Home / Current Issue / Paper 1705013
Comparative Study on Airframe Specialist graduates of Approved Training Organizations
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Aviation Education
Abstract
The purpose of this Study is to come out with a comparison of Sheet Metal Specialist Training (SMST) graduates from the different Approved Training Organizations (ATO) in Manila in terms of the skills they acquired from the SMSTs and their performance level/rating. Therefore vis-?-vis the requirements and qualifications standards set by the various Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) stations in Manila, by gathering information through survey. Two (2) sets of questionnaires were handed out to forty (40) participants comprised of the first batch (2019) of graduates of the Wide-Aero School of Aviation (WASA) and the Flight School International (FSI). WASA and FSI are among the ATOs in Manila that are duly certified by the Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP) and the Philippines Civil Aviation Regulation (PCAR). The participants are the target respondents to this study because of the location of the ATOs that they trained. Among the information required for this Study, are the qualification standards and the performance rating/assessment of the survey-participants/personnel at the entry-level airframe mechanic positions. The survey questionnaires for the ATO-graduates is a self-rating type and was devised using the skills test standards of CAAP found in Advisory Circular (AC) 02-18. The said Skills Test Standards enumerates the subject areas covered by an airframe mechanics, the description of performance levels 1, 2 and 3, and the tasks involved which are the basis by which performance level are assessed. In general, this enabled the researcher to gather performance level rating of the participants from ATOs and their demographic profile. The survey questionnaire for the major MROs was also designed using the AC 02-18 standards, which aimed at gathering the required demographic profile and the performance rating of an entry-level airframe mechanic in each of the subject areas as rated by the authorized personnel, the Human Resource officials or the maintenance manager, whoever is applicable. The data gathered from ATOs were analyzed through Mann-Whitney, and the results/findings thereof are compared with the data gathered and analyzed from the MROs. The comparative results from there were then used as a basis for the way forward-recommendations that ATOs may undertake to improve/enhance the qualification standards and the quality of training for the entry- level airframe mechanic in MROs in Manila.
Keywords
Aircraft Maintenance, Airframe Specialist, Aviation Education
References
[1] Crane, D. (1989). Aviation Mechanic Handbook. Jeppesen.
[2] Crane, D. (1994). Aviaiton Maintenance Tehnician- Airframe, volume 2 systems.
[3] Crane, D. (2018). Aviation Maintenance Technician- General.
[4] Everitt, B. (2006). The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics 3rd Edition.
[5] FAA. (2008). Aviation Technician Handbook. Jeppesen.
[6] Federal Aviation Authority. (2016). Airframe Technician Textbook. Jeppesen.
[7] Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2000). First Steps In Research and Statistics: A Practical Approach for Psychology Students. Routledge.
[8] Kearns, Mavin, & Hodge. (2016). Competency-Based Education: Exploring Alternate Pathways.
[9] Kvam, P. H., & Vidakovic, B. (2007). Non-Parametric Statistics with application to Science and Engineering. Canada: Wiley-Interscience.
[10] Wasserman, L. (2006). All of Non-Parametric Statistics. Springer. Weiss, N. A. (2012). Introductory Statistics 9th Edition. Pearson.
[11] Castro, S. (2017). Work Experience the Leading Factor for Employment.
[12] Clark, P., Newcomer, J., & Jones, A. M. (2015, September). Overcoming Gender Barriers in Aircraft Maintenance: Women's Perception in the United States.
[13] Felipe, M. (n.d.). The Benefits of Hiring Twenty-Somethings. Flight School International. (2019). Company Profile.
[14] Taylor. (2008). "Employment Specialist", Competencies as Predictors of Employment Outcomes.
[15] Arbozo, C. (2011). Level of competency of physics instructor in the Philippine State College of Aeronautics.
[16] Arnold, D., Gramopadhye, A., Bingham, J., Master, R., & Quadros, N. (2000). Preparing the aircraft maintenance technician for tomorrow: assessment of the new AMT Curriculum.
[17] Breeding, J. (2018). The Need for Increased Critical Technical Skills: Integrating Federal Aviation Administration Airframe and Powerplant Certification in Aircraft Maintenance Force Development.
[18] Dallal, D. (2012). Dealing with deliberately distortions methods to reduce bias in self-report measures of sensitive constructs.
[19] Gaco, M. B. (2019). Assessing the Competency of PHILSCA-FAB 4th year BSAET Students in the Area of Navigational Aid Maintenance.
[20] Gagtan, E. (2019). Effectiveness of the technical competency certification program for air navigation service personnel.
[21] Goldby, R., & Soulis, A. (2002). Optimization of aviation maintenance personnel training and certification.
[22] Josol. (2019). An Evaluation on the Relevance of Continuing Professional Development to the Career Growth of Aeronautical Engineers.
[23] Kline, R. B. (2004). Beyond Significance Testing. Washinton, DC: American Psychological Association.
[24] Sajonia, J. (2010). Competency of aircrew assigned at the 207th tactical helicopter squadron, Philippine Air Force.
[25] Summey, J., Schultz, M., & Schultz, J. (2004). Are four years universities better than two-year colleges at preparing students to pass the FAA aircraft mechanic certification examinations?
[26] Ting-Hsien, L. (2004). Integrated aviation maintenance technician training for multi-level education institutions.
[27] Ward, M., Nick Mcdonald, R. M., & Nugent, T. (2009). A Performance Improvement Case Study in Aircraft Maintenance and its Implications for Hazard Identification.
[28] Enees, J. (2007). New graduate joins passenger airline: A study of aircraft mechanic certification.
[29] Roseman, R., Tennekon, V., & Hill, L. (2011). Measuring bias in self- reported data.
[30] Rupasinghe, T., Kurz, M., Gramopadhye, A., & Washburn, C. (2010). Improving Aircraft Maintenance Technology Education: Bloom's Taxonomy Perspective.
[31] Rutao, M. (2019). The Level of Competency of Structure Technicians in Assembling Galley Panel of Boeing 787 in JAMCO Philippines Inc.
[32] International Civil Aviation Organization. (n.d.). The Convention on International Air Regulation. Annex 1: Personnel Licensing.
[33] Larson, D. (2011). Global Survey of the experience and education of aviation maintenance instructors.
[34] Levery. (2015). Outsourcing Maintenance- A Question of Strategy.Martin, M. L. (2009). Level of Competency of Ground Instructors of Aircraft
[35] Maintenance Technology of the Philippine State College of Aeronautics.
[36] Mcgrath, R., & Waguespack, B. (1999). The airline's maintenance mechanic educational infrastructure; Demand and Evolving Industry Structure.
[37] White, C., & Kroes, M. (2002). Standards for the certification of aviation maintenance technicians using a structured experience program.
[38] Wide-Aero School of Aviation / Corporation. (2019). Company Profile.
[39] Williams, M., & Rhoades, D. (2006). Meeting the needs of the aviation industry through aviation maintenance schools.
[40] Zogheib, H. (1994). An analysis of aviation maintenance technician training and recommended improvements.
[41] Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines. (2011). Civil Air Regulation Part 6: Approved Maintenance Organization.
[42] Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines. (2011). Civil Air Regulations Part 2: Personnel Licensing. Advisory Circular 02-18; AMT Skill Test Standards.
[43] Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines. (2011). Civil Air Regulations Part 3: Approved Training Organization.
[44] Federal Aviation Authority. (n.d.). Federal Air Regulation Part 147: Aviation Maintenance Technician School.
[45] Federal Aviation Authority. (n.d.). Federal Air Regulations Part 65: Certification: Airmen other than flight crewmembers.
How to cite this paper
@article{1705013,
author = {James Espiritu Deato},
title = {Comparative Study on Airframe Specialist graduates of Approved Training Organizations},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2023},
volume = {7},
number = {3},
pages = {9-15},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1705013.pdf},
abstract = {The purpose of this Study is to come out with a comparison of Sheet Metal Specialist Training (SMST) graduates from the different Approved Training Organizations (ATO) in Manila in terms of the skills they acquired from the SMSTs and their performance level/rating. Therefore vis-?-vis the requirements and qualifications standards set by the various Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO) stations in Manila, by gathering information through survey. Two (2) sets of questionnaires were handed out to forty (40) participants comprised of the first batch (2019) of graduates of the Wide-Aero School of Aviation (WASA) and the Flight School International (FSI). WASA and FSI are among the ATOs in Manila that are duly certified by the Civil Aviation Authority of the Philippines (CAAP) and the Philippines Civil Aviation Regulation (PCAR). The participants are the target respondents to this study because of the location of the ATOs that they trained. Among the information required for this Study, are the qualification standards and the performance rating/assessment of the survey-participants/personnel at the entry-level airframe mechanic positions. The survey questionnaires for the ATO-graduates is a self-rating type and was devised using the skills test standards of CAAP found in Advisory Circular (AC) 02-18. The said Skills Test Standards enumerates the subject areas covered by an airframe mechanics, the description of performance levels 1, 2 and 3, and the tasks involved which are the basis by which performance level are assessed. In general, this enabled the researcher to gather performance level rating of the participants from ATOs and their demographic profile. The survey questionnaire for the major MROs was also designed using the AC 02-18 standards, which aimed at gathering the required demographic profile and the performance rating of an entry-level airframe mechanic in each of the subject areas as rated by the authorized personnel, the Human Resource officials or the maintenance manager, whoever is applicable. The data gathered from ATOs were analyzed through Mann-Whitney, and the results/findings thereof are compared with the data gathered and analyzed from the MROs. The comparative results from there were then used as a basis for the way forward-recommendations that ATOs may undertake to improve/enhance the qualification standards and the quality of training for the entry- level airframe mechanic in MROs in Manila.},
keywords = {Aircraft Maintenance, Airframe Specialist, Aviation Education},
month = {September},
}