International Peer-Reviewed Journal•Open Access•ISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com•+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1723438

1723438 Vol 10 · Issue 3 Download Paper

Five Approaches to Computing e: Derivations, Error Bounds and History

Linet Muhati

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Pure Mathematics

DOI: 10.64388/IREV10I3-1723438

Abstract

Euler’s number e admits five classical characterisations: as the limit of (1+1/n)^n, as the sum of the reciprocals of the factorials, as the base whose exponential function is its own derivative, as the number whose natural logarithm is 1, and through its regular continued fraction [2;1,2,1,1,4,1,1,6,…]. This paper gives a self-contained account of the five approaches with complete proofs that they define the same number, and for each approach that yields an algorithm it proves an explicit error bound: e-(1+1/n)^n=e/(2n)+O(n^(-2) ), a remainder below 1/(n⋅n!) for the n-th partial sum of the series, and |e-p_k/q_k |<1/q_k^2 for the continued fraction convergents. It shows that the limit is exactly Euler’s method applied to y'=y, that the trapezoidal rule yields the second-order approximation ((2n+1)/(2n-1))^n, and that Newton’s method turns the integral definition into a quadratically convergent scheme. The methods are compared by the work needed per correct digit, and the historical account is corrected against primary and secondary sources.

Keywords

Continued fraction, Convergence rate, Euler’s number, Exponential function, Numerical approximation

References

[1] R. P. Burn, “Alphonse Antonio de Sarasa and logarithms,” Historia Math., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2001. ScienceDirect

[2] J. Bernoulli, “Quaestiones nonnullae de usuris, cum solutione problematis de sorte alearum,” Acta Eruditorum, pp. 219–223, 1690.

[3] N. Mercator, Logarithmotechnia. London, U.K., 1668.

[4] L. Euler, Introduction to Analysis of the Infinite, Book I, J. D. Blanton, Trans. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 1988. Springer

[5] L. Euler, “An essay on continued fractions,” M. F. Wyman and B. F. Wyman, Trans., Math. Systems Theory, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 295–328, 1985. Springer

[6] C. Hermite, “Sur la fonction exponentielle,” C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 77, pp. 18–24, 74–79, 226–233, 285–293, 1873.

[7] J. L. Coolidge, “The number e,” Amer. Math. Monthly, vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 591–602, 1950. Taylor & Francis

[8] E. Maor, e: The Story of a Number. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton Univ. Press, 1994.

[9] E. Hairer, S. P. Nørsett, and G. Wanner, Solving Ordinary Differential Equations I: Nonstiff Problems, 2nd ed., ser. Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, vol. 8. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1993. Springer

[10] H. J. Brothers and J. A. Knox, “New closed-form approximations to the logarithmic constant e,” Math. Intelligencer, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 25–29, 1998. Springer

[11] W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1976.

[12] M. Aigner and G. M. Ziegler, Proofs from THE BOOK, 6th ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2018. Springer

[13] B. Haible and T. Papanikolaou, “Fast multiprecision evaluation of series of rational numbers,” in Algorithmic Number Theory (ANTS-III), ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1423. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1998, pp. 338–350. Springer

[14] M. Spivak, Calculus, 4th ed. Houston, TX, USA: Publish or Perish, 2008.

[15] T. M. Apostol, Calculus, Vol. I, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 1967.

[16] C. D. Olds, Continued Fractions, ser. New Mathematical Library, vol. 9. Washington, DC, USA: Mathematical Association of America, 1963. Cambridge

[17] H. Cohn, “A short proof of the simple continued fraction expansion of e,” Amer. Math. Monthly, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 57–62, 2006. Taylor & Francis

[18] T. J. Osler, “A proof of the continued fraction expansion of e^(1/M),” Amer. Math. Monthly, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 62–66, 2006. Taylor & Francis

How to cite this paper

Linet Muhati "Five Approaches to Computing e: Derivations, Error Bounds and History" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 10 Issue 3 2026 Page 3177-3183 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1723438
Linet Muhati "Five Approaches to Computing e: Derivations, Error Bounds and History" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 3, Sep. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1723438
Linet Muhati (2026). Five Approaches to Computing e: Derivations, Error Bounds and History. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 10(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1723438
Linet Muhati "Five Approaches to Computing e: Derivations, Error Bounds and History" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 10, no. 3, Sep. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1723438
@article{1723438,
      author = {Linet Muhati},
      title = {Five Approaches to Computing e: Derivations, Error Bounds and History},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {3177-3183},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1723438.pdf},
      abstract = {Euler’s number e admits five classical characterisations: as the limit of (1+1/n)^n, as the sum of the reciprocals of the factorials, as the base whose exponential function is its own derivative, as the number whose natural logarithm is 1, and through its regular continued fraction [2;1,2,1,1,4,1,1,6,…]. This paper gives a self-contained account of the five approaches with complete proofs that they define the same number, and for each approach that yields an algorithm it proves an explicit error bound: e-(1+1/n)^n=e/(2n)+O(n^(-2) ), a remainder below 1/(n⋅n!) for the n-th partial sum of the series, and |e-p_k/q_k |<1/q_k^2 for the continued fraction convergents. It shows that the limit is exactly Euler’s method applied to y'=y, that the trapezoidal rule yields the second-order approximation ((2n+1)/(2n-1))^n, and that Newton’s method turns the integral definition into a quadratically convergent scheme. The methods are compared by the work needed per correct digit, and the historical account is corrected against primary and secondary sources.},
      keywords = {Continued fraction, Convergence rate, Euler’s number, Exponential function, Numerical approximation},
      month = {September},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV10I3-1723438}
  }