RE (2003). "History and development of robotic cardiac surgery". Problems in General Surgery. 20 (2): 20–30. doi:10.1097/01.sgs.0000081182.03671.6e

[13] NHS (2018) New Versius robot surgery system coming to NHS gotten from BBC. 3 September 2018 and Retrieved 23 september 2023

[14] Finkelstein J, Eckersberger E, Sadri H, Taneja SS, Lepor H, Djavan B (2010). "Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: The European and US Experience"

[15] Gerhardus D (2003). "Robot-assisted surgery: the future is here". Journal of Healthcare Management. 48 (4): 242–251.

[16] Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW (1995). "Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control". The Journal of Urology. 154 (6): 2134–2136.

[17] AORN (2017) Robotic Surgery: Risks vs. Rewards". AORN Journal. 106 (2): 186–157.. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2017.05.007. PMID 28755672

[18] Spinelli A, David G, Gidaro S, Carvello M, Sacchi M, Montorsi M, Montroni I (2017). "First experience in colorectal surgery with a new robotic platform with haptic feedback". Colorectal Disease. 20 (3): 228–235. doi:10.1111/codi.13882. PMID 28905524. S2CID 11253068

[19] Breeden JT (2013). "Statement on Robotic Surgery". American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).

[20] Herron DM, Marohn M (2008). "A consensus document on robotic surgery". Surgical Endoscopy. 22 (2): 313–325, discussion 311–312. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9727-5. PMID 18163170. S2CID 6880837.

[21] Kolata G (2010). "Results Unproven, Robotic Surgery Wins Converts". The New York Times. Retrieved 11 March 2010.

@article{1705437,
      author = {Oguoma Ikechukwu Stanley, Uka Kanayo Kizito, Ebele Precious Okemba, Chukwu Alphonsus Chekwube, Nwankwo Chekwube Georgina; Ajero Chukwuka Evans},
      title = {Adequate Use and Implementation of Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS) in Nigerian Healthcare: A Conceptual Literature Review Approach.},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2024},
      volume = {7},
      number = {7},
      pages = {430-440},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1705437.pdf},
      abstract = {This study was motivated due to the identified problems and issues surrounding the implementation and adoption of artificial intelligent (AI) and its adoption to reduce if not all the rate of health challenges associated with surgery handling witnessed in our healthcare centres especially during emergency situations when the professional surgeon are not within the healthcare centre. The problems includes: poor technological infrastructure in the healthcare centres, there is no documented use of any of the past utilized surgical robot in the history of Nigerian medicine, negligence of those in power to provide basic tools/training to support use of RAS in the healthcare, lack of AI industry to support/provide easy training and implementation of RAS in the healthcare The western world such as United State of America, United Kingdom and china as mentioned in the study has invested so much in their healthcare systems while Africa (eg. Nigeria) is still battling with corrupt a practice which has caused the increase of mortality rate of their citizens. The aim is to assess the use of robotic assisted surgery (RAS) within and outside Nigeria while the objectives of this research is to assess the use of RAS in Nigerian healthcare centres, to assess traditional methods of surgery and adoption of RAS, to outline the significance of RAS Nigerian healthcare for better health delivery and accurate outcome, to outline the other health application areas RAS can be used in treatment and to state advantages and disadvantages of the use of RAS in Nigerian healthcare. The study adopted conceptual review of literature publications, journal studies, magazine, social media discussions and medical professional discussions on use and significance of RAS with more emphasis to application and adoption of RAS in Nigeria and how prepared artificial intelligence in Nigeria is seen compared to other counties. The result was able to show the various limitations on the use of RAS and its complications when applied in surgical operation and also reviled that Nigerian has no plans on the adoption of RAS and AI industry that could help in production and maintenance of AI system such as RAS and hence suggest that National computer society of Nigeria (NCS), ministry of health , ministry of technologies and other robotic organizations in Nigeria should team up to ensure that computer aided devices (RAS) are provided and provide adequate training and asses to tools for personnel?s and healthcare centres to use.},
      keywords = {Artificial Intelligence, Robotic Assisted Surgery (RAS), Robotic Use in Nigerian Healthcare},
      month = {January},
  }