International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1719878

1719878 Vol 10 · Issue 1 Download Paper

From Load Profiling to Resilient Solar Availability: An Engineering Management Framework for Optimizing Distributed PV Systems in U.S. Facilities

Godsave Archford Sajanga Gladman Nhamoinesu Machekera Patronella Siphatisiwe Mtemeli Malvern Munashe Dongo Munashe Naphtali Mupa

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Engineering and Technology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719878

Abstract

Distributed photovoltaic (PV) systems have become central to decarbonisation, facility resilience, and electricity-cost management in the United States. Yet many facility-scale installations underperform because design decisions are made around nominal capacity rather than operational load shape, inverter availability, thermal behaviour, commissioning quality, maintenance discipline, and lifecycle risk. This paper develops an engineering-management framework that links load profiling, component selection, commissioning protocols, preventive maintenance, performance validation, documentation, and lifecycle cost-risk analysis into a single operating model for resilient solar availability in U.S. facilities. The paper uses secondary data from the Kaggle Solar Power Generation Data dataset, which contains inverter-level PV generation and weather-sensor data collected at two solar plants over a 34-day period, and triangulates those data with published PV reliability, O&M, and performance literature. The analysis shows that PV availability is not merely a generation problem; it is a management-system problem involving demand forecasting, conversion efficiency, module-temperature exposure, inverter variation, sensor quality, maintenance scheduling, and evidence-based documentation. The Kaggle-based evidence indicates that daily yield may appear similar across plants while DC-to-AC conversion performance, cumulative yield, and maintenance-event signatures differ materially. Published analysis of the same dataset reports mean daily yields of approximately 3,295.97 kWh and 3,294.89 kWh for Plants 1 and 2, respectively, while also identifying strong correlations between module temperature and ambient temperature, and between module temperature and irradiation. The proposed framework converts these findings into a practical facility protocol: profile the load before sizing, select components against operating conditions, commission against measurable acceptance criteria, maintain based on risk and performance evidence, validate availability continuously, and document lifecycle decisions for auditability. The study contributes an applied model for engineers, facility managers, energy consultants, and public-interest energy practitioners seeking to improve solar reliability, resilience, and return on investment in distributed PV systems.

Keywords

Distributed Photovoltaic Systems, Load Profiling, Solar PV Availability, Preventive Maintenance, Commissioning; Engineering Management, Energy Resilience, Lifecycle Cost-Risk Analysis, Facility Energy Optimization

References

[1] AICPA and CIMA (2025) 2025 Trends Report. Available at: https://www.aicpa-cima.com/professional-insights/download/2025-trends-report (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[2] DOE (2022) Understanding Solar Photovoltaic System Performance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy. Available at: https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2022-02/understanding-solar-photo-voltaic-system-performance.pdf (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[3] EIA (2026a) Wind and solar generated a record 17% of U.S. electricity in 2025. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Today in Energy, 20 March. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=67367 (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[4] EIA (2026b) New U.S. electric generating capacity expected to reach a record high in 2026. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Today in Energy, 20 February. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=67205 (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[5] Fujita, K.S., Ancona, Z.H., Kramer, L.A., Straka, M., Gautreau, T.E., Garrity, C.P., Robson, D., Diffendorfer, J.E. and Hoen, B. (2026) United States Large-Scale Solar Photovoltaic Database (v4.0, April 2026). U.S. Geological Survey and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5066/P9IA3TUS (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[6] IEA (2024) Solar PV. International Energy Agency. Available at: https://www.iea.org/energy-system/renewables/solar-pv (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[7] IEA (2024) Renewables 2024: Analysis and Forecast to 2030. Paris: International Energy Agency. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2024 (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[8] IEA PVPS (2024) Trends in Photovoltaic Applications 2024. International Energy Agency Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme. Available at: https://iea-pvps.org/trends_reports/trends-in-pv-applications-2024/ (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[9] IEA PVPS (2026) Performance, Operation and Reliability of Photovoltaic Systems: Task 13. Available at: https://iea-pvps.org/research-tasks/performance-operation-and-reliability-of-photovoltaic-systems/ (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[10] Kannal, A. (2020) Solar Power Generation Data. Kaggle Dataset. Available at: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/anikannal/solar-power-generation-data (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[11] Klise, G.T., Stein, J.S. and Riley, D. (2017) PV System Availability as a Reliability Metric. Sandia National Laboratories. Available at: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1372599 (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[12] Li, B. et al. (2024) Real-Time Solar Power Generation Scheduling for Maintenance and Suboptimally Performing Equipment Using Demand Response Unified with Model Predictive Control, Energies, 17(13), 3212. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17133212 (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[13] Lin, Z. et al. (2025) A high-resolution three-year dataset supporting rooftop photovoltaic generation research, Scientific Data. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41597-025-04397-y (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[14] Mathe, J., Miolane, N., Sebastien, N. and Lequeux, J. (2019) PVNet: A LRCN Architecture for Spatio-Temporal Photovoltaic Power Forecasting from Numerical Weather Prediction. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.01453 (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[15] Mupa, M.N. et al. (2025) Renewable Energy Integration and Smart Grid Optimization Using Mechatronics and Artificial Intelligence. ResearchGate. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Munashe-Naphtali-Mupa/research (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[16] Mupa, M.N. et al. (2025) Optimising P2P Energy Trading Using Internet of Things and Agentic AI Cluster Zooming. ResearchGate. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Munashe-Naphtali-Mupa/research (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[17] NREL, Sandia National Laboratories, SunSpec Alliance and SuNLaMP PV O&M Best Practices Working Group (2018) Best Practices for Operation and Maintenance of Photovoltaic and Energy Storage Systems. 3rd edn. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy19osti/73822.pdf (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[18] Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2026) Solar Photovoltaic: Operations and Maintenance Best Practices. Available at: https://www.pnnl.gov/projects/om-best-practices/solar-photovoltaic (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[19] Perera, M., De Hoog, J., Bandara, K. and Halgamuge, S. (2024) Day-ahead regional solar power forecasting with hierarchical temporal convolutional neural networks using historical power generation and weather data. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.01653 (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[20] Rizk-Allah, R.M. et al. (2024) Explainable AI and optimized solar power generation prediction using machine learning techniques, PLOS ONE. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11446449/ (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[21] Sonawane, P.R. et al. (2023) Reliability and Criticality Analysis of a Large-Scale Solar Photovoltaic System Using Fault Tree Analysis Approach, Sustainability, 15(5), 4609. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054609 (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[22] Torres Navarro, R. (2025) Reliability, availability and maintainability analysis for grid-connected photovoltaic systems, Renewable Energy and Sustainability. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/27533735251347993 (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

[23] Walker, H.A. et al. (2018) Best Practices for Operation and Maintenance of Photovoltaic and Energy Storage Systems; 3rd Edition. OSTI Technical Report. Available at: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1489002 (Accessed: 20 June 2026).

How to cite this paper

Godsave Archford Sajanga, Gladman Nhamoinesu Machekera, Patronella Siphatisiwe Mtemeli, Malvern Munashe Dongo, Munashe Naphtali Mupa "From Load Profiling to Resilient Solar Availability: An Engineering Management Framework for Optimizing Distributed PV Systems in U.S. Facilities" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 1 2026 Page 2688-2703 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719878
Godsave Archford Sajanga, Gladman Nhamoinesu Machekera, Patronella Siphatisiwe Mtemeli, Malvern Munashe Dongo, Munashe Naphtali Mupa "From Load Profiling to Resilient Solar Availability: An Engineering Management Framework for Optimizing Distributed PV Systems in U.S. Facilities" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 1, Jul. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719878
Godsave Archford Sajanga, Gladman Nhamoinesu Machekera, Patronella Siphatisiwe Mtemeli, Malvern Munashe Dongo, Munashe Naphtali Mupa (2026). From Load Profiling to Resilient Solar Availability: An Engineering Management Framework for Optimizing Distributed PV Systems in U.S. Facilities. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719878
Godsave Archford Sajanga, Gladman Nhamoinesu Machekera, Patronella Siphatisiwe Mtemeli, Malvern Munashe Dongo, Munashe Naphtali Mupa "From Load Profiling to Resilient Solar Availability: An Engineering Management Framework for Optimizing Distributed PV Systems in U.S. Facilities" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 1, Jul. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719878
@article{1719878,
      author = {Godsave Archford Sajanga, Gladman Nhamoinesu Machekera, Patronella Siphatisiwe Mtemeli, Malvern Munashe Dongo, Munashe Naphtali Mupa},
      title = {From Load Profiling to Resilient Solar Availability: An Engineering Management Framework for Optimizing Distributed PV Systems in U.S. Facilities},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {1},
      pages = {2688-2703},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1719878.pdf},
      abstract = {Distributed photovoltaic (PV) systems have become central to decarbonisation, facility resilience, and electricity-cost management in the United States. Yet many facility-scale installations underperform because design decisions are made around nominal capacity rather than operational load shape, inverter availability, thermal behaviour, commissioning quality, maintenance discipline, and lifecycle risk. This paper develops an engineering-management framework that links load profiling, component selection, commissioning protocols, preventive maintenance, performance validation, documentation, and lifecycle cost-risk analysis into a single operating model for resilient solar availability in U.S. facilities. The paper uses secondary data from the Kaggle Solar Power Generation Data dataset, which contains inverter-level PV generation and weather-sensor data collected at two solar plants over a 34-day period, and triangulates those data with published PV reliability, O&M, and performance literature. The analysis shows that PV availability is not merely a generation problem; it is a management-system problem involving demand forecasting, conversion efficiency, module-temperature exposure, inverter variation, sensor quality, maintenance scheduling, and evidence-based documentation. The Kaggle-based evidence indicates that daily yield may appear similar across plants while DC-to-AC conversion performance, cumulative yield, and maintenance-event signatures differ materially. Published analysis of the same dataset reports mean daily yields of approximately 3,295.97 kWh and 3,294.89 kWh for Plants 1 and 2, respectively, while also identifying strong correlations between module temperature and ambient temperature, and between module temperature and irradiation. The proposed framework converts these findings into a practical facility protocol: profile the load before sizing, select components against operating conditions, commission against measurable acceptance criteria, maintain based on risk and performance evidence, validate availability continuously, and document lifecycle decisions for auditability. The study contributes an applied model for engineers, facility managers, energy consultants, and public-interest energy practitioners seeking to improve solar reliability, resilience, and return on investment in distributed PV systems.},
      keywords = {Distributed Photovoltaic Systems, Load Profiling, Solar PV Availability, Preventive Maintenance, Commissioning; Engineering Management, Energy Resilience, Lifecycle Cost-Risk Analysis, Facility Energy Optimization},
      month = {July},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I1-1719878}
  }