Nature-inspired approaches in Software Fault Prediction

References

[1] The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. “29119 -1-2013 - Software and systems engineering —Software testing.” IEEE Standards Association.

[2] International Organization for Standardization. “What Is a Standard?” ISO Standards.

[3] I Gondra, Applying machine learning to software fault-proneness prediction, Journal of Systems and Software, 2008

[4] P. Oman and J. Hagemeister, “Construction and testing of polynomials predicting software maintainability,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 251–266, Mar. 1994.

[5] Naik K, Tripathy P. Software Testing and Quality Assurance. Theory and Practice. Wiley, 2008, 616p.

[6] Myers G, Badgett T, Sandler C. The Art of Software Testing. 3rd Edition. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons; 2014.

[7] Spillner A, Linz T, Schaefer H. Software Testing Foundations. 4th Edition.. Santa Barbara: Rocky Nook Inc.; 2014.

[8] Meyer B. Seven Principles of Software Testing. Computer 2008, August:99-101.

[9] Autili M, Di Salle A, Gallo F, Perucci A, and Tivoli M., Biological Immunity and Software Resilience: Two Faces of the Same Coin?, in A. Fantechi and P. Patrizio ( E d s . ) : S E R E N E 2 0 1 5 , L N C S 9 2 7 4 , DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-23129-71, 1–15, 2015.

[10] Madsen H, Thyregod P, Burtschy B, Albeanu G, Popentiu F. A Fuzzy Logic Approach to Software Testing and Debugging. In: Guedes Soares, Zio E, editors. Safety and Reliability for Managing Risk , London:Taylor & Francisc Group; 2006, p. 1435-1442.

[11] C. Catal and B. Diri, “A systematic review of software fault prediction studies,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 7346–7354, May 2009.

[12] V. U. B. CHALLAGULLA, F. B. BASTANI, I.-L. YEN, and R. A. PAUL, “EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF MACHINE LEARNING BASED SOFTWARE DEFECT PREDICTION TECHNIQUES,” Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools, vol. 17, no. 02, pp. 389–400, Apr. 2008.

[13] H. Tanwar and M. Kakkar, “A Review of Software Defect Prediction Models,” Springer, Singapore, 2019, pp. 89–97 - 12th Sept 2019

[14] Tim Menzies, Justin DiStefano, Andres Orrego, Robert (Mike) Chapman, “Assessing Predictors of Software Defects” - Jan 2004

[15] M. Jureczko and L. Madeyski, “Towards identifying software project clusters with regard to defect prediction,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Predictive Models in Software Engineering - PROMISE ’10, 2010, p. 1 - 12th Sept 2010

@article{1704594,
      author = {Harshit Saini, Tushar Arora, Sachin Garg},
      title = {Nature-inspired approaches in Software Fault Prediction},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2023},
      volume = {6},
      number = {12},
      pages = {71-76},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1704594.pdf},
      abstract = {In software engineering, predicting software faults is a crucial task for ensuring high software quality and reducing costs. In recent years, nature inspired approaches have been increasingly used in software fault prediction. In this paper, we explore the effectiveness of six nature inspired algorithms, namely Ant Colony, Particle Swarm Optimization, Firefly, Bat, Harris Hawks, and Genetic Algorithm, for software fault prediction. We evaluate the algorithms using three commonly used datasets, JM1, CM1, and PC1. Our experimental results show that nature inspired approaches can effectively predict software faults, with some algorithms performing better than others depending on the dataset used. Our findings suggest that these approaches have potential to be used as a practical and efficient means for software fault prediction.},
      keywords = {Nature Inspired Algorithms, PSO, Ant Colony Optimization, Harris Hawks, Genetic Algorithm (GA), Python Programming, Jupyter Notebook, Confusion Matrix},
      month = {June},
  }