Impact Evaluation of Traditional and Virtual Learning System of Students' Performance: A Case Study of Edo State Institute of Technology and Management, Usen (Edo State Polytechnic)

References

[1] J. Smith (2017). Traditional Classroom Settings: An Overview of Educational Systems. Journal of Education Research, 42(3), 112-128.

[2] R. Jones & S. Brown (2020). Challenging Tradition: The Rise of Virtual Learning Environments. International Journal of Educational Technology, 15(2), 78-94.

[3] R. Clark & R. Mayer (2016). Technology Advancements and the Shift to Virtual Learning. Educational Technology Review, 28(4), 210- 225.

[4] B. Means et al. (2013). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Virtual Learning Environments: A Comprehensive Study. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 20(1), 45-63.

[5] D.R. Garrison & H. Kanuka (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105.

[6] D.R Garrison & N.D Vaughan (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons.

[7] C.R Graham (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs, 3-21.

[8] H. Zheng, M. Warschauer, C.H. Lin & C. Chang, (2016). Factors Shaping the Educational Experience: A Multidimensional Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 35(4), 289- 305.

[9] G. Siemens (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.

[10] J. Hattie (2009). Feedback and Teacher-Student Relationships: Keys to Success in Traditional Classrooms. Educational Psychology Review, 25(2), 175-187.

[11] I. E. Allen & J. Seaman (2017). Digital Learning Compass: Distance Education Enrolment, Report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group.

[12] P. Shea & T. Bidjerano (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self- regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1721-1731.

[13] A.G. Picciano & J. Seaman (2009). K–12 online learning: A 2008 follow-up of the survey of US school district administrators. Babson Survey Research Group.

[14] G. Salmon (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. Routledge.

[15] K. Swan (2003). Learning effectiveness online: What the research tells us. Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities, 13, 45- 76.

[16] A. P. Rovai (2002). Building a Sense of Community at a Distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1).

[17] N. D. Vaughan (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(1), 81-94.

[18] L.S. Vygotsky (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.

[19] C.K. Blackwell., A.R. Lauricella & E. Wartella, (2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education, 77, 82-90.

[20] C. Dede (2010). Comparing frameworks for 21st century skills. 21st Century Skills: Rethinking How Students Learn, 51(2), 51-76.

@article{1705280,
      author = {Aghahowa, A. E, Idiata, D. J, Asikhia, O. K, Omoregbe, J. O, Edoimioya, P. O; Osghae, P. V},
      title = {Impact Evaluation of Traditional and Virtual Learning System of Students' Performance: A Case Study of Edo State Institute of Technology and Management, Usen (Edo State Polytechnic)},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2023},
      volume = {7},
      number = {6},
      pages = {121-129},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1705280.pdf},
      abstract = {The present study aims to examine the effects of both traditional and virtual learning environments on students' educational experiences and academic achievements. The demographic makeup of the population, which is characterized by a wide range of backgrounds, particularly consisting of individuals in the young adult age group, provides valuable insights into the preferences and difficulties faced by a generation that has grown up with digital technology. The participants in this study expressed diverse experiences within traditional classroom settings, exhibiting a discernible inclination towards neutrality. This observation implies the presence of a balanced perspective among the participants. Significantly, there was an observable increase in familiarity with virtual learning after the completion of the training, suggesting that exposure to and instruction in this mode of education had a positive impact. The phenomenon of engagement and motivation in virtual environments demonstrates a clear division, emphasizing the necessity of implementing personalized strategies to accommodate a wide range of individual preferences. Perceptions regarding academic achievement were generally favorable towards virtual learning, as a majority of participants reported performance levels that were either above average or average. The role of teacher-student interactions was significant, with higher levels of satisfaction observed in virtual environments, highlighting the potential advantages of digital communication tools. The aforementioned findings underscore the importance of incorporating flexibility into educational strategies, recognizing the diverse requirements of learners. The study proposes that a hybrid model, which combines the advantages of conventional and virtual approaches, may provide a holistic and equitable educational solution. In conclusion, this research provides significant contributions to the ongoing academic discussion surrounding the dynamic nature of education, highlighting the importance of creating adaptive and customized learning environments.},
      keywords = {Traditional Learning, Virtual Learning, Education Technology, Academic Performance, Impact Evaluation},
      month = {December},
  }