Home / Current Issue / Paper 1704380
The Effect of Arrogance and Collusion on Fraudulent Financial Statements (in the automotive and components sub-sector on the IDX 2017-2021)
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Finance
Abstract
Fraud in financial statements is a paradigm that often occurs in Indonesia and causes many losses. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to detect potential fraudulent financial statements by using hexagon fraud which is focused on arrogance and collusion. In the fraud hexagon there are six dominant factors that can trigger the emergence of fraud against financial statements, namely pressure, opportunity, rationalization, ability, arrogance and collusion. In this study will focus on arrogance and collusion. Arrogance is proxied by CEO duality and collusion is proxied by political connections. In this study, the dependent variable was measured using the F-Score Model in order to find out how big the potential for fraud to appear in financial statements. The purposive sampling technique was used in this study to obtain a population sample with the criteria of BUMN companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, for the last 5 years, namely, 2017 ? 2021 which have always reported their financial statements in rupiah. The results of this study indicate that the personal financial need, CEO duality and political connection variables have an influence on the potential for fraud to arise in financial reports.
Keywords
Financial Statement Fraud, Arrogancy, Collution Hexagon Theory, Fraud.
References
[1] L. Ibrahim, H. Darwis, and S. Supriatiningsih, “Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance Dalam Menekan Tindakan Kecurangan Pada Perusahaan Go Green Di Indonesia,” J. Akunt., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 248–263, 2022, 10.37932/ja.v11i2.687.
[2] A. E. K. A. Samukri, Supriatiningsih, Ridwan saleh, “Auditor Competence and The Use of Information Technology in Produce Quality Audits in The Era of The Industrial Revolution 4 . 0 ( Study on Auditors at KAP South Jakarta , Indonesia ),” vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 13–21, 2022.
[3] Association of Certified Fraud Examiners Indonesia, “Survei Fraud Indonesia 2019,” Indones. Chapter #111, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1–76, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://acfe- indonesia.or.id/survei-fraud-indonesia/
[4] D. Novarina and D. N. Triyanto, “Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada Perusahaan LQ 45 Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2016-2020,” J. Akunt. dan Keuang., vol. 10, no. 2, p. 183, 2022, 10.29103/jak.v10i2.7352.
[5] J. & Mekling, “Journal of Financial Economic 3,” Hum. Relations, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 1671– 1696, 1976,
[6] N. Kalbuana, K. Kusiyah, S. Supriatiningsih, R. Budiharjo, T. Budyastuti, and R. Rusdiyanto, “Effect of profitability, audit committee, company size, activity, and board of directors on sustainability,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 0 –17, 2022, 10.1080/23311975.2022.2129354.
[7] S. G. Sagala and V. Siagian, “3956-Article Text-15431-1-10-20211103,” J. Akunt., vol. 13, no. November, pp. 245–259, 2021.
[8] D. R. Cressey, “Other people‟s money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement.,” 1953.
[9] D. T. Wolfe and D. R. Hermanson, “The FWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R. (2004) „The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud: Certified Public Accountant‟, The CPA Journal, 74(12), pp. 38– 42. Four ElemWolfe, D. T. and Hermanson, D. R.,” CPA J., vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 38–42, 2004.
[10] G. L. Vousinas, “Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model,” J. Financ. Crime, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 372–381, 2019, 10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128.
[11] A. S. Maharani, “Analisis Fraud Pentagon Theory Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi pada Perusahaan LQ- 45 yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) Periode 2014-2016) OLEH:,” J. Algoritm., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 579–587, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://jurtek.akprind.ac.id/bib/rancang-bangun- website-penyedia-layanan-weblog
[12] T. Akbar, “the Determination of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Causes By Using Pentagon Theory on Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia,” Int. J. Business, Econ. Law, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 106–112, 2017.
[13] K. S. Sihombing and S. N. Rahardjo, “Analisis Fraud Diamond dalam Mendeteksi Financial Statement Fraud (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2010 – 2012),” Diponegoro J. Account., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2014, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal- s1.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting
[14] H. F. Bawekes, A. M. Simanjuntak, and S. Christina Daat, “Pengujian Teori Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2011-2015),” J. Akunt. Keuang. Drh., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 114–134, 2018.
[15] B. L. Handoko and K. A. Ramadhani, “Pengaruh Karakteristik Komite Audit, Keahlian Keuangan Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Kemungkinan Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan [The Influence of Audit Committee Characteristics, Financial Expertise, and Company Size toward the Possibility of Financial Repo,” DeReMa (Development Res. Manag. J. Manaj., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 86, 2017,
[16] F. R. Siddiq, M. Magister, A. Universitas, and S. Hadinata, “Fraud Diamond Dalam Financial,” Bisnis, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 98–114, 2016.
[17] N. Kalbuana, M. Taqi, L. Uzliawati, and D. Ramdhani, “CEO narcissism , corporate governance , financial distress , and company size on corporate tax avoidance CEO narcissism , corporate governance , financial distress , and company size on corporate tax,” Cogent Bus. Manag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 0–22, 2023,
[18] I. Budiyono and M. S. D. Arum, “Determinants in detecting fraud triangle of financial statements on companies registered in Jakarta Islamic Index (JII) period 2012-2018,” J. Islam. Account. Financ. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, p. 117, 2020,
[19] C. K. Dewi and A. Yuliati, “Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Makanan dan Minuman Yang Terdaftar di BEI),” J. Ris. Terap. Akunt., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 115–128, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.polsri.ac.id/index.php/jrtap/article /view/4645
[20] H. Crowe, “Why the fraud triangle is no longer enough,” Horwath, Crowe LLP, 2011.
[21] C. Gaio and I. Pinto, “The role of state ownership on earnings quality: evidence across public and private European firms,” J. Appl. Account. Res., vol. 19, p. 0, Mar. 2018, 10.1108/JAAR-07-2016-0067.
[22] C. R. R. Mubarokah, “Pengaruh Likuiditas Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Kecukupan Modal,” 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.bankmuamalat.co.id/hubungan-
[23] M. Annisya, Lindrianasari, and Y. Asmaranti, “Pendeteksian Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Menggunakan Fraud Diamond,” J. Bisnis dan Ekon., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 72–89, 2016.
[24] D. D. H. Afdal and D. Yeasy, “Pengaruh Financial Stability, External Pressure, Ineffective Monitoring Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Pada …,” pp. 2–4, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://repo.bunghatta.ac.id/5597/
[25] V. Miftahul Jannah, A. Andreas, and M. Rasuli, “Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Pelaporan Keuangan,” Stud. Akunt. dan Keuang. Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2021, 10.21632/saki.4.1.1-16.
[26] S. Ayem, D. K. Wardani, and L. Mas‟adah, “Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon terhadap Fraudulent Financial Statement dengan Komite Audit sebagai Variabel Moderasi,” Al-Kharaj J. Ekon. Keuang. Bisnis Syariah, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 824–842, 2022, 10.47467/alkharaj.v5i2.1244.
[27] R. V Marbun, A. M. Putra, and A. Wijayanti, “Koneksi Politik dan Manajemen Skandal: Sebuah Temuan Empiris Perusahaan BUMN,” J. Ris. dan Apl. Akunt. dan Manaj., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 145 –158, 2021, 10.33795/jraam.v5i2.002.
[28] S. P. Sari and N. K. Nugroho, “Financial Statements Fraud dengan Pendekatan Vousinas Fraud Hexagon Model: Tinjauan pada Perusahaan Terbuka di Indonesia 26,” 1st Annu. Conf. Ihtifaz Islam. Econ. Financ. Bank., pp. 409–430, 2020.
[29] Samuel Gevanry Sagala, “Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Model Terhadap Fraudulent Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Makanan dan Minuman yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2016-2019” Jurnal Akuntansi, Program Studi Akuntansi, Fakultas Bisnis, Universitas Kristen Maranatha., Volume 13, Nomor 2, November 2021, pp 245-259 Copyright 2017.
How to cite this paper
@article{1704380,
author = {Citra Kurnia Bumi, Supriatiningsih},
title = {The Effect of Arrogance and Collusion on Fraudulent Financial Statements (in the automotive and components sub-sector on the IDX 2017-2021)},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2023},
volume = {6},
number = {11},
pages = {55-67},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1704380.pdf},
abstract = {Fraud in financial statements is a paradigm that often occurs in Indonesia and causes many losses. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to detect potential fraudulent financial statements by using hexagon fraud which is focused on arrogance and collusion. In the fraud hexagon there are six dominant factors that can trigger the emergence of fraud against financial statements, namely pressure, opportunity, rationalization, ability, arrogance and collusion. In this study will focus on arrogance and collusion. Arrogance is proxied by CEO duality and collusion is proxied by political connections. In this study, the dependent variable was measured using the F-Score Model in order to find out how big the potential for fraud to appear in financial statements. The purposive sampling technique was used in this study to obtain a population sample with the criteria of BUMN companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange, for the last 5 years, namely, 2017 ? 2021 which have always reported their financial statements in rupiah. The results of this study indicate that the personal financial need, CEO duality and political connection variables have an influence on the potential for fraud to arise in financial reports.},
keywords = {Financial Statement Fraud, Arrogancy, Collution Hexagon Theory, Fraud.},
month = {May},
}