Home / Current Issue / Paper 1700733
Effect Of Learning Method And Self Regulation Of Interpersonal Intelligence In Learning Social Science
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Education
Abstract
This study Aimed to know the effect of learning methods and self-regulate on student's interpersonal intelligence. Data analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Followed by Dunnet test. The result Showed that: (1) interpersonal intelligence of students who were taught using the inquiry method is higher than students who were taught using the guided inqury method, (2) there were an interaction effect between learning methods and self-regulate on student's interpersonal intelligence , (3) for a group of students who has high self-regulate and using inquiry method is higher than students using guided inquiry method, (4) for a group of students who has low self-regulate and using guided inquiry is not higher than students using inquiry methods , Further trials are expected to find Appropriate learning method for students who were low self-regulate on interpersonal intelligence. Based on the results of the research is expected teachers in the process of learning of narrative writing using inquiry methods in students who have high self-regulation.
Keywords
learning method, self-regulation, interpersonal intelligence
References
[1] Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. National Science education standars. Washington DC: National Research Council (NRC).
[2] Baumeister, RF, & Vohs, KD (2007). Self- Regulation, Ego depletion, and Motivation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass,1,1-14.
[3] Boekaerts, M. (1993). Being concerned with the well-being and with learning. Educational Psychologist, 28 (2), 149-167.
[4] Deniz Gurcay1, Hatice Ozturk Ferah1 (2018), High School Students' Critical Thinking Related to Their metacognitive Physics Self-Regulation and Self-Efficacy Beliefs. Journal of Education and Training Studies., Vol. 6, No. 4;, pp.125-130.
[5] Elington, Fred Percival Hendry. 1988 EducationTechnology,Interpreting Sudjarwo S, Jakarta: Erland.
[6] Ergul, Remziye., Simsekly, Y., Calis, S., Ozdilek, Z., & Sanli, M. (2011). The effects of inquiry-based Science teaching on elementary school students' Science Science process skills and attitudes. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy(BJSEP),5(1), 48-68.
[7] Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2013). Using concept maps to Facilitate collaborative simulation-based inquiry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22 (3), 340-374.
[8] Hong, J. Hwang, M., Lui, M., Ho, H. & Chen, Y. (2014). Using a "prediction-observation- explanation" inquiry models to Enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by Reviews their Internet cognitive failure. Computers inEducation,72, 110-120.
[9] Lee, H.-S., Linn, MC, Varma, K., & Liu, OL (2010). How do technology-enhanced inquiry
[10] Llewellyn, D. (2011). Differrntiated Science Inquiry. California: Corwin.
[11] Mark Bennett. The Invisible Hand of Inquiry- based Learning. Childhood Education, 91: 5, 388-389, 00094056.2015.1090854
[12] Olagoke, AM (2014). Inquiry-Based Learning Approaches: The Best Practice For Basic Science Teachers. International Journal of Current Research and Review.6 (15), 15-19.
[13] Pintrich, PR (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 92 (3), 544-555
[14] Pintrich, RR (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, PR, ve Zeidner, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Self-regulation, (pp. 451-501), San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https:// 2/50043-3.
[15] Sumantri, M. S., & Rachmadtullah, R. (2016). The Effect of Learning Media and Self-Regulation to Elementary Students’ History Learning Outcome. Advanced Science Letters, 22(12), 4104-4108.
[16] Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scienti fi c argumentation. Science Education, 93 (3), 448-484.
[17] Schunk, DH (2001). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In BJ Zimmerman and DH Schunk (Eds.), Self- regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 281-303). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[18] Impact science classroom learning units ?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,47 (1), 71-90.
[19] Sutman, J., Schmuchler, JS, & Joyce DW (2008). The Science quest: Using inquiry / discoery to enchange studentlearning.New Jersey: Jossey-Bass.
[20] Shah Darwyan. 2009. Teaching and LearningStrategies.Jakarta: Diadit Media.
[21] Ucan, Serkan & Mary Webb (2015): Social Regulation of Learning During Collaborative Inquiry Learning in Science: How does it emerge and what are its functions ?, International Journal of Science Education,
[22] Wenning, CJ, & Mansoor, AK (2011). Levels of inquiry of Science teaching: Learning sequences to lesson plants. Journal Of Physics Teacher Education Online,6 (2), 17- 20.
[23] Zimmerman, BJ (2000). Attaining self- regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, PR Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (p. 13- 39). San Diego, CA: Academic.
[24] Zimmerman, BJ (2008). Investigating self- regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments and future prospects. American Educational ResearchJournal,45, 166-183.
[25] Zimmerman, BJ (2000b). Attaining self- regulation: A social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, Pintrich P., and M. Seidner (Eds.), Selfregulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 13-39). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
How to cite this paper
@article{1700733,
author = {Raziska Ibrahimi, Arita Marini, Etin Solihatin},
title = {Effect Of Learning Method And Self Regulation Of Interpersonal Intelligence In Learning Social Science},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2018},
volume = {2},
number = {2},
pages = {62-68},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1700733.pdf},
abstract = {This study Aimed to know the effect of learning methods and self-regulate on student's interpersonal intelligence. Data analysis using analysis of variance (ANOVA), Followed by Dunnet test. The result Showed that: (1) interpersonal intelligence of students who were taught using the inquiry method is higher than students who were taught using the guided inqury method, (2) there were an interaction effect between learning methods and self-regulate on student's interpersonal intelligence , (3) for a group of students who has high self-regulate and using inquiry method is higher than students using guided inquiry method, (4) for a group of students who has low self-regulate and using guided inquiry is not higher than students using inquiry methods , Further trials are expected to find Appropriate learning method for students who were low self-regulate on interpersonal intelligence. Based on the results of the research is expected teachers in the process of learning of narrative writing using inquiry methods in students who have high self-regulation.},
keywords = {learning method, self-regulation, interpersonal intelligence},
month = {August},
}