Home / Current Issue / Paper 1722180
Geotechnical and Geophysical Investigation for The Federal University of Technology Akure (FUTA) Waste Containment Facility
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Mineral and Manufacturing Engineering
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722180
Abstract
This research focuses on investigation of geological and geotechnical information that will aid the construction of the proposed FUTA waste containment facility (landfill) before the design, development, and construction due to non or inaccurately conducted geological and geotechnical investigation of selected land area used for solid waste disposal. The proposed landfill site is 4,795 m2 of FUTA municipal solid waste. Evaluation of the suitability for the construction of an engineered landfill was determined with geological, geophysical and geotechnical investigation. Geological test was carried out using previous study of the area. The geophysical investigation of Vertical Electrical Sounding and Electrical Resistivity Sounding method were carried out. Disturbed samples were taken at depths of 0.5 and 1.0m respectively with moisture content ranging from 14.20% to 23.40% for 0 – 0.5m depths, 16.20% to 20.40% for 0.5 to 1.0m, specific gravity. The Plastic Index (PI) for samples at depth 0.0-0.5m ranges from 10.9% to 13.2 while the Plastic Index (PI) for samples at depth 0.5-1.0m ranges from 11.1% to 15.3%. The Maximum Dry Density (MDD) for 0.0 – 0.5m depth ranges from 1.68 g/m3 to 1.78 g/m3 and the optimum moisture content ranges from 11.3 g/m3- 15.7g/m3 while the Maximum Dry Density (MDD) for 0.5m - 1.0m depth ranges from 1.68g/m3 to 1.83g/m3 and the optimum moisture content ranges from 13g/m3 to 19g/m3. The coefficient of permeability for 0.0 - 0.5m depth ranges from 2.82E-04 to 4.92E-04 and ranges from 5.43E-04 to 9.11E-04 for 0.5 - 1.0m depth. The soil samples were classified to be A-4 and Silty Clay using AASHTO and USCS methods respectively. The result concluded that proposed area based on the geophysical and geotechnical investigations is suitable for the construction of engineered landfill.
Keywords
Geological Information, Geotechnical Information, Landfill, Vertical Electrical Sounding, Electrical Resistivity Sounding
References
[1] Adeniran, A. E., Nubi, A. T., and Adelopo, A. O. (2017). Solid waste generation and characterization in the University of Lagos for a sustainable waste management. Waste Management, 67, 3–10.
[2] Asante-Annor, A., Konadu, S. A., and Ansah, E. (2018). Determination of Potential Landfill Site in Tarkwa Area Using GIS, Geophysical and Geotechnical Evaluation. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 6(10), 1–27.
[3] Bhattacharya and Patra, 1968: Direct Current Electric Sounding (Methods in Geochemistry and Geophysics, 9.) ix + 135 p., 47 figs., 16 tables. Elsevier Publishing Co., Amsterdam, London, New York.
[4] Bhattacharya P. (2012): Direct Current Geoelectric Sounding, Principles And Interpretation. 1st Edition, Volume 9, Imprint: Elsevier
[5] Case, I. A., Fukhari, A., and Strip, S. G. (2017). Use of Electrical Resistivity Methods (2-D and VES) in Proposed Landfill Site Investigation. Journal of Environmental Geology, 11, 45–58.
[6] Fajardo, S., García-Galvan, R. F., Barranco, V., Galvan, J. C. and Batlle, S. F. (2016). Municipal Solid Waste Characterization and Management Systems, IntechOpen, 13–28.
[7] Federal University of Technology, Akure. (2022). FUTA Master Plan Report, Physical Planning Unit, FUTA.
[8] Geological and Of, 2015: Geological, J., and Of, S. (2015). Assessment of Site Suitability for Landfill Construction in Gbekele, Nigeria. 85(June), 745–752.
[9] Kingsley, E. N., Paschal, I. O., and Jude, E. O. (2016). Assessment of landfill sites for solid waste management in Delta state, Nigeria. Journal of Waste Resources, 3(1), 116–122.
[10] Manassero, M., Benson, C. H., & Bouazza, A. (2000). Solid waste containment systems. ISRM International Symposium 2000, 1–18.
[11] Mat, N. A., Benjamin, A. M., Abdul-Rahman, S., & Wibowo, A. (2016). A framework for landfill site selection using GIS and MCDM. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1782.
[12] Nkululeko S. D., Pawan K. J. and Atul S. (2025): Municipal solid waste characterisation and evaluation of
[13] waste to energy potential: A case study of Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, Vol. 28, 750–770.
[14] Owusu-Nimo, F., Oduro-Kwarteng, S., Essandoh, H., Wayo, F., & Shamudeen, M. (2019). Characteristics and management of landfill solid waste in Kumasi, Ghana. Scientific African, 3, e00052.
[15] Oyediran, I., (2017). Engineering Geological Evaluation Of A Proposed Landfill Site At Aba-Kulodi, Near Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria. Global Journal of Geological Sciences, 3(1), 87–9.
[16] Wadhah M. S. (2021): Electrical Geophysical Methods, Lecture in Electrical Geophysical Methods, AL-Karkh University of Science, College of Geophysics and Remote Sensing, Department of Geophysics
[17] Zeyad H. A., 2017): Use of Electrical Resistivity Methods (2-D and VES) in Proposed Landfill Site
[18] Investigation -A Case Study of Al Fukhari Landfill, Southeastern Gaza Strip, Palestine. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 7(3), 119-127.
How to cite this paper
@article{1722180,
author = {Oluwatosin Ayomiposi OYELEYE, Ayodeji Stanley OLOWOSELU},
title = {Geotechnical and Geophysical Investigation for The Federal University of Technology Akure (FUTA) Waste Containment Facility},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
pages = {879-888},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1722180.pdf},
abstract = {This research focuses on investigation of geological and geotechnical information that will aid the construction of the proposed FUTA waste containment facility (landfill) before the design, development, and construction due to non or inaccurately conducted geological and geotechnical investigation of selected land area used for solid waste disposal. The proposed landfill site is 4,795 m2 of FUTA municipal solid waste. Evaluation of the suitability for the construction of an engineered landfill was determined with geological, geophysical and geotechnical investigation. Geological test was carried out using previous study of the area. The geophysical investigation of Vertical Electrical Sounding and Electrical Resistivity Sounding method were carried out. Disturbed samples were taken at depths of 0.5 and 1.0m respectively with moisture content ranging from 14.20% to 23.40% for 0 – 0.5m depths, 16.20% to 20.40% for 0.5 to 1.0m, specific gravity. The Plastic Index (PI) for samples at depth 0.0-0.5m ranges from 10.9% to 13.2 while the Plastic Index (PI) for samples at depth 0.5-1.0m ranges from 11.1% to 15.3%. The Maximum Dry Density (MDD) for 0.0 – 0.5m depth ranges from 1.68 g/m3 to 1.78 g/m3 and the optimum moisture content ranges from 11.3 g/m3- 15.7g/m3 while the Maximum Dry Density (MDD) for 0.5m - 1.0m depth ranges from 1.68g/m3 to 1.83g/m3 and the optimum moisture content ranges from 13g/m3 to 19g/m3. The coefficient of permeability for 0.0 - 0.5m depth ranges from 2.82E-04 to 4.92E-04 and ranges from 5.43E-04 to 9.11E-04 for 0.5 - 1.0m depth. The soil samples were classified to be A-4 and Silty Clay using AASHTO and USCS methods respectively. The result concluded that proposed area based on the geophysical and geotechnical investigations is suitable for the construction of engineered landfill.},
keywords = {Geological Information, Geotechnical Information, Landfill, Vertical Electrical Sounding, Electrical Resistivity Sounding},
month = {August},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I2-1722180}
}