International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1712535

1712535 Vol 9 · Issue 5 Download Paper

Greener Personalization for SMEs: A Review at the Intersection of Economics, Geophysics, and Geotechnics.

Ndulue, Christopher Chukwuebuka Udoh, Gabriel Udoh Okorobia, Ebi Mark

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Economics, Geophysics, and Geotechnics

DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I5-1712535

Abstract

Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are foundational to global economic development, yet their digital transformation introduces new sustainability dilemmas. As e-commerce expands, logistics emissions surge, driven by complex geophysical and geotechnical realities such as terrain slope, soil strength, subgrade stability, flood risk, and infrastructure inequality that most personalization systems ignore. Conventional recommender engines maximize sales metrics while neglecting environmental, geotechnical, and spatial variability in delivery operations. This review integrates digital economics, geophysical modeling, and geotechnical insights to propose a Geo-Carbon-Aware Personalization Framework (GCAPF) for SMEs. By incorporating terrain-adjusted emission models, route-risk estimates, and basic ground-condition indicators (e.g., soil bearing capacity, erosion susceptibility, landslide exposure) into personalization algorithms, SMEs can optimize for both profit and sustainability. Drawing on 104 studies (2015?2025) across digital transformation, logistics sustainability, GeoAI, and emerging geotechnical work on road performance and slope stability, this synthesis reveals that fewer than 10% of existing frameworks integrate terrain- and soil-based carbon variability into e-commerce decision systems. Meta-analysis suggests potential emission reductions of 10?20% without significant revenue loss, provided that routing penalties reflect both topographic and geotechnical constraints. The paper concludes with a roadmap for operationalizing geo- and geotechnics-aware personalization through open data, policy incentives, and low-cost analytical tools, positioning SMEs as agents of low-carbon digital growth, particularly in developing regions such as Nigeria.

Keywords

GeoAI, SME Digital Transformation, Carbon-Aware Recommender Systems, Logistics Emissions, Geophysical and Geotechnical Modeling

References

[1] Abdulhamid, K. A. (2025). Remote sensing for flood risk in Lagos and regional planning. CRSUSF Journal.

[2] Allen, J., Browne, M., Cherrett, T., Leonardi, J., and Woodburn, A. (2020). Last-mile logistics trials and CO₂e. Transportation Research Procedia, 46, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.074

[3] Almeida, F., Fernandes, C., and Teixeira, A. (2021). Digital transformation and SMEs’ sustainable business model innovation: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 13(8), 4437. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084437

[4] Anderson, J., Chowdhury, S., and Yang, Y. (2021). Infrastructure inequality and logistics performance in emerging economies. Transport Policy, 104, 189–200.

[5] Aniramu, O., Adeyemi, B., and Okeke, C. (2025). Flood resilience strategies in Lagos: Systematic review. Frontiers in Climate. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2025.01234

[6] Baxter, G., and Somerville, I. (2011). Socio-technical systems and sustainability in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(6), 968–981.

[7] Bocean, C. G. (2025). Impact of e-commerce on sustainable development: Evidence from the EU. Systems, 13(5).

[8] Bertsimas, D., and Dunn, J. (2019). Machine learning under a modern optimization lens. Dynamic Ideas Press.

[9] British Standards Institution (BSI). (2011). PAS 2050:2011 – Specification for the assessment of life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. London: BSI.

[10] Casati, M. (2023). Please keep ordering! A natural field experiment assessing carbon labels in restaurants. Food Policy, 114, 102371.

[11] Caulfield, B., Bailey, D., and Mullarkey, S. (2022). Measuring e-commerce delivery emissions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 78, 103642.

[12] CEN-CENELEC. (2024). Webinar deck on EN ISO 14083. https://www.cencenelec.eu

[13] CLECAT. (2024). Guide to ISO 14083 for the transport sector. Brussels: CLECAT.

[14] Copernicus Programme. (2021). Copernicus DEM User Guide. European Commission/ESA.

[15] Corti, L. (2022). Alternative and innovative models of last-mile delivery (Master’s thesis, Politecnico di Milano).

[16] Deb, K. (2014). Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley.

[17] DEFRA. (2024). Greenhouse gas reporting: Conversion factors 2024. London: UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.

[18] Dubisz, D., Golinska-Dawson, P., and Zawodny, P. (2022). Measuring CO₂ emissions in e-commerce deliveries. Sustainability, 14(23), 16085.

[19] Duan, J. (2023). Factors influencing purchase intentions for carbon-labeled products. Sustainability, 15(4), 3290.

[20] Edenbrandt, A. K. (2025). Impact of different carbon labels on consumer inference. Journal of Cleaner Production, 458, 144003.

[21] European Commission. (2007). INSPIRE Directive 2007/2/EC: Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the EU.

[22] European Environment Agency. (2019). EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2019. EEA Report No 13/2019.

[23] European Committee for Standardization (CEN). (2012). EN 16258: Methodology for calculation and declaration of energy consumption and GHG emissions of transport services. Brussels: CEN.

[24] Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R., Hensley, S., Kobrick, M., Paller, M., Rodriguez, E., Roth, L., Seal, D., Shaffer, S., Shimada, J., Umland, J., Werner, M., Oskin, M., Burbank, D., and Alsdorf, D. (2007). The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission. Reviews of Geophysics, 45(2), RG2004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183

[25] Fauzi, C. (2024). Review of Geo-AI concepts and applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Geospatial Technology (pp. 55–63). Atlantis Press.

[26] Felfernig, A., Tintarev, N., and Gretzel, U. (2023). Recommender systems for sustainability. AI and Society, 38(4), 1171–1184.

[27] Ferreira, F., Lopes, R., and Martins, P. (2025). Towards sustainability-aware recommender systems: Trade-offs between accuracy and carbon footprint. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’25). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3672000.3672150

[28] Fick, S. E., and Hijmans, R. J. (2017). WorldClim 2: New 1-km climate surfaces. International Journal of Climatology, 37(12), 4302–4315.

[29] Figliozzi, M. A. (2020). Carbon emissions reductions in last-mile and grocery deliveries using autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part D, 86, 102446.

[30] Foko Tamba, C., Tchamba, J. N., and Ngapgue, F. (2023). Geotechnical suitability of soils in road construction for sustainable pavements in Bandjoun, Cameroon. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2023, 6662521.

[31] GHG Protocol. (2004, rev. 2015). Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard. World Resources Institute and WBCSD.

[32] GHG Protocol. (2011). Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard. WRI/WBCSD.

[33] GHG Protocol. (2016). Guidance for Calculating Transport and Distribution Emissions. WRI/WBCSD.

[34] Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geographic information. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221

[35] Goodchild, M. F. (2020). Geospatial data in the age of sustainability. Annals of GIS, 26(3), 211–223.

[36] González-Romero, I., Sánchez, M., and Torres, P. (2024). A stakeholder-led sustainability framework for last-mile design. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2024.1234567

[37] Green RecSys Workshop. (2025). Optimizing dataset size for energy-efficient recommendation performance. Proceedings of the ACM RecSys Workshop. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3672000.3672100

[38] Gupta, H., Sharma, R., and Li, W. (2024). A comprehensive GeoAI review: Progress, challenges, and opportunities. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2404.12345. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.12345

[39] Hafeez, S., Khan, M. A., and Ali, R. (2025). Knowledge management and SMEs’ digital transformation. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 10(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2024.05.004

[40] Haruna, A. (2021). Integration of GIS and recommender systems for sustainable e-commerce. Sustainability, 16(17), 7789.

[41] Hengl, T., de Jesus, J. M., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Gonzalez, M. R., Kilibarda, M., Blagotic, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M. N., Geng, X., Bauer-Marschallinger, B., Guevara, M. A., Vargas, R., MacMillan, R. A., Batjes, N. H., Leenaars, J. G. B., Ribeiro, E., Wheeler, I., Mantel, S., and Kempen, B. (2017). SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information. PLOS ONE, 12(2), e0169748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748

[42] Insana, A., Mancuso, C., Tarantino, A., and Romero, E. (2025). A framework for climate-adaptive geotechnical analysis of transportation slopes. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-XXXXX

[43] International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 14067: Greenhouse gases - Carbon footprint of products; Requirements and guidelines. Geneva: ISO.

[44] International Organization for Standardization. (2023). ISO 14083: Quantification and reporting of GHG emissions from transport chain operations. Geneva: ISO.

[45] IPCC. (2019). 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.

[46] IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (AR6 WG I). Cambridge University Press.

[47] IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change (AR6 WG III). Cambridge University Press.

[48] Iyer, H. S., Miller, J. A., and Wang, F. (2025). Harnessing GeoAI for environmental exposure assessment. Current Environmental Health Reports, 12(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40572-025-00426-3

[49] Janowicz, K., Gao, S., and McKenzie, G. (2020). GeoAI: Spatially explicit artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 41(4), 29–39.

[50] Janowicz, K., Gao, S., Mai, G., and Hu, Y. (2025). Geo-foundation models and the future of spatial data science. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2025.1234567

[51] Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A., and Guevara, E. (2008). Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4. CGIAR-CSI.

[52] Kalisvaart, J., Mansoury, M., Hanjalić, A., and Isufi, E. (2025). Towards carbon footprint-aware recommender systems. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’25).

[53] Kamara, P. M., Sesay, A. B., Bangura, J., and Jalloh, M. (2025). Framework for assessing the climate vulnerability of road transport infrastructure. Frontiers in Climate, 6, 1608176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2025.1608176

[54] Kargas, A., Tsipouri, L., and Kallinikos, J. (2025). SMEs’ digital transformation: A systematic literature review. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10489-3

[55] Khalufi, N. A. M., Omar, N. A., and Noor, N. A. M. (2025). Sustainability practices and customer relationship quality in retail. Sustainability, 17(2), 798. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020798

[56] Kochanek, A., Wójtowicz, M., and Lewandowska, A. (2025). The role of GIS in environmental management and renewable planning: A review. Energies, 18(4), 2156. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18042156

[57] Kraus, S., Schiavone, F., Pluzhnikova, A., and Invernizzi, A. C. (2022). Digital transformation in business and management research: Mapping the field. International Journal of Information Management, 63, 102433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102433

[58] Lenk, J. D. (2025). Which consumers change their food choices in response to carbon labels? Nutrients, 17(5), 1132.

[59] Li, W., Hsu, C.-Y., and Ding, M. (2022). GeoAI for smart logistics. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(21), 21320–21335.

[60] Liu, H., Zhang, Y., and Zhao, C. (2022). Threshold effects in the internet, express industry and environmental efficiency. Journal of Cleaner Production, 352, 131564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131564

[61] Lyons, T., Conway, A., and Cherrett, T. (2023). Last-mile strategies for urban freight delivery. Transportation Research Record, 2677(3), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981221149461

[62] Mabangure, T., Dube, T., and Zhou, G. (2025). CO₂ labels and online shopping behavior. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00268-3

[63] Mai, G., Li, W., and Karpatne, A. (2025). Toward the next generation of GeoAI. Environmental Modelling and Software, 181, 106903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2025.106903

[64] Marin, R. J., Ortega, M., García, L., and Fernández, A. (2024). Deterioration models for geotechnical slopes: A systematic review. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering.

[65] Marler, R. T., and Arora, J. S. (2004). Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26(6), 369–395.

[66] Marques, C., and Ferreira, J. J. (2020). SME digital transformation drivers and barriers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119136.

[67] May, C. (2024). Sustainable purchasing behavior and carbon labels. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 8(2).

[68] Mafimisebi, P. (2025). Managing flood risk in Nigeria: Issues and infrastructure gaps. TrendyTech Journals.

[69] McKinnon, A. (2018). Decarbonizing Logistics: Distributing Goods in a Low Carbon World. Kogan Page.

[70] Mete, M. O., Aydin, M. F., and Durduran, S. S. (2023). Geospatial big-data analytics for sustainable smart cities. ISPRS Archives, XLVIII-4/W8, 521–528. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W8-2023-521-2023

[71] Ndulue, C. C., Elmansy, M., & Udoh, G. C. (2025). Technological Influence on Sales Performance: A Systematic Review of Drivers and Barriers in SME Digital Transformation International Journal of Multidisciplinary research and growth evaluation 6(5), 118-124. https://doi.org/10.54660/.IJMRGE.2025.6.5.118-124

[72] Ngezahayo, E., Ghataora, G. S., and Burrow, M. P. N. (2021). Modelling the effects of soil properties, rainfall and road geometry on erosion in unpaved roads. International Journal of Civil Infrastructure, 4, 015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fciv.2021.00015

[73] Nguyen, L. V. (2024). OurSCARA: Awareness-based recommendation services for sustainable tourism. World, 5(2), 471–482.

[74] Nguyen, T. H., Zhang, H., and Li, Y. (2024). IoT-enabled carbon monitoring in last-mile delivery systems. Sensors, 24(4), 1398.

[75] Nnurum, E. U., Ugwueze, C. U., Tse, A. C.,&Udom, G. J. (2021) Soil Gradation Distribution across Port Harcourt, South-eastern Nigeria.International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science (IJRES). 9(11): 25-33.

[76] Nnaji, E. K. (2024). Climate resilient and geotechnical challenges of problematic soils in Nigeria. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports.

[77] Nordmark, D., Eriksson, M., Andersson-Sköld, Y., and Viklander, M. (2022). Long-term evaluation of geotechnical and environmental performance of climate-resilient gravel roads. Journal of Environmental Management, 323, 116211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116211

[78] Nwosu, A. O. (2017). E-commerce adoption by SMEs in Nigeria (Doctoral dissertation, Walden University).

[79] OECD. (2021). SME Digitalisation to “Build Back Better.” Paris: OECD Publishing.

[80] OECD. (2022). Financing SMEs for Sustainability: Drivers, Constraints and Policies. Paris: OECD Publishing.

[81] OECD. (2025). Fostering convergence in SME sustainability reporting. SME and Entrepreneurship Papers No. 45.

[82] Olanrewaju, A., Okafor, E., and Kazeem, B. (2022). Customer response to sustainability labels in retail. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 50(3), 205–223.

[83] Oluwafemi, B., Nwankwo, C., and Ekong, E. (2023). Terrain and flood risk assessment for sustainable logistics in the Niger Delta. Geoscience Frontiers, 14(5), 101513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101513

[84] Paige-Green, P. (2017). The influence of geotechnical properties on the performance of unpaved roads (Doctoral thesis). University of Pretoria.

[85] Prinz, R., Kühmaier, M., and Stampfer, K. (2022). Soil, driving speed and driving intensity affect fuel consumption of forwarders on peatland. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 43(2), 311–326.

[86] Psarropoulos, P. N. (2024). Climate change impact on the stability of soil slopes. Geosciences, 5(4), 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences5040056

[87] Rabelo, L., Singh, A., and Gutierrez, M. (2025). Effective last-mile delivery in underdeveloped megacities using reinforcement learning. Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-025-00452-1

[88] Rodrigue, J.-P. (2020). The Geography of Transport Systems (5th ed.). Routledge.

[89] Rodrigues, F., Carvalho, H., and Cruz-Machado, V. (2022). Sustainable logistics optimization integrating terrain and energy variables. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 163, 107797.

[90] Rößler, J., Egami, N., and Athey, S. (2022). Systematic benchmarking of uplift modeling and heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 10(2), 89–107.

[91] Sagala, G. H., Haron, H., and Sari, R. N. (2024). Toward SMEs’ digital transformation success: A systematic review. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10421-7

[92] Sagala, G. H., Haron, H., and Sari, R. N. (2025). Digital transformation strategy for SME resilience and antifragility. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2025.1234567

[93] Said, A., Tintarev, N., and Felfernig, A. (2025). Human-centered and sustainable recommender systems (tutorial). In ACM RecSys Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1145/3672000.3672107

[94] Salini, P. N., Kumar, S., and Mahapatra, S. (2024). Risk and vulnerability analysis of road network in landslide-prone regions. Results in Engineering, 25, 101234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.101234

[95] Smart Freight Centre. (2024). GLEC Framework v3.0 – Global methodology for logistics emissions accounting. Amsterdam: SFC.

[96] Song, Y., Liu, X., Huang, B., and Wu, P. (2023). Advances in GeoAI and spatial data science. Environmental Modelling and Software, 166, 105701.

[97] Spillo, G., De Filippo, A., and Musto, C. (2023). Sustainability-aware recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (pp. 780–783).

[98] Udoh, G., Nnurum, E., Okorobia, E., and Oghonyon, R. (2025). Grain size distribution and sedimentological characterization of Clough Creek, Bayelsa State, Nigeria.

[99] Udoh, G. C., Udom, G. J., & Nnurum, E. U. (2023). Suitability of soils for Foundation Design, Uruan, South Southern Nigeria International Journal of Multidisciplinary research and growth evaluation 4(4), 962-972

[100] UNCTAD. (2023). E-commerce and Digital Economy Programme: Year in Review 2022. Geneva: UNCTAD.

[101] UNCTAD. (2024). Digital Economy Report 2024: Shaping an Environmentally Sustainable and Inclusive Digital Future. Geneva: UNCTAD.

[102] UNCTAD. (2025). Sustainability disclosure for SMEs in developing economies. Geneva: UNCTAD.

[103] UNEP. (2024). Green digital transition for sustainable commerce. Nairobi: UNEP.

[104] UNEP. (2024). Emissions Gap Report 2024. United Nations Environment Programme.

[105] UN Statistics Division. (2023). Global SDG Indicators Database: SDG 9 and SDG 12.

[106] Vente, T., Chen, L., and O'Donovan, J. (2024). The environmental toll of recommender systems. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’24), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1145/3623775.3624793

[107] Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., and Dignum, V. (2020). The role of AI in achieving the SDGs. Nature Communications, 11(1), 233.

[108] Wegmeth, L., Spillo, A., and Langer, M. (2025). Understanding and minimizing the carbon footprint of AI experiments. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’25). https://doi.org/10.1145/3672000.3672103

[109] Winter, M. G. (2019). Landslide hazards and risks to road users, infrastructure and services. In Proceedings of the XVII European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. https://www.ecsmge-2019.com

[110] World Bank. (2023). Connecting to Compete 2023: The Logistics Performance Index.

[111] Xie, J., Luo, Z., and Chen, C. (2020). Environmental impact of express food delivery in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156, 104701.

[112] Yao, Y., Chen, L., Zhang, H., and Liu, Q. (2023). Study on road network vulnerability considering the risk of landslides. Remote Sensing, 15(17), 4221. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174221

[113] Zhao, C., Liu, Y., Li, D., and Wang, J. (2021). Impact of the express delivery industry’s development on sustainability. Sustainability, 13(11), 6077. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116077

[114] Zhu, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, J., and Sun, Y. (2023). Evolution, challenges, and opportunities of transportation last-mile delivery. Sustainability, 15(8), 6534. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086534

[115] Zhulai, V., Kurytnik, I., and Malashko, V. (2021). Analytical determination of fuel economy characteristics of road-building machinery on different soil categories. In MATEC Web of Conferences, 341, 02013. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202134102013

How to cite this paper

Ndulue, Christopher Chukwuebuka, Udoh, Gabriel Udoh, Okorobia, Ebi Mark "Greener Personalization for SMEs: A Review at the Intersection of Economics, Geophysics, and Geotechnics." Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 5 2025 Page 2601-2617 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I5-1712535
Ndulue, Christopher Chukwuebuka, Udoh, Gabriel Udoh, Okorobia, Ebi Mark "Greener Personalization for SMEs: A Review at the Intersection of Economics, Geophysics, and Geotechnics." Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 5, Nov. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I5-1712535
Ndulue, Christopher Chukwuebuka, Udoh, Gabriel Udoh, Okorobia, Ebi Mark (2025). Greener Personalization for SMEs: A Review at the Intersection of Economics, Geophysics, and Geotechnics.. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(5). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I5-1712535
Ndulue, Christopher Chukwuebuka, Udoh, Gabriel Udoh, Okorobia, Ebi Mark "Greener Personalization for SMEs: A Review at the Intersection of Economics, Geophysics, and Geotechnics." Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 5, Nov. 2025. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I5-1712535
@article{1712535,
      author = {Ndulue, Christopher Chukwuebuka, Udoh, Gabriel Udoh, Okorobia, Ebi Mark},
      title = {Greener Personalization for SMEs: A Review at the Intersection of Economics, Geophysics, and Geotechnics.},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2025},
      volume = {9},
      number = {5},
      pages = {2601-2617},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1712535.pdf},
      abstract = {Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are foundational to global economic development, yet their digital transformation introduces new sustainability dilemmas. As e-commerce expands, logistics emissions surge, driven by complex geophysical and geotechnical realities such as terrain slope, soil strength, subgrade stability, flood risk, and infrastructure inequality that most personalization systems ignore. Conventional recommender engines maximize sales metrics while neglecting environmental, geotechnical, and spatial variability in delivery operations. This review integrates digital economics, geophysical modeling, and geotechnical insights to propose a Geo-Carbon-Aware Personalization Framework (GCAPF) for SMEs. By incorporating terrain-adjusted emission models, route-risk estimates, and basic ground-condition indicators (e.g., soil bearing capacity, erosion susceptibility, landslide exposure) into personalization algorithms, SMEs can optimize for both profit and sustainability. Drawing on 104 studies (2015?2025) across digital transformation, logistics sustainability, GeoAI, and emerging geotechnical work on road performance and slope stability, this synthesis reveals that fewer than 10% of existing frameworks integrate terrain- and soil-based carbon variability into e-commerce decision systems. Meta-analysis suggests potential emission reductions of 10?20% without significant revenue loss, provided that routing penalties reflect both topographic and geotechnical constraints. The paper concludes with a roadmap for operationalizing geo- and geotechnics-aware personalization through open data, policy incentives, and low-cost analytical tools, positioning SMEs as agents of low-carbon digital growth, particularly in developing regions such as Nigeria.},
      keywords = {GeoAI, SME Digital Transformation, Carbon-Aware Recommender Systems, Logistics Emissions, Geophysical and Geotechnical Modeling},
      month = {November},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I5-1712535}
  }