Home / Current Issue / Paper 1704840
Current Strategies of the Aviation Industry in Preventing the Exposure to Cosmic Radiation
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Aviation
Abstract
It is feasible that passengers aboard airplane could occasionally be exposed to the sun's ionizing radiation because the sun has the ability to emit ionizing radiation. The specific variety of ionizing radiation that is produced in extraterrestrial environments is referred to as "cosmic ionizing radiation.? When an airplane travels to higher altitudes, everyone on board, including the crew and passengers, is exposed to a greater quantity of cosmic radiation. The findings of this study offered improved methods for reducing the likelihood that passengers and flight crew may be exposed to cosmic radiation. It determined the level of perception held by the passengers as well as the level of satisfaction they held. Additionally, the strong association that exists between the degrees of perception and satisfaction was found to be identified by this research. In conclusion, the research came up with some improved strategies that were formulated based on the findings and implications of the study. A combined total of one hundred participants, including both passengers and crew members, took part in the investigation of the study using a mixed method of research. In addition to that, the data collection utilized the method of convenience sampling. As a consequence of this, there is a strong positive relationship, which is very significant, between the amount of satisfaction and the level of perception of the participants. It is anticipated that there would be a required amount of radiation that a person has to be exposed to as part of an enhanced strategy. For example, in the case of the aircraft company, the level of radiation rises as altitude increases. As a passenger, the possibility of being exposed is very low.
References
[1] Baczynska, K.A.; Brown, S.; Chorley, A.C.; O’Hagan, J.B.; Khazova, M.; Lyachev, A.;Wittlich, M. (2020). In-Flight UV-A Exposure of Commercial Airline Pilots. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform 91, 501–510. [CrossRef].
[2] Bodewein, L.; Schmiedchen, K.; Dechent, D.; \\\\ Stunder, D.; Graefrath, D.; Winter, L.; Kraus, T.; Driessen, S.(2019). Systematic review on the biological effects of electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields in the intermediate frequency range (300 Hz to 1 MHz). Environ. Res. 171, 247–259.[CrossRef] [PubMed].
[3] Cadilhac, P.; Bouton, M.-C.; Cantegril, M.; Cardines, C.; Gisquet, A.; Kaufman, N.; Klerlein (2017). M. In-Flight. Ultraviolet Radiation on Commercial Airplanes. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform 88, 947– 951. [CrossRef]
[4] Chorley, A.C.; Baczynska, K.A.; Benwell, M.J.; Evans, B.J.W.; Higlett, M.P.; Khazova, M.; O’Hagan, J.B. Occupational Ocular UV Exposure in Civilian Aircrew. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 2016, 87, 32–39.[CrossRef] [PubMed].
[5] EURATOM. Council Directive 96/29/EURATOM of 13 May 1996 Laying Down the Basic Safety Standards for Protection of the Health of Workers and the General Public against the Dangers Arising from Ionizing Radiation. Off. J. Eur. Communities 1996, 159, 10–11.
[6] EURATOM. C ouncil Directive 2013/59/EURATOM of 5 December 2013 Laying Down the Basic Safety Standards for Protection of the Health of Workers and the General Public against the Dangers Arising from Exposure to Ionizing Radiation and repealing. Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom.O_. J. Eur. Communities 2014, 57, 1–73. The German Aerospace Center M-42 radiation detector—A new development for applications in mixed radiation fields. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2019, 90, 125115. [CrossRef] [PubMed (Handbook)
[7] Gill, J. (2020). Why pilots and flight attendants have higher risk skin cancer. In: https://utswmed.org. ICRP. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection—ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 1991, 21, 1–3. ICRP. P103: The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 1–332.
[8] Hess, V.F. Über Beobachtungen der durchdringenden Strahlung bei sieben Freiballonfahrten. Phys. Z. 1912, XIII, 1084.
[9] International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. ICNIRP statement— Protection of workers against ultraviolet radiation. Health Phys. 2010, 99, 66–87. [CrossRef] 51. Di_ey, B.L.; Roscoe, A.H. Exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation in flight. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1990, 61,1032– 1035. [PubMed]
[10] ISO. ISO 20785-1:2020 Dosimetry for Exposures to Cosmic Radiation in Civilian Aircraft—Part 1: Conceptual Basis for Measurements; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland.
[11] ISO. ISO 20785-2:2020 Dosimetry for Exposures to Cosmic Radiation in Civilian Aircraft—Part 2: Characterizationof Instrument Response; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
[12] ISO. ISO 20785-3:2015 Dosimetry for Exposures to Cosmic Radiation in Civilian Aircraft—Part 3: Measurements at Aviation Altitudes; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
[13] ISO. ISO 20785-4:2019 Dosimetry for Exposures to Cosmic Radiation in Civilian Aircraft—Part 4: Validation of Codes. International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland.
[14] Major, A, A. M., & Boja, D. (2018). What can cosmic radiation cause in polymers? IOP Conference Series.Materials Science and Engineering, 448(1) https:// 899X/448/1/012057.
[15] Meier, M. M., Copeland, K., Klöble, K.,E.J., Matthiä, D., Plettenberg, M. C., Schennetten, K., . . . Hellweg, C. E. (2020). Radiation in the Atmosphere—A hazard to aviation safety? Atmosphere, 11(12), 1358. https://
[16] Nakagawara, V.B.; Montgomery, R.W.; Marshall, W.J.O. Optical Radiation Transmittance of Aircraft Windscreens and Pilot Vision. In FAA Report. DOT/FAA/AM-07/20; 2007. Available online: https://www.faa.gov/data_ research/research/medhumanfacs/oamtechreport s/2000s/media/200720.pdf.
[17] National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Report No. 160. Recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 2009.
[18] Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (2020). RTCA DO-160G. RTCA T4 — Environmental Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment; Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics: Washington, DC, USA.
[19] Regener, E.; Pfotzer, G. Vertical Intensity of Cosmic Rays by Threefold Coincidences in the Stratosphere. Nature 1935, 136, 718–719. [CrossRef]. Sanlorenzo, M.; Vujic, I.; Posch, C.; Cleaver, J.E.; Quaglino, P.; Ortiz-Urda, S. The risk of melanoma in pilots and cabin crew: UV measurements In flying airplanes. JAMA Dermatol. 2015, 151, 450–452. [CrossRef].
[20] Scenhir Scientific Committee on Emerging Newly Identified Health Risks (2015). Opinion on Potential Health Effects of Exposure toElectromagnetic Fields (EMF); European Commission, DG Health and Food Safety: Luxembourg.
[21] Schennetten, K.; Meier, M.M.; Scheibinger, M. Measurement of UV radiation in commercial aircraft. J. Radiol. Prot. 2018, 39, 85–96. [CrossRef].
[22] Susumu, S., Wickramasinghe, N. K., Tatsuhiko, S., & Daikou, S. (2021). Estimate of economic impact of atmospheric radiation storm associated with solar energetic particle events on aircraft operations. Earth, Planets and Space (Online), 73(1) https://
[23] Tezari, A., Paschalis, P., Stassinakis, A., Mavromichalaki, H., Karaiskos, P., Gerontidou, M., . . . Dierckxsens, M. (2022). Radiation exposure in the lower atmosphere during different periods of solar activity.Atmosphere,13(2), 166. https://
[24] Usoskin, I.G.; Mursula, K.; Kangas, J.; Gvozdevsky, B. On-Line Database of Cosmic Ray Intensities. In Proceedings of the 27th International Cosmic Ray Conference, Hamburg, Germany, 7–15 August 2001; p. 3842.
[25] Zarrouk N, Bennaceur R. Estimates of cosmic radiation exposure on Tunisian passenger aircraft. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;130(4):419-26. Epub 2008 Mar 28. PMID: 18375944.
[26] IAEA in: www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/orpas- mission-to-philippines- highlights-efforts-to- enhance-radiation-protection-of-workers. Retrieved April 10, 2023
[27] Eulinia M. Valdezco, M.Sc.PNRI DOST www.irpa.net/irpa10/cdrom/01232.pdf
[28] C.Scheibler, S.M. Toprani, I.Mordukhovich, M. Schaefer, S. Staffa, Z.D. Nagel, E. McNeely, Cancer risks from cosmic radiation exposure in Flight A review www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC97233 64/
[29] FAA Advisory Circular In-Flight Radiation Exposure www.faa.gov/documentlibrary/media/advisory_ circular/ac_120-61b.pdf
How to cite this paper
@article{1704840,
author = {Henry Jones G. Amparo, Dr. Froilan B. Balucio D. AeM.},
title = {Current Strategies of the Aviation Industry in Preventing the Exposure to Cosmic Radiation},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2023},
volume = {7},
number = {1},
pages = {105-117},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1704840.pdf},
abstract = {It is feasible that passengers aboard airplane could occasionally be exposed to the sun's ionizing radiation because the sun has the ability to emit ionizing radiation. The specific variety of ionizing radiation that is produced in extraterrestrial environments is referred to as "cosmic ionizing radiation.? When an airplane travels to higher altitudes, everyone on board, including the crew and passengers, is exposed to a greater quantity of cosmic radiation. The findings of this study offered improved methods for reducing the likelihood that passengers and flight crew may be exposed to cosmic radiation. It determined the level of perception held by the passengers as well as the level of satisfaction they held. Additionally, the strong association that exists between the degrees of perception and satisfaction was found to be identified by this research. In conclusion, the research came up with some improved strategies that were formulated based on the findings and implications of the study. A combined total of one hundred participants, including both passengers and crew members, took part in the investigation of the study using a mixed method of research. In addition to that, the data collection utilized the method of convenience sampling. As a consequence of this, there is a strong positive relationship, which is very significant, between the amount of satisfaction and the level of perception of the participants. It is anticipated that there would be a required amount of radiation that a person has to be exposed to as part of an enhanced strategy. For example, in the case of the aircraft company, the level of radiation rises as altitude increases. As a passenger, the possibility of being exposed is very low.},
month = {July},
}