The Impact of Mass-media on Collective Action in Rural Vaijapur, Aurangabad (MS) India

References

[1] Homero Gil De Zunig, Matthew Barnidge, and Andres Scherman, 2016, Social Media Social Capital, Offline Social Capital, and Citizenship: Exploring Asymmetrical Social Capital Effects, Political Communication,34: 44-68, 2017

[2] Eric M. Uslaner (2002), Social Capital, Television, and the “Mean World”: Trust, Optimism, and Civic Participation, political psychology, Vol.19, No.3, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00113 [Crossref]

[3] Marc Hooghe & Jennifer Oser (2015),Internet, television and social capital: the effect of ‘screen time’ on social capital, Information, Communication and Society, Vol.18, Issue.10, pp. 1175-1199.https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1022568

[4] Residents Fanbin Zeng, (2018), The Impact of Social Capital and Media Use on the Political Participation of Urban Residents, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323758896

[5] Sarah Geber, Helmut Scherer and Dorothee Hefner (2016), Social capital in media societies: The impact of media use and media structures on social capital, International Communication Gazette 78, (6), 493-513, https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048516640211

[6] Dhavan V. Shah (1998), Civic Engagement, Interpersonal Trust, and Television Use:An Individual –Level Assessment of Social Capital. Political Psychology Vo. 19, No. 3, 1998.

[7] DietlindStolle (1998), Bowling Together, Bowling Alone: The Development of Generalized Trust in Voluntary Associations, Political Psychology, Vol. 19, No. 3, Special Issue: Psychological Approaches to Social Capital (Sep., 1998), pp. 497-525, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

[8] Homero Gil De Zuniga, Nakwon Jung and Sebastian (2012), Social media use for News and Individual’s Social Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation, Journal ofComputer–MediatedCommunication,17,2012,319-336.,available at. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/

[9] AlexandreBertin and Nicolas Sirven(2006), Social Capital and the Capability Approach: A Socio Economic Theory. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/

[10] Lindon J. Robison (2023)The Cheap Side of Social Capital, February 5, 2023,https://www.socialcapitalresearch.com/

[11] Yifin Jiang and Oscar de Bruijn (2013, Facebook helps : A Case Study of Cross Cultural Social Networking and Social Capital, Information, Communication and Society, Aug.2013.

[12] Marc Hooghe (2002), Watching Television and Civic Engagement: Disentanglin the Effects of Time, Programs and Stations, The Harvard International Journal of Press/ Politics, 2002, 7;84, available at https://www.researchgate.net

[13] Keith Hampton(2003) Neighboring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and Social Capital in Wired Suburb, City &Community, Dec.2003 available at https://www.researchgate.net

@article{1704197,
      author = {Dr. Sheshrao K. Rathod, Dr. Lakshkaushik D. Puri},
      title = {The Impact of Mass-media on Collective Action in Rural Vaijapur, Aurangabad (MS) India},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2023},
      volume = {6},
      number = {9},
      pages = {330-338},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1704197.pdf},
      abstract = {The close, intimate relationships and social cohesion that once prevailed among rural people have diminished today. It accepts the close cooperation and face-to-face contact has promotes pro-social behaviour. In order to find out which factors are responsible for the diminishing of social cohesion or social capital, we have collected a data through from ninety respondents of ten villages of Vaijapur tehsil with the help of survey questionnaire. The result shows that, local political factionalism and casteism are eroding rural social capital more than TV and mobile phones. Religious activities are the main causes for to gathering of rural people. 62.2% of the respondents say that they have do not time to participate in community development programs whereas 53.3% of the respondents say that they have not accepted the membership of any organizations, groups which are functioning at village.When comes to social media 94.44% respondents are (87.8% respondents using WhatsApp and 55.6% Facebook) using internet while 78.9% respondents say they use mobile/internet to get information on agriculture, politics, business, entertainment and other important issues.},
      keywords = {Media, Bridging, social cohesion, collective action, internet},
      month = {March},
  }