International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1704345

1704345 Vol 6 · Issue 10 Download Paper

Paulinian Synchronous Learning Platform In-depth Analysis: Basis for an Enhanced Online Learning Model

Dr. Regidor T. Carale Dr. Marissa M. Carale Edsel T. Carale, Mave

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Curriculum and Instructions

Abstract

Schools? ability to adapt to changing conditions is critical in dealing with uncertainties and circumstances surrounding the COVID-19 outbreak. Concerns about efficacy, validity, and adaptability prompted change in teaching, learning, and assessment practices. The study used triangulation with three methods: Thematic Analysis (Jack Caulfield,2022), Collaize's (1978) method of explication, and Dr. Prince Germano's COWS matrix. The general objective of the research was to come up with an enhanced online learning model that allows smooth transition of strategies based on internal and external elements identified. There were 34 teacher participants in this research from different levels in the university.Internet Connection, Technical Issues, Power Outages, and Learning Environment are all major challenges that disturb the learning span and the integrity of assessment. Technological literacy, Teaching activities appropriate in an online context, and communication gaps owing to technical challenges were also noted as weaknesses. Benefits include teacher and student versatility, ingenuity, self-discipline, quality time, cost effectiveness, and varied teaching methodologies. While creativity, self-discipline, timely feedback, and open communication were identified as strengths. Contextualized teaching methodologies be developed utilizing resources at home while involving family members to enhance creativity and intimacy. Immediate input across a variety of platforms is essential.

Keywords

Challenges, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strength, Online, synchronous, asynchronous

References

[1] Agostinho, S., Lefoe, G., & Hedberg, J. (1997). Online collaboration for learning: A case study of a post graduate university course. Proceedings of the Third Australian World Wide Web Conference, 5-9 July, Southern Cross University, Australia. [verified 26 Jan 2003] http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw97/papers/agostinh/index.htm

[2] Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied 425 Social Psychology, 32(4), 665.

[3] Alin, P. 2020. Detecting and prosecuting contract cheating with evidence – a “doping test” approach. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s40979-020-00056-4

[4] Allen, I. E., and Seaman, J. (2017). Digital Learning Compass: Distance Education Enrollment Report 2017. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group, e-Literate, and WCET. Available at: https://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/digtiallearningcompassenrollment2017.pdf.

[5] Albert, R. S. (Ed.). (1983). Genius and eminence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press Ltd.

[6] Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

[7] Ariffin, K, Halim, N. A., & Darus, N. A. (2020). Discovering Students’ Strategies in Learning English Online. Asian Journal of University Education (AJUE), 17(1), 261-268.

[8] Ashton, H. & Zalzala, A. (2000). Enhancing traditional learning: The use of multimedia material on the Internet. Paper Presented at the 8th Annual Conference on Teaching of Computing, Edinburgh. [viewed 15 Oct 2001, verified 26 Jan 2003] http://www.ics.ltsn.ac.uk/pub/conf2000/Papers/ashton.htm

[9] Brack, C. (1996). Linking the data to develop knowledge: A neglected part of developing web-based university resource. Paper presented at Ausweb96, Gold Coast, Australia, July 1996. [verified 26 Jan 2003] http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw96/educn/brack/index.htm

[10] Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 1- 9. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7937

[11] Balter, E. Enstrom, B. Klingenberg (2013). The effect of short formative diagnostic webquizzes with minimal feedback. Computers and Education, 60 (1) (2013), pp.234-242.

[12] Barrot, Jessie S. Llenares, Ian I. & Leo S. del Rosario (2021) Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines Education and Information Technologies volume 26, pages7321–7338 (2021)

[13] Bowman, R. F. (2005). Teacher as servant leader. The Clearing House, 78(6), 257-259.

[14] Bretag, T. 2016. Educational integrity in Australia. In: T Bretag (Ed.). Handbook of academic integrity (pp 1-13). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_2-1

[15] Bruner, J. (2007). Factors motivating and inhibiting faculty in offering their courses via distance learning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, X(II), 1-27.

[16] Cavanaugh, C., Gillan, K. J., Kromrey, J., Hess, M., & Blomeyer, R. (2004). The effects of distance education on K-12 student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript.

[17] Cambre, Marjorie et al. (1996). The Challenge of Distance Education. Journal of Staff Development v.17, p. 38- 41.

[18] Center for Academic Integrity (ICAI). 2021. The fundamental values of academic integrity, third edition. Delaware: The International Center for Academic Integrity

[19] Chen, Y. S., Kao, T. C., & Sheu, J. P. (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00036.x

[20] Choy, S.; McNickle, C. & Clayton, B., (2009). Learner expectations and experiences. Student views of support in online learning, National Centre for Vocational Education Research

[21] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row. 96

[22] Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publisher.

[23] David, John (2008). Is Educational technology shortening student attention span? Source: Learning & Leading with Technology.Date Retrieved: May 24, 2022

[24] DeBrock, Larry, Scagnoli, Norma, and Tagnaboni-Dutta, Fataneh (2020). The human element in online learning. How to make online learning more intimate and engaging for students (opinion) (insidehighered.com) Date retrieved: May 26, 2022

[25] Deng, Q., & Wu, Z. (2018b). Students’ Attention Assessment in eLearning based on Machine Learning. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 199(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/199/3/032042

[26] De Villiers, G. (2001). An evaluation of asynchronous web-based learning technologies. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Conference on World Wide Web Applications, Rand Afrikaans University, South Africa, 5-7 Se

[27] Drexel University School of Education (2022). How to use technology in the classroom: benefits & effects How to Integrate Technology in the Classroom | Drexel University Date Retrieved: May 27, 2022

[28] Eaton, S.E. & Turner, K.L. 2020. Exploring academic integrity and mental health during COVID-19: Rapid review. Journal of Contemporary Education Theory & Research, 4: 35-41.

[29] Fauziana Binti Mohd, S. (2020). Pandemik Coronavirus (COVID-19): Pembelajaran Dan Pengajaran Secara Atas Talian Suatu Keperluan Di Malaysia. Bentong. Research Gate.

[30] Flannery, M., & McGarr, O. (2014) Flexibility in higher education: An Irish perspective. Irish Educational Studies, 33(4), 419- 434. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2014.978658

[31] Fontaine, S., Frenette, E. & Herbert, M.H. 2020. Exam cheating among Quebec’s preservice teachers: The influencing factors. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 16: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-020-00062-6

[32] Foster, C Weiser, A. Maur (2018). How feedback provided by voluntary electronic quizzes affects learning outcomes of university students in large classes. Computers and Education, 121 (2018), pp. 100-114, 10.1016/j.compedu. 2018.02.012

[33] Galusha, M. Jill. (2001). Barriers to Learning in Distance Education. http://www.infrastruction.com/barriers.htm The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET October 2003 ISSN: 1303-6521 volume 2 Issue 4 Article 2

[34] Garrick, J., & Jakupec, V. (2000). Flexible learning, work and human resource development. In

[35] Jakupec & J. Garrick (Eds.), Flexible learning, human resource and organizational development. Putting theory to work (pp. 1-8). London: Routledge.

[36] Gorbunovsa, Atis Kapenieksb , and Sarma Cakula (2021). Self-discipline as a key indicator to improve learning outcomes in elearning environment. International Conference; Meaning in Translation: Illusion of Precision, MTIP2016, 11-13 May 2016, Riga, Latvia

[37] Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press

[38] Haber, J. R. (2005). Perceptions of barriers concerning effective on-line teaching and policies: Florida community college full-time faculty members. (Ph.D., University of South Florida).

[39] Hard, S. F., Conway, J. M., and Moran, A. C. (2006). Faculty and College Student Beliefs about the Frequency of Student Academic Misconduct. J. Higher Edu. 77 (6), 1058–1080. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0048

[40] Harmon, O. R., and Lambrinos, J. (2008). Are Online Exams an Invitation to Cheat?. J. Econ. Edu. 39 (2), 116–125. doi:10.3200/jece.39.2.116-125

[41] Harrison E. and McTavish, M. (2018). ‘i’Babies: Infants’ And Toddlers’ Emergent Language And Literacy in a Digital Culture of Idevices. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 18, 163-188.

[42] Hartnett, M., & Hartnett, M. (2016). The Importance of Motivation in Online Learning. In Motivation in Online Education (pp. 5–32). Massey University. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 981-10-0700-2_2

[43] Hart, T., Whyte, J., Ellis, C., & Chervoneva, I. (2009). Construct Validity of an Attention Rating Scale for Traumatic Brain Injury. Neuropsychology, 23(6), 729–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016153

[44] Hazwani Mohd N., Noor Raudhiah Abu B. and Norziah O. (2020). E-Pembelajaran Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Di Sebuah Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Selangor. Selangor. Malaysian atas talian. Journal of Education.

[45] Hebatalla Kaoud, Dina El-Shihy, Mostafa Yousri (2021). Online Learning in Egyptian Universities Post COVID-19 Pandemic: A student’s perspective. NewGiza University (NGU), Cairo, Egypt Heba.kaoud@ngu.edu.eg

[46] Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005

[47] Hussin, N. (2017). Penggunaan Laman Web Sebagai Transformasi dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Islam. O-JIE: atas talian. Journal of Islamic Education, 1(2)

[48] Isman, Atekin, Dabaj, Fahme, Altinay, Fahriye, & Altinay, Zehra (2003). Communication barriers in distance learning. The Turkish Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET October 2003 ISSN: 1303-6521. Volume 2 Issue 4 article 2

[49] Jaschik, S., and Lederman, D. (2018). 2018 Survey of Faculty Attitudes on Technology: A Study by inside Higher Ed and Gallup. Washington, DC. Gallup, Inc. Available at: https://www.insidehighered.com/system/files/media/IHE_2018_Survey_Faculty_Technology.pdf.

[50] Kennedy, C. (1998). Online education: How does it benefit students. The Advocate, December. [viewed 31 Oct 2001, verified 26 Jan 2003] http://smccd.net/accounts/kennedyc/rsch/advocate-dec.htm

[51] Koi-Akrofi, G. Y., Owusu-Oware, E., & Tanye, H. (2020) Challenges of Distance, Blended, And Online Learning: A Literature-Based Approach. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education (IJITE), 9(4). https://doi.org/10.5121/ijite.2020.9403

[52] Kokoç, M., Ilgaz, H., & Altun, A. (2020). Individual cognitive differences and student engagement in video lectures and elearning environments. In E. Alqurashi (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Fostering Student Engagement with Instructional Technology in Higher Education (pp. 78-93). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/9

[53] Lathrop, A. (2011). Impact of Student Motivation in Online Learning Activities. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronhortdiss/24

[54] Lee, J., & Martin, L. (2017). Investigating students’ perceptions of motivating factors of online class discussions. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 18(5), 148–172. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.2883

[55] Lo, H. A. (2005). A mapping study: Characteristics of professional online instructors. (Ed.D., University of Cincinnati).

[56] Olojo, O. J., Adewumi, M. G., & Ajisola, K. T. (2012). E-learning and its effects on teaching and learning in a global age. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(1), 203-210. Retrieved from http://www.hrmars.com/admin/pics/484.pdf

[57] Pandey, S., & Singaravelan, R. R. M. (2019). Effects of Music Therapy on Cognitive Function and Mood in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke. 9(July), 151–157.

[58] Pardo, J. Jovanovic, S. Dawson, D. Gasevic, N. Mirriahi (2017) Using learning analytics to scal the provision of personalized feedback. Brisitsh Journal of Educational Technology (2017), 10.1111/bjet,12592

[59] Mansor, A. N., Zabarani, N. H., Jamaludin, K. A., Mohd Nor, M. Y., Alias, B. S., & Mansor, A. Z. (2021). Home-Based Learning (HBL) Teacher Readiness Scale: Instrument Development and Demographic Analysis. Sustainability, 13(4), 2228. MDPI AG. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13042228

[60] Maslow, A. H. (1998). Maslow on management. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[61] McTighe, Jay. & O’Connor, Ken M., (2005), Seven practices for effective learning, Educational Leadership, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. 63, 10-17

[62] Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R. F., & Baki, M. (2013) The Effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115, 1-47.

[63] Meyer, K. A. (2014). Student engagement in online learning: What works and why. ASHE Higher Education Report, 40(6), 1- 114.

[64] Mncube, V.S., Mutongoza, B.H., & Olawale, B.E. 2021. Managing higher education institutions in the context of COVID-19 stringency: Experiences of stakeholders at a rural South African university. Perspectives in Education, 39(1): 390-409. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie. v39.i1.24

[65] Muhammad, N., & Srinivasan, S. (2021). Online Education During a Pandemic-Adaptation and Impact on Student Learning. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 11(3).

[66] Muirhead, B. (2007). Integrating creativity into online university classes. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(1), 1-13.

[67] Muongoza, Bongingkosi Hardy & Olawale, Babawande Emmanuel (2022). Safeguarding academic integrity in the face of emergency remote teaching and learning in developing countries. 1 University of Fort Hare, South Africa. e-ISSN 2519-593X Perspectives in Education 2022 40(1): 234-249

[68] Northcote, M., Gosselin, K., & Reynaud, D. (2015). Navigating learning journeys of online teachers: Threshold concepts and self-efficacy. Issues in Educational Research, 25(3), 319–344.

[69] Nicol, D. & Macfarlane-Dick, D., (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice, Studies in Higher Education, Routledge, 31, 199-218

[70] Nkonge, B. I. N. (2004). Pedagogical beliefs, perceptions, and practices of faculty in web-based instruction: A multiple case study. (Ph.D., The University of North Carolina at Greensboro).

[71] Nor Fauziana Binti Mohd, S. (2020). Pandemik Coronavirus (COVID-19): Pembelajaran Dan Pengajaran Secara Atas Talian Suatu Keperluan Di Malaysia. Bentong. Research Gate

[72] Nurul Haidah Saidon, Muhammad Ilham Ahmad Zaini, Muhammad Athif Asyraf Sukry, Mohamad Izzuan Mohd Ishar. (2020). Amalan Kemahiran Penyesuaian dalam Kalangan Pelajar Universities. Suatu Pemerhatian Awal. Johor. Malaysian Journal of Social Science dan Humanities.

[73] Mailizar Almanthari, A., Maulina, S., and Bruce, S. (2020). Secondary School Mathematics Teachers’ Views On E-Learning Implementation Barriers During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Case of Indonesia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1860.

[74] Nurul Haidah Saidon, Muhammad Ilham Ahmad Zaini, Muhammad Athif Asyraf Sukry, Mohamad Izzuan Mohd Ishar. (2020). Amalan Kemahiran Penyesuaian dalam Kalangan Pelajar Universiti. Suatu Pemerhatian Awal. Johor. Malaysian Journal of Social Science dan Humanities.

[75] Pusvyta, S. (2015). Memotivasi belajar dengan menggunakan E-Learning. Jurnal Ummul Quro, 6(2), 20

[76] Ratheeswari, K. (2018). Information Communication Technology in Education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research. 3. 45. DOI: 10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.169

[77] Ritchhart, R. (2004). Creative teaching in the shadow of the standards. Independent School, 63(2), 32-6, 38-41.

[78] Ryan, M., Carlton, R. H., & Ali, N. S. (1999). Evaluation of traditional classroom teaching methods versus course delivery via the world wide web. Journal of Nursing Education, 38(6), 272-277.

[79] Salmon, G. (2001). Introducing E-tivities: The key to engaging students in online learning. Workshop 9 Presentation, Online Educa Berlin. Open University Business School, UK, 28 November. [viewed 29 Oct 2001, not found 28 Jan 2003] http://www.online-educa.com/workshops/09.htm

[80] Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12-20.

[81] Savery, J. R. (2005). Be vocal: Characteristics of successful online instructors. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(2), 141-152.

[82] Schrum, L., & Hong, S. (2002). Dimensions and strategies for online success: Voices from experienced educators. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 1-6.

[83] Slay, J. (1997). The use of the Internet in creating an effective learning environment. Proceedings of the Third Australian World Wide Web Conference, 5-9 July, Southern Cross University, Australia. [verified 28 Jan 2003] http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw97/papers/slay/index.htm

[84] Shneiderman, B. (1994). Education by engagement and construction: Can distance learning be better than face-to-face? Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, 12 April. [viewed 29 Oct 2001, verified 28 Jan 2003] http://www.hitl.washington.edu/scivw/EVE/distance.html

[85] Soffer, T., Kahan, T., & Nachmias, R. (2019). Patterns of students’ utilization of flexibility in online academic courses and their relation to course achievement. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.3949

[86] Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, H. M. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 59-70. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003

[87] Surjono, Pusvyta(2015). Memotivasi belajar dengan menggunakan E-Learning. Jurnal Ummul Quro, 6(2), 20.

[88] Tanner, J. R., Noser, T. C., & Totaro, M. W. (2009). Business faculty and undergraduate students' perceptions of online learning: A comparative study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(1), 29-40.

[89] Tan, J. & Wong, S. (1996). The Internet as a learning tool: Planning perspectives (The Singapore experience). Proceedings of the Internet Society’s INET96 Conference, Transforming Our Society Now, Montreal, Canada, 24-28 June. [verified 28 Jan 2003] http://www.isoc.org/inet96/proceedings/c6/c6_3.htm

[90] Teacher Education through School-based Support in India www.TESS-India.edu.in. Monitoring, assessment and feedback. Language and Literacy. Tess India. Date Retrieved: May 27, 2022

[91] Wallace, R. M. (2004). A framework for understanding teaching with the Internet. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 447–488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002447

[92] Woit, Denise & Mason, David (2203). Effectiveness of online assessment. SIGCSE '03: Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education February 2003 Pages 137–141https://doi.org/10.1145/611892.611952

[93] Wildana Wargadinata, Iffat Maimunah, Eva Dewi & Zainur Rofiq. (2020). Student’s Responses on Learning in the Early COVID-19 Pandemic. Malang, Indonesia. Journal of Education and Teacher Training

[94] Zhong, R. (2020, March 17). The coronavirus exposes education’s digital divide. Retrieved from The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/technology/chinaschools-coronavirus.html

How to cite this paper

Dr. Regidor T. Carale, Dr. Marissa M. Carale, Edsel T. Carale, Mave "Paulinian Synchronous Learning Platform In-depth Analysis: Basis for an Enhanced Online Learning Model" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 6 Issue 10 2023 Page 656-675
Dr. Regidor T. Carale, Dr. Marissa M. Carale, Edsel T. Carale, Mave "Paulinian Synchronous Learning Platform In-depth Analysis: Basis for an Enhanced Online Learning Model" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 6, no. 10, Apr. 2023
Dr. Regidor T. Carale, Dr. Marissa M. Carale, Edsel T. Carale, Mave (2023). Paulinian Synchronous Learning Platform In-depth Analysis: Basis for an Enhanced Online Learning Model. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 6(10).
Dr. Regidor T. Carale, Dr. Marissa M. Carale, Edsel T. Carale, Mave "Paulinian Synchronous Learning Platform In-depth Analysis: Basis for an Enhanced Online Learning Model" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 6, no. 10, Apr. 2023.
@article{1704345,
      author = {Dr. Regidor T. Carale, Dr. Marissa M. Carale, Edsel T. Carale, Mave},
      title = {Paulinian Synchronous Learning Platform In-depth Analysis: Basis for an Enhanced Online Learning Model},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2023},
      volume = {6},
      number = {10},
      pages = {656-675},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1704345.pdf},
      abstract = {Schools? ability to adapt to changing conditions is critical in dealing with uncertainties and circumstances surrounding the COVID-19 outbreak. Concerns about efficacy, validity, and adaptability prompted change in teaching, learning, and assessment practices. The study used triangulation with three methods: Thematic Analysis (Jack Caulfield,2022), Collaize's (1978) method of explication, and Dr. Prince Germano's COWS matrix. The general objective of the research was to come up with an enhanced online learning model that allows smooth transition of strategies based on internal and external elements identified. There were 34 teacher participants in this research from different levels in the university.Internet Connection, Technical Issues, Power Outages, and Learning Environment are all major challenges that disturb the learning span and the integrity of assessment. Technological literacy, Teaching activities appropriate in an online context, and communication gaps owing to technical challenges were also noted as weaknesses. Benefits include teacher and student versatility, ingenuity, self-discipline, quality time, cost effectiveness, and varied teaching methodologies. While creativity, self-discipline, timely feedback, and open communication were identified as strengths. Contextualized teaching methodologies be developed utilizing resources at home while involving family members to enhance creativity and intimacy. Immediate input across a variety of platforms is essential.},
      keywords = {Challenges, Opportunities, Weaknesses, and Strength, Online, synchronous, asynchronous},
      month = {April},
  }