A Techno-Economic Model of Continuous Versus Intermittent Methane Monitoring Programs

References

[1] ADEGBOYE, M. A., FUNG, W.-K. & KARNIK, A. 2019. Recent advances in pipeline monitoring and oil leakage detection technologies: Principles and approaches. Sensors, 19, 2548.

[2] AHMED, A., HASSAN, I., IBN-MOHAMMED, T., MOSTAFA, H., REANEY, I. M., KOH, L. S., ZU, J. & WANG, Z. L. 2017. Environmental life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis of triboelectric nanogenerators. Energy & Environmental Science, 10, 653-671.

[3] AJAYI, T., GOMES, J. S. & BERA, A. 2019. A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches. Petroleum Science, 16, 1028-1063.

[4] ALKADI, N., CHOW, J., HOWE, K., POTYRAILO, R., ABDILGHANIE, A., JAYARAMAN, B., ALLAMRAJU, R., WESTERHEIDE, J., CORCORAN, J. & DI FILIPPO, V. Ubiquitous sensing network for continuous monitoring and quantification of methane emissions. SPE Offshore Europe Conference and Exhibition, 2019. SPE, D021S004R007.

[5] BALAFOUTIS, A., BECK, B., FOUNTAS, S., VANGEYTE, J., VAN DER WAL, T., SOTO, I., GÓMEZ-BARBERO, M., BARNES, A. & EORY, V. 2017. Precision agriculture technologies positively contributing to GHG emissions mitigation, farm productivity and economics. Sustainability, 9, 1339.

[6] BALCOMBE, P., ANDERSON, K., SPEIRS, J., BRANDON, N. & HAWKES, A. 2017. The natural gas supply chain: the importance of methane and carbon dioxide emissions. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 5, 3-20.

[7] BALCOMBE, P., SPEIRS, J. F., BRANDON, N. P. & HAWKES, A. D. 2018. Methane emissions: choosing the right climate metric and time horizon. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, 20, 1323-1339.

[8] BUCHNER, G. A., ZIMMERMANN, A. W., HOHGRÄVE, A. E. & SCHOMÄCKER, R. 2018. Techno-economic assessment framework for the chemical industry—based on technology readiness levels. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 57, 8502-8517.

[9] DAVIES, A. 2012. Handbook of condition monitoring: techniques and methodology, Springer Science & Business Media.

[10] DEAN, J. F., MIDDELBURG, J. J., RÖCKMANN, T., AERTS, R., BLAUW, L. G., EGGER, M., JETTEN, M. S., DE JONG, A. E., MEISEL, O. H. & RASIGRAF, O. 2018. Methane feedbacks to the global climate system in a warmer world. Reviews of Geophysics, 56, 207-250.

[11] DEAN, M. & TUCKER, O. 2017. A risk-based framework for Measurement, Monitoring and Verification (MMV) of the Goldeneye storage complex for the Peterhead CCS project, UK. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 61, 1-15.

[12] DUSSEAULT, M. B., JACKSON, R. E. & MACDONALD, D. 2014. Towards a road map for mitigating the rates and occurrences of long-term wellbore leakage.

[13] EL HAGGAR, S. 2010. Sustainable industrial design and waste management: cradle-to-cradle for sustainable development, Academic Press.

[14] FERREIRA, A., MARTINS, L., TEIXEIRA, S. & NUNES, M. Techno-economic assessment of micro-CHP systems. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, July 9-11 2012, 2012.

[15] GALITSKY, C. 2008. Energy efficiency improvement and cost saving opportunities for the vehicle assembly industry: an energy star guide for energy and plant managers.

[16] GANESAN, A. L., SCHWIETZKE, S., POULTER, B., ARNOLD, T., LAN, X., RIGBY, M., VOGEL, F. R., VAN DER WERF, G. R., JANSSENS‐MAENHOUT, G. & BOESCH, H. 2019. Advancing scientific understanding of the global methane budget in support of the Paris Agreement. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 33, 1475-1512.

[17] GATLAND, J. R., SANTOS, I. R., MAHER, D. T., DUNCAN, T. & ERLER, D. V. 2014. Carbon dioxide and methane emissions from an artificially drained coastal wetland during a flood: Implications for wetland global warming potential. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 119, 1698-1716.

[18] GBABO, E. Y., OKENWA, O. K. & CHIMA, P. E. Constructing AI-Enabled Compliance Automation Models for Real-Time Regulatory Reporting in Energy Systems.

[19] GBABO, E. Y., OKENWA, O. K. & CHIMA, P. E. Integrating CDM Regulations into Role-Based Compliance Models for Energy Infrastructure Projects.

[20] GCR, N. 2004. Cost analysis of inadequate interoperability in the US capital facilities industry. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 223-253.

[21] GOLSTON, L. M., AUBUT, N. F., FRISH, M. B., YANG, S., TALBOT, R. W., GRETENCORD, C., MCSPIRITT, J. & ZONDLO, M. A. 2018. Natural gas fugitive leak detection using an unmanned aerial vehicle: Localization and quantification of emission rate. Atmosphere, 9, 333.

[22] HEST, T. 2013. Factors that determine and control the Total Cost of Ownership of an ERP solution-A maturity model that increases reliable ERP cost estimation. University of Twente.

[23] HO, C. K., ITAMURA, M. T., KELLEY, M. J. & HUGHES, R. C. 2001. Review of chemical sensors for in-situ monitoring of volatile contaminants. Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States); Sandia ….

[24] HOWARTH, R. W. 2015. Methane emissions and climatic warming risk from hydraulic fracturing and shale gas development: implications for policy. Energy and Emission Control Technologies, 45-54.

[25] HOWARTH, R. W., SANTORO, R. & INGRAFFEA, A. 2012. Venting and leaking of methane from shale gas development: response to Cathles et al. Climatic Change, 113, 537-549.

[26] ISA, N. M., DAS, H. S., TAN, C. W., YATIM, A. & LAU, K. Y. 2016. A techno-economic assessment of a combined heat and power photovoltaic/fuel cell/battery energy system in Malaysia hospital. Energy, 112, 75-90.

[27] KALINA CAPDEVILA, A. 2019. Study of a preliminary value-cost model of earth observation (eo) satellites operating in very and low earth orbit (vleo/leo) for the detection of methane emission. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.

[28] KHALILI, N. R. & DUECKER, S. 2013. Application of multi-criteria decision analysis in design of sustainable environmental management system framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 188-198.

[29] KNOBELSPIES, S., BIERER, B., PEREZ, A. O., WÖLLENSTEIN, J., KNEER, J. & PALZER, S. 2016. Low-cost gas sensing system for the reliable and precise measurement of methane, carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide in natural gas and biomethane. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 236, 885-892.

[30] LAZARUS, W. F., GOODKIND, A., GALLAGHER, P. W. & CONWAY, R. K. 2011. Carbon prices required to make digesters profitable on US dairy farms of different sizes.

[31] MAJUMDAR, D., PATEL, J., BHATT, N. & DESAI, P. 2006. Emission of methane and carbon dioxide and earthworm survival during composting of pharmaceutical sludge and spent mycelia. Bioresource technology, 97, 648-658.

[32] MCHALE, L. E., MARTINEZ, B., MILLER, T. W. & YALIN, A. P. 2019. Open-path cavity ring-down methane sensor for mobile monitoring of natural gas emissions. Optics express, 27, 20084-20097.

[33] MCKERCHER, G. R., SALMOND, J. A. & VANOS, J. K. 2017. Characteristics and applications of small, portable gaseous air pollution monitors. Environmental Pollution, 223, 102-110.

[34] MILOUSI, M., SOULIOTIS, M., ARAMPATZIS, G. & PAPAEFTHIMIOU, S. 2019. Evaluating the environmental performance of solar energy systems through a combined life cycle assessment and cost analysis. Sustainability, 11, 2539.

[35] MOLNÁR, A. 2018. Leaking away the future: the role of methane emission and natural gas supply chains in global warming. Energy Policy Studies.

[36] NEUMANN, P. P., KOHLHOFF, H., HÜLLMANN, D., LILIENTHAL, A. J. & KLUGE, M. Bringing Mobile Robot Olfaction to the next dimension—UAV-based remote sensing of gas clouds and source localization. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017. IEEE, 3910-3916.

[37] OGUNNOWO, E. O. A Conceptual Framework for Digital Twin Deployment in Real-Time Monitoring of Mechanical Systems.

[38] OKUH, C. O., NWULU, E. O., OGU, E., IFECHUKWUDE, P., EGBUMOKEI, I. N. D. & DIGITEMIE, W. N. Creating a Sustainability-Focused Digital Transformation Model for Improved Environmental and Operational Outcomes in Energy Operations.

[39] OKUH, C. O., NWULU, E. O., OGU, E., IFECHUKWUDE, P., EGBUMOKEI, I. N. D. & DIGITEMIE, W. N. An Integrated Lean Six Sigma Model for Cost Optimization in Multinational Energy Operations.

[40] OLIVEIRA, M. D., MATALOTO, I. & KANAVOS, P. 2019. Multi-criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment: addressing methodological challenges to improve the state of the art. The European Journal of Health Economics, 20, 891-918.

[41] PARANHOS, E., KOZAK, T. G., BOYD, W., BRADBURY, J., STEINBERG, D. & ARENT, D. 2015. Controlling Methane Emissions in the Natural Gas Sector. A Review of Federal and State Regulatory Frameworks Governing Production, Gathering, Processing, Transmission, and Distribution.

[42] REAY, D., SMITH, P. & VAN AMSTEL, A. 2010. Methane sources and the global methane budget. Methane and climate change. Routledge.

[43] ROBINSON, J., LEVACK, D., RHODES, R. & CHEN, T. Need for technology maturity of any advanced capability to achieve better life cycle cost. 45th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, 2009. 5347.

[44] SHAFIEE, M., ANIMAH, I. & SIMMS, N. 2016. Development of a techno-economic framework for life extension decision making of safety critical installations. Journal of loss prevention in the process Industries, 44, 299-310.

[45] SHINDELL, D., FUGLESTVEDT, J. & COLLINS, W. 2017. The social cost of methane: theory and applications. Faraday Discussions, 200, 429-451.

[46] SI, J., MARJANOVIC-HALBURD, L., NASIRI, F. & BELL, S. 2016. Assessment of building-integrated green technologies: A review and case study on applications of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) method. Sustainable cities and society, 27, 106-115.

[47] SIEBENALER, S. P., JANKA, A. M., LYON, D., EDLEBECK, J. P. & NOWLAN, A. E. Methane detectors challenge: Low-cost continuous emissions monitoring. International Pipeline Conference, 2016. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, V003T04A013.

[48] SOLTANI, A., HEWAGE, K., REZA, B. & SADIQ, R. 2015. Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: a review. Waste Management, 35, 318-328.

[49] TIWARI, D. N. 2000. Sustainability criteria and cost–benefit analysis: an analytical framework for environmental–economic decision making at the project level. Environment and Development Economics, 5, 259-288.

[50] TIWARI, D. N., LOOF, R. & PAUDYAL, G. N. 1999. Environmental–economic decision-making in lowland irrigated agriculture using multi-criteria analysis techniques. Agricultural systems, 60, 99-112.

[51] TOMEI, M. C., BERTANZA, G., CANATO, M., HEIMERSSON, S., LAERA, G. & SVANSTRÖM, M. 2016. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of upgrading alternatives for sludge stabilization in municipal wastewater treatment plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3106-3115.

[52] VAN DAEL, M., KUPPENS, T., LIZIN, S. & VAN PASSEL, S. 2014. Techno-economic assessment methodology for ultrasonic production of biofuels. Production of biofuels and chemicals with ultrasound. Springer.

[53] VAN NIJEN, K., VAN PASSEL, S. & SQUIRES, D. 2018. A stochastic techno-economic assessment of seabed mining of polymetallic nodules in the Clarion Clipperton Fracture Zone. Marine Policy, 95, 133-141.

[54] VENTRELLA, J. & MACCARTY, N. 2019. Monitoring impacts of clean cookstoves and fuels with the Fuel Use Electronic Logger (FUEL): Results of pilot testing. Energy for Sustainable Development, 52, 82-95.

[55] WEN, Z., HU, S., DE CLERCQ, D., BECK, M. B., ZHANG, H., ZHANG, H., FEI, F. & LIU, J. 2018. Design, implementation, and evaluation of an Internet of Things (IoT) network system for restaurant food waste management. Waste management, 73, 26-38.

[56] WHITE, C. M., SMITH, D. H., JONES, K. L., GOODMAN, A. L., JIKICH, S. A., LACOUNT, R. B., DUBOSE, S. B., OZDEMIR, E., MORSI, B. I. & SCHROEDER, K. T. 2005. Sequestration of carbon dioxide in coal with enhanced coalbed methane recovery a review. Energy & Fuels, 19, 659-724.

[57] WHITING, G. J. & CHANTON, J. P. 2001. Greenhouse carbon balance of wetlands: methane emission versus carbon sequestration. Tellus B, 53, 521-528.

[58] WILSON, A. D. 2012. Review of electronic-nose technologies and algorithms to detect hazardous chemicals in the environment. Procedia Technology, 1, 453-463.

@article{1709945,
      author = {Semiu Temidayo Fasasi, Oluwapelumi Joseph Adebowale, Abdulmaliq Abdulsalam, Zamathula Queen Sikhakhane Nwokediegwu},
      title = {A Techno-Economic Model of Continuous Versus Intermittent Methane Monitoring Programs},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2019},
      volume = {2},
      number = {7},
      pages = {164-173},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1709945.pdf},
      abstract = {Methane emissions from industrial and natural sources pose significant environmental challenges due to their high global warming potential. Effective monitoring is essential for timely leak detection and mitigation, yet monitoring programs vary widely in their technical approaches and economic implications. This paper presents a comprehensive techno-economic model that systematically compares continuous and intermittent methane monitoring strategies. The model integrates key technical parameters, such as detection sensitivity, monitoring frequency, and response time, with economic factors including capital expenditures, operational costs, and potential savings from emission reductions. Results highlight critical trade-offs between upfront investments and detection effectiveness, demonstrating that continuous monitoring provides superior leak detection and environmental benefits but at higher costs, whereas intermittent monitoring offers lower initial expenses with potential delays in leak identification. The model's flexibility allows adaptation across diverse operational contexts, supporting tailored decision-making for methane mitigation investments. By bridging technical and economic considerations, this framework informs both industry stakeholders and policymakers on optimizing methane monitoring programs to balance environmental goals with financial feasibility. Future research directions include incorporating dynamic emission profiles and emerging technologies to enhance model precision and applicability.},
      keywords = {Methane monitoring, Techno-economic model, Continuous monitoring, Intermittent monitoring, Emission detection, Cost-effectiveness},
      month = {January},
  }