A Comparative Study of IS Code 1893-2002 and IS Code 1893-2016 for the Design of Earthquake Resistant Structure

References

[1] Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology Vol. 2, No. 1, 3-24, February 2004 / Copyright © 2004 Japan Concrete Institute 3 Invited Paper Earthquake Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings Past and Future Shunsuke Otani1.

[2] BIS (2002) IS 1893 (part 1): 2002—Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, part 1: general provisions and buildings (Fifth Revision). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

[3] Sagar R Padol, Rajashekhar S. Talikoti (2015) “Review paper on seismic responses of Multistored rcc building with mass irregularity”, IJRET: International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology eISSN: 2319-1163 pISSN: 2321-7308 Volume: 04 Issue: 03 |

[4] Anirudh Gottala Kintali Sai Nanda Kishore “Comparative Study of Static and Dynamic Seismic Analysis of a Multistoried Building”, IJSTE - International Journal of Science Technology & Engineering | Volume 2 | Issue 01 | July 2015 ISSN (online): 2349-784X All rights reserved by www.ijste.org 173.

[5] Mr. S. Mahesh1, Mr. Dr. B. Panduranga Rao, “Comparison of analysis and design of regular and irregular configuration of multi- Story building in various seismic zones and various types of soils using ETABS and STAAD, IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE) e-ISSN: 2278-1684, p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 11, Issue 6 Ver. I (Nov- Dec. 2014),

[6] Adem Doğangün And Ramazan Livaoğlu, Geneva, Switzerland “Comparison of Seismic Analysis Methods for Multistory Buildings”, 3-8 September 2006paper Number:1314

[7] Kiran Mai, Mohd Amer, Md. Shaibaz Ali, Mohammed Fazal Ahmed, Mohammed Omair, Aftab Tanveer, “Analysis and Design of Residential Building C+G+7 using E-TabsK. ISSN 2321-8665 Volume.06, Issue.01, January- June, 2018,

[8] S.K. Ahirwar1, S.K. Jain2 and M. M. Pande3. “EARTHQUAKE LOADS ON MULTISTOREY BUILDINGS AS PER IS: 1893-1984 AND IS:1893-2002: A COMPARATIVE STUDY”, The14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China.

[9] Rakesh Kumar Gupta, Prof. D.L. “Review of IS 1893:2016 with IS1893:2002 for high rise structure with irregularities”’ International Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Science, Vol. 3, No.7 2018 www.ijies.net 27

[10] Ajay Kumar and Jagdish Chand, “A Comparative Study of Static Analysis (As Per Is: 1893-2002) & Dynamic Analysis (As Per Is:1893- 2016) of a Building for Zone V”, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(3), 2019, pp. 2159-2170.

[11] Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019A. Rama Mohan Rao and K. Ramanjaneyulu (eds.), Recent Advances in Structural Engineering, Volume 2, Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 12, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13- 03654_13.

@article{1702742,
      author = {Simran N. Keer, Kalpesh M. Pilankar, Suyog V. Pilankar, Prof. Snehal S. Gujarathi},
      title = {A Comparative Study of IS Code 1893-2002 and IS Code 1893-2016 for the Design of Earthquake Resistant Structure},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2021},
      volume = {4},
      number = {12},
      pages = {4-8},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1702742.pdf},
      abstract = {There is a progressive improvement in earthquake resistant design has been observed in recent past. Due to such results Indian seismic code IS: 1893 has also been revised in year 2016, after a gap of 14 years. This project presents the seismic load estimation for multistorey buildings as per IS: 1893-2002 and IS: 1893- 2016 recommendations. The method of analysis and design of multi-storey (G+3) and (G+6) residential building located in zone IV. The scope behind presenting this project is to learn relevant Indian standard codes are used for design of various building element such as beam, column, slab, foundation and stair case using a software ETAB under the seismic load and wind load acting the structure. As the there is continuous analysis and efforts put by researchers to study the function and performance of structure during past earthquake give more power and work on development and advancement in designing earthquake resistant structure. Therefore, it is required to revise the seismic code time to time. IS: 1893-2016 revised after 14 years in year 2016.In this study an attempt is made to compare the multistoried building analyzed by using both IS 1893-2002 and IS 1893-2016. For this, Same building models with different number of storeys i.e. G+3 and G+6 are considered. The 3D analysis of building is carried out for earthquake zone IV. We had compared the parameters in project are Story Drift and base shear.},
      keywords = {Base Shear, Earthquake Design, Storey Drift},
      month = {June},
  }